Jim Jordan considers alternative to dropping out of House speaker race.
Rep. Jim Jordan Weighs Exit Strategy in House Speaker Race
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) is considering his next move in the House speaker race after two unsuccessful attempts and the likelihood of a third round of voting resulting in defeat. To discuss his options, the Ohio Republican met with a select group that included Speaker Pro Tempore Patrick McHenry (R-NC), former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), and a few aides.
Exploring a Resolution to Broaden McHenry’s Powers
During the meeting, they explored the possibility of Jordan supporting a resolution that has gained popularity among his critics. This resolution would grant McHenry expanded powers until January, in exchange for McHenry’s continued support of Jordan as speaker-designate.
The plan involves utilizing Jordan’s position as speaker-designate to integrate him into the leadership fold over the next few months. This would be done through various events, fundraisers, and other activities to assess his capabilities for the role.
If Jordan remains speaker-designate until January, this plan would pave the way for a third speaker vote. It would also allow Jordan to avoid conceding defeat and withdrawing as the Republicans’ internal nominee, which would leave the House GOP leaderless for an extended period.
Challenges and Potential Democratic Support
Winning over Jordan’s staunchest supporters, particularly those in the House Freedom Caucus, who oppose expanding McHenry’s powers, would be a significant challenge. Additionally, if more than four Republicans oppose the McHenry plan, Democratic Party support would be required due to the GOP’s slim majority.
While Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME) has shown openness to the idea, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) has not confirmed whether he and his caucus would support such a measure.
Internal Opposition and Urgency to Move Legislation
Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), a vocal member of the Freedom Caucus, expressed opposition to the McHenry plan on social media, hinting at the potential internal resistance it may face.
However, more of Jordan’s opponents are warming up to the idea of empowering McHenry. They argue that the looming government shutdown and the ongoing conflict in Israel necessitate urgent legislative action.
Jordan’s Options and the McHenry Option
As of Thursday morning, Jordan’s options are to either stay in the race and risk a more devastating loss than before or withdraw as the internal nominee. While Jordan’s office maintains his intention to proceed with another round of voting, the possibility of pursuing the McHenry option remains on the table.
Click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.
What factors will Rep. Jim Jordan consider when deciding whether or not to support the resolution to broaden McHenry’s powers
Litical capital and influence to push for a resolution that would broaden McHenry’s powers as Speaker Pro Tempore until January. This would allow McHenry to assume more of the responsibilities and duties typically held by the Speaker of the House. In return for this expanded role, McHenry would pledge his ongoing support for Jordan as the speaker-designate.
Evaluating the Pros and Cons
There are several pros and cons to consider with this proposed resolution. On one hand, by granting McHenry more authority, it may assist in unifying the Republican Party and bridging the divide between various factions within the House. McHenry, known for his pragmatic approach and ability to work with colleagues on both sides of the aisle, could bring a level of stability and consensus-building to the position.
Furthermore, by allowing McHenry to serve as a bridge between more moderate and conservative members of the Republican Party, it may pave the way for future cooperation and collaboration within the party. This could be crucial in addressing pressing issues like infrastructure, tax reform, and immigration.
On the other hand, there are concerns that this resolution could be seen as a power grab by Jordan. Critics may argue that this move is an attempt to retain control and influence within the party, even if it means compromising on the official title of House Speaker. Additionally, some may question McHenry’s ability to handle the heightened responsibilities that come with the expanded powers, and whether he is the right person for this role.
Factors Influencing Jordan’s Decision
Several factors may influence Jordan’s decision regarding his potential support for this resolution. Firstly, he will likely consider the level of support he has within his own party. If Jordan believes that he does not have enough backing to secure the speakership himself, he may see this resolution as a feasible compromise.
Secondly, he will likely weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks of having McHenry assume a more prominent role. Jordan may view the potential for party unity and cooperation as valuable enough to support this resolution, despite any criticisms or reservations.
Finally, Jordan will consider the long-term implications of this decision. How will it affect his standing within the party? Will this compromise enhance or hinder his chances of future leadership positions? These are important considerations that will undoubtedly play a role in Jordan’s decision-making process.
The Road Ahead
As Rep. Jim Jordan weighs his exit strategy in the House Speaker race, it is clear that he is exploring all possible options. The proposed resolution to broaden Patrick McHenry’s powers is one option that has gained traction, but its implementation and success are far from certain. Jordan’s decision will ultimately have significant consequences for his own political future, the Republican Party, and the dynamics within the House of Representatives. Only time will tell what path he chooses to pursue.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
