Jon Huntsman stops funding UPenn due to their response to Hamas attacks in Israel.
Former U.S. Ambassador to China and Russia Cuts Ties with UPenn Over Response to Israel Attacks
In a bold move, Jon Huntsman, the former U.S. Ambassador to China and Russia, has informed the University of Pennsylvania that his foundation will no longer provide donations to the school. Huntsman, a UPenn graduate himself, expressed his disappointment in an email to UPenn President Liz Magill, stating that the institution’s response to the recent terrorist attacks against Israel was unacceptable. The email, reported by the Daily Pennsylvanian, highlighted Huntsman’s concerns about the university’s embrace of “moral relativism” and its current state of being ”almost unrecognizable.”
Israel Under Attack: Hamas Terrorists Hold Nearly 200 People Hostage in Gaza
The decision by the Huntsman Foundation comes in the wake of a series of attacks launched by Hamas terrorists on Israel on October 7th. These attacks, along with Israel’s subsequent military response in the Gaza Strip, have tragically resulted in the loss of over 4,000 lives. Shockingly, student groups at various prominent universities have voiced support for Hamas and placed blame on Israel for the attacks. Huntsman expressed his disappointment in UPenn’s silence regarding these events, leading him and his family to withdraw their support for the institution.
“To an outsider, it is evident that Penn has lost its way, becoming unrecognizable,” Huntsman stated in his email to Magill. “The university’s embrace of moral relativism has led it down a dangerous path, where remaining impartial is no longer an option. By failing to condemn the reprehensible and historic evil committed by Hamas against the people of Israel, the university has reached a new low. Silence in the face of such acts is nothing short of antisemitism, and antisemitism is rooted in hate, which goes against the very principles higher education was built upon.”
Magill and Provost John Jackson eventually released statements acknowledging the devastating assault on Israel by Hamas and denouncing acts of antisemitism. However, it was not enough to sway Huntsman’s decision.
“I, along with the University of Pennsylvania, stand firmly against antisemitism,” Magill asserted. “As an academic institution and a campus community, we have a moral responsibility to combat hate and educate our community to recognize and reject it. I am committed to working with Jewish leaders, faculty, students, and staff to foster a safe and inclusive environment.”
A spokesperson for UPenn referred to Magill’s recent statement and a statement from Penn Board of Trustees Chairman Scott Bok, which outlined plans to enhance education and training to combat antisemitism on campus.
What does Huntsman’s statement about UPenn being “almost unrecognizable” imply about the direction the university has taken and its alignment with intellectual rigor and critical thinking
Jon Huntsman to cut ties with the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) over their response to the recent attacks against Israel has sent shockwaves through the academic community. Huntsman, a highly respected former U.S. Ambassador to China and Russia, has expressed his disappointment in an email to UPenn President Liz Magill. This move not only highlights the importance of supporting countries under attack by terrorism but also raises questions about the moral compass of our educational institutions.
In the email obtained by the Daily Pennsylvanian and widely reported in various media outlets, Huntsman voiced his concerns about UPenn’s response to the terrorist attacks against Israel. He criticized the university’s embrace of what he referred to as “moral relativism,” indicating that the institution’s stance on the Israel attacks was not in line with his own values.
Israel has been under attack from Hamas militants who have held nearly 200 people hostage in Gaza. The violence escalated after Hamas launched rocket attacks at Israeli cities, leading to a significant loss of life and destruction. The international community has widely condemned these attacks as acts of terrorism against innocent civilians. It is in this context that Huntsman finds UPenn’s response unacceptable.
As a former U.S. Ambassador to two major global powers, Huntsman’s decision to cut ties with his alma mater sends a powerful message. It raises questions about the moral compass and values universities uphold in times of global crisis. UPenn, being an institution of higher learning, plays a crucial role in shaping the minds and values of future leaders. Huntsman’s move is a clear indication that he believes UPenn has fallen short in this regard and no longer aligns with his principles.
Furthermore, Huntsman’s statement that the university is “almost unrecognizable” reveals his disappointment in the direction UPenn has taken. For an alumnus of the institution who has reached such heights in his career, this criticism carries significant weight. It implies that the university has strayed from its original purpose and values, moving away from a mindset that promotes intellectual rigor and critical thinking.
The decision by Huntsman to sever ties with UPenn should not be taken lightly. It serves as a reminder that institutions of higher education have a responsibility to uphold moral principles and take a stance against acts of terrorism. Universities should be at the forefront of promoting values such as peace, democracy, and the protection of innocent lives.
The response from UPenn to Huntsman’s decision will be crucial. It presents an opportunity for the institution to reflect on its actions and reaffirm its commitment to promoting values that align with the principles of the international community. It is crucial for universities to provide an environment that fosters meaningful dialogue and allows for the expression of diverse opinions while upholding fundamental principles of human rights.
In conclusion, Jon Huntsman’s decision to cut ties with UPenn over their response to the Israel attacks has sparked a necessary conversation about the moral compass of educational institutions. It highlights the need for universities to take a clear stance against acts of terrorism and to promote values that align with the principles of peace, democracy, and the protection of innocent lives. It is a reminder that institutions of higher education play a crucial role in shaping the minds and values of future leaders, and it is their responsibility to uphold moral principles in times of global crises.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
