Conservative News Daily

Israel’s 5 missiles could devastate 15 Iranian cities – catastrophic consequences predicted.

Recent Comments Spark Concerns of Nuclear Conflict

In recent ​days, alarming statements made​ by public⁢ officials in Israel and the United States have forced us to confront ‌a terrifying possibility. Israeli ‍lawmaker Revital “Tally” Gotliv ‌shocked‌ the world ⁤by advocating for the use of a “Jericho‍ Missile” ⁤and a “Doomsday weapon” against Palestinians in Gaza. Meanwhile,⁤ Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham warned that an⁤ escalation of the Israel-Hamas conflict could ⁤lead to direct U.S. intervention against ⁤Iran.

In this unsettling era of nuclear weapon discussions and the​ looming threat of World⁤ War III,‌ it​ is​ crucial that we connect the dots and⁣ face the horrifying realities of a potential‍ conflict involving “doomsday” weapons.

The Devastating ⁤Power of ⁤the Jericho⁣ Missile

The “Jericho Missile” mentioned by Gotliv⁣ refers to a class⁢ of Israeli ballistic missiles⁤ dating back to the 1960s. The most ‌advanced version, ⁣Jericho III, is capable of ​carrying ⁤a‌ single nuclear warhead with ​a destructive capacity ranging from ⁣150 to 400 kilotons (kt).

While the exact details of Israel’s nuclear program‍ remain shrouded ⁣in secrecy, experts ⁤estimate that the country possesses between 200 and 300‌ warheads. Furthermore, the​ Jericho III missile⁤ can carry⁤ multiple low-yield MIRV warheads.

Considering these factors, let’s imagine the‍ consequences if Israel were⁢ to‍ unleash just a few “doomsday” ‍weapons against Iran.

The Terrifying Fallout

Assuming each Jericho missile carries three low-yield MIRV warheads, and each warhead has​ an average explosive capacity of 90 kt, we can calculate the potential devastation.

Using‌ the NUKEMAP tool,⁢ we can estimate the​ casualties resulting ‌from the detonation‌ of these warheads over the 15 most populous Iranian cities. The ​results are nothing ‌short of horrifying.

  • Tehran, with a population of nearly ⁣nine million,‌ would suffer an estimated⁤ 644,380 deaths ‌and 1,909,970 injuries.
  • Mashhad, Iran’s ‍second-most populous ‍city,⁣ would experience nearly as many fatalities, with‍ an estimated 568,940 deaths and 919,400 ‌injuries.

In total, these five Israeli missiles ​could kill approximately 4,950,680 Iranians and injure‍ another 8,044,440.

It is important to note that these estimates are based ‌on airburst‌ detonations rather than surface detonations. Additionally, the 90 kt warheads‌ used in this scenario are considered “low yield” compared​ to other nuclear arsenals worldwide.

For perspective, the largest ⁢known nuclear weapon, the Soviet ⁣Union’s 100 megaton “Tsar Bomba,” would cause an estimated 11,050,920 deaths if used⁤ against Tehran.

Each 90 kt Jericho​ III warhead carries six times the ​destructive⁣ power of the Hiroshima bomb.

These figures leave us staggered and deeply disturbed.

A Stark Warning

It is crucial for Iran to carefully ‍consider the‍ consequences of​ provoking a conflict ‌with Israel. The‍ potential loss of life and devastation would be catastrophic. With a total‍ population of ‍less than 90 million, Iran could suffer⁢ immense losses if a conflict were to escalate.


An Urgent Note ⁣from⁢ Our Staff:

The Western Journal has been labeled “dangerous” simply because we have a biblical worldview and speak the truth about what is ⁣happening in America.

We refuse to ⁣let Big Tech‌ and woke advertisers dictate the content ‌we share ⁤with⁤ our community. We stand for truth. We ⁤stand for freedom. We stand with our readers.

We’re asking you to‌ help us in this⁣ fight. We can’t do this without you.

Your donation directly ⁢helps fund our editorial team of writers and editors. Your ‍support means we can continue​ to expose false narratives and defend traditional ‌American ⁤values.

Please stand with us by ⁤donating today.

Thank you for your support!

The post Israel Could Nuke 15 Iranian‍ Cities with Just 5 Missiles⁢ – ⁤Death Projections Are Astronomical appeared first on The Western Journal.

What ⁤are the potential consequences of a “small-scale” nuclear conflict?

Ericho missile, while devastating, ⁢pale‌ in comparison to‌ the catastrophic potential⁤ of weapons like the Tsar Bomba. However, it is ⁣important to ⁣recognize that⁢ even a “small-scale” nuclear conflict could have far-reaching‌ consequences,​ including widespread casualties, ⁢environmental degradation, and‍ long-term health effects.

A Desperate Cry for Diplomacy

It is clear that the recent statements made⁢ by public ‌officials⁢ have ignited​ concerns and sparked a much-needed conversation about the dangers of nuclear conflict. Now, more than ever, the international community ‌must prioritize diplomacy and work towards⁤ peaceful resolutions to​ ongoing ‍conflicts.

Rather than resorting to the use of “doomsday” weapons,⁣ it is crucial that ⁣nations ​engage ‌in ⁢dialogue, seek common ground, and de-escalate tensions. The⁤ consequences⁤ of nuclear conflict ⁣are far too severe to be taken lightly and ⁤demand immediate ⁤attention.

The threat of nuclear war should serve as a wake-up call for ⁤us all.‌ We must⁢ demand accountability from our leaders, advocate ⁤for arms‌ control measures, and support international organizations working towards nuclear disarmament.

It is not too late to change course⁤ and prevent the ⁤unimaginable horrors of nuclear conflict. Let us come‌ together as global citizens and prioritize⁢ peace over violence, ⁣dialogue over aggression, ‌and ⁤diplomacy ‌over destruction.

The future of ‍our⁤ world⁣ depends on ⁤it.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker