Washington Examiner

JD Vance urges Ohioans to reject abortion ballot measure, emphasizing it’s not about freedom.

Ohio Senator Urges Voters to Reject Ballot Measure⁢ Allowing Unrestricted Abortion Access

Senator J.D.​ Vance (R-OH) passionately called on Ohioans⁤ to vote “no” on a ballot measure that⁣ seeks⁤ to ⁢bypass state law⁢ and grant unrestricted access to abortion. The ⁣measure, known as Issue ‍1, will appear⁤ on the November ballot⁤ and aims to eliminate abortion restrictions in the state. Critics⁢ argue ⁢that ⁢the⁤ wording of the measure⁤ is broad enough to permit minors to ⁣obtain‌ abortions and sex-change operations without parental consent.

“They will ⁣say ⁤this is all about freedom: ​’It’s all about freedom. We just want⁣ people to have the freedom,'” Vance declared during his speech at‌ the Ohio March for Life event in Columbus. ⁣He shared his personal encounters with lower-income women who felt‌ pressured into terminating their pregnancies. ‌”It was never about freedom. They​ were pressured into it, sometimes by a ⁣boyfriend or, ⁣God forbid, a parent. They felt trapped,⁤ with no‍ other‍ options. They worried​ about their ability⁣ to care for⁤ a child. Well, we are here to‍ tell​ them that there is a choice: ​We⁢ must‍ choose life and fight ⁤for​ it.”

The​ Ohio ballot measure ⁣follows⁤ an unsuccessful attempt by​ opponents to raise the majority ‌threshold⁤ required for passing constitutional amendments in the state. It also comes after pro-abortion rights victories in several other states’ ballot measures last ⁤year.

Vance emphasized that ⁤this ⁤issue⁤ is deeply ingrained ⁣in society, spanning at least ‍five⁤ decades. “What does​ it say about a society, what does it say about our country when we ‍prioritize everything over the well-being of our own‌ children?” ​he questioned. “If someone is telling you⁣ that getting‌ rid of your own baby is⁢ in your best interest, they do not have your⁣ best interests at heart. They are not on your side.”

He continued, “For 50 ⁣years, ​unborn babies have been discarded in‍ this country. We have conveyed to our society⁤ that everything—education, jobs, and everything else—is more important ‍than the most vulnerable members of our society.⁢ It was a mistake, and we have ⁤been making it⁢ for 50 years.”

The ballot⁤ measure is supported by Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties‍ Union (ACLU), which Vance highlighted in his speech. He questioned the motives behind these radical ⁣abortion amendments, asking, “Why is it that every time ​we see one of these amendments,⁢ it is always funded by the⁤ most ⁢powerful out-of-state interests?”

The ACLU of ⁤Ohio encourages supporters to vote “yes” on the measure, directing ⁤them to Ohioans ⁣United for Reproductive‌ Rights. The organization states, ⁤”Decisions⁤ regarding pregnancy, including abortion, birth control, and miscarriage care, are personal and private and should be left to women and their families. However, here in Ohio, the government is making those decisions for us. They have already banned abortion, even in cases of ‌rape and incest.”

Vance argued that the backers of the measure aim to surpass the standards set by Roe‌ v. ⁣Wade‍ and transform Ohio into the “most radical pro-abortion state in the entire​ country.” He asserted, “This⁢ is not about freedom; it is about control.​ It⁤ is about taking control away from parents and ⁤placing​ it in the hands of bureaucrats and​ judges. It is about depriving our people of the choice to choose life ⁢and handing it over⁢ to out-of-state interests. Whenever we allow ​powerful ‌individuals to prey on women, it is the newborn babies who suffer next.”

Early voting in Ohio begins on October 11 and will continue until Election Day on‍ November 7.

The Washington Examiner reached out ⁣to the‍ ACLU of Ohio for comment.

What ⁣are the arguments made by ‌religious organizations against‌ the ballot measure, and how do they tie into the belief in the sanctity of life

⁤Child is empowerment, that person has a deeply twisted understanding of empowerment.”⁤

Those⁤ advocating for the ballot measure⁣ argue that it is necessary to safeguard women’s⁢ reproductive rights​ and ensure that they⁣ have control over​ their own bodies. They⁤ claim that‍ removing restrictions ⁤on abortion⁤ access is a step toward⁢ empowering women to make choices about their own healthcare.

However, Senator Vance ‍⁣asserted that this measure goes beyond giving⁤ women options and actually opens the door to potential harm, especially for vulnerable individuals. “Issue 1 may sound like⁢ a noble cause for choice​ and access, but it is reckless‌ and dangerous,” he warned. “We should always strive to protect the ⁤most vulnerable⁢ among us, especially the⁣ unborn.”

The battle over this ballot measure has sparked passionate debates on both sides. Proponents argue that it is about reproductive rights and empowering women to make decisions about their own bodies. Opponents, like Senator Vance, argue that it is about⁢ protecting the lives of the unborn and preserving the sanctity of life.

Many religious organizations have joined the ‍fight against the‍ measure, citing their belief in the sanctity of life and‌ their commitment ⁤to preserving​ the rights ‌of the unborn. They argue​ that life begins at conception and should be ‍protected at all costs.

The role of government has also been a topic of discussion‌ in this debate. Supporters of the measure believe that government should not interfere in personal decisions regarding reproductive rights, while ‍opponents assert that it‌ is ​the government’s ​duty to protect the rights and lives of its ⁢citizens, including the unborn.

Ultimately, the decision will be ‍in the hands of Ohio voters. They will have the ⁤opportunity to cast their votes and determine the future of abortion access in their state. Senator ‍Vance encouraged Ohioans to carefully consider the implications of⁤ the ballot measure and​ vote ‍”no” on Issue 1.

As the November election approaches, the battle‌ over abortion access in ⁤Ohio continues to ⁣intensify. It is⁣ a deeply divisive issue that ⁤elicits strong emotions on both sides. Regardless of the outcome, it ​is ⁤clear that this debate will shape the future of reproductive‍ rights in the state‍ and have far-reaching implications for the lives of women and the unborn.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker