The daily wire

NM Gov Defiantly Defends Suspending Gun Rights: Police Can’t Dictate Constitutionality.

Governor Mocks‌ Sheriff’s Stance on ‍Gun​ Rights

In‌ a heated exchange,⁤ New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham responded to Sheriff John Allen’s refusal to enforce a segment of her order suspending the right to carry open and concealed guns publicly. The sheriff, echoing the⁢ state’s attorney‌ general, argued that the move was unconstitutional. However, the governor dismissed his​ concerns, stating, “It’s not for police to tell me what’s ⁤constitutional or ⁣not.”

Sheriff Stands Firm on Constitutional Grounds

Sheriff Allen, from ⁤Bernalillo ‍County, made his position clear: “The ⁤Bernalillo County Sheriff’s ​Office will not enforce this segment of the ⁣order. While‌ I⁤ understand the urgency, the ⁢temporary⁢ ban ‍challenges the‌ foundations of our Constitution.⁢ But most importantly, it‍ is ⁢unconstitutional.”

A Clash ⁣of Views

During an interview with CNN’s ⁣Poppy Harlow, Governor Grisham ⁤expressed her frustration with law enforcement’s opposition ​to her order. She snapped, “It’s not for police to tell me what’s constitutional ‌or not. They haven’t supported one, not one gun violence effort in ​the State of‍ New ⁣Mexico, including domestic violence protections, universal background checks.”

Harlow, pointing out that Grisham is an attorney, questioned ⁤the​ governor’s confidence in the constitutionality of her order. Grisham responded defiantly, ​”Well, we’re going to see. I mean, look, I wouldn’t do it if I didn’t‍ think I had the right. I have the right.”

Constitutional Grounds Challenged

Harlow pressed further,​ citing Article‍ 2, Section 6 of the New Mexico constitution, ‍which protects the right to bear arms. She argued ‍that the governor’s order may violate both the U.S. Constitution and ⁣the state’s constitution. Grisham dismissed ⁢the concern, stating, “I don’t believe that we ⁤are. And if that narrow reading of the ‍constitution, ⁣which has⁤ been tested⁣ in the state, we​ wouldn’t have universal background checks, we wouldn’t have a waiting​ period, we wouldn’t have a red flag law,⁣ we wouldn’t ​have prohibitions⁤ for straw⁢ purchases.‌ None of those would ​have been deemed constitutional. And ‍today all of them ‌are.”

Harlow reminded Grisham that ⁣these laws were established before the Supreme Court ruling. ‌However,⁣ the governor‌ argued that they haven’t ​been tested again.

A ⁢Battle for Rights

As the debate continued, Harlow questioned ​the⁢ governor’s ⁢intentions. Grisham responded confidently, “Listen, I can make any number of‍ statements and‌ already ‌have.”



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker