Washington Examiner

Iraq’s PM balances anti-US sentiment with Iran’s financial interests

Iraq’s ‌Prime Minister Signals Withdrawal of US-led Coalition Forces

Iraq’s government is taking steps to ‌require the withdrawal of the United States-led military coalition responsible for ​combating ​the Islamic State, according to Prime‍ Minister Mohammed ⁤Shia’ al-Sudani. Speaking to a pro-Iran audience, al-Sudani assured them that the government is actively working on arrangements to permanently end the presence of international coalition forces in‍ Iraq. The goal is to restore complete national sovereignty over Iraqi​ land and skies.

‌Militia Attacks ⁤and Political Pressure

Al-Sudani’s announcement comes ​in‍ the wake of a series of⁣ militia attacks on US forces, culminating in a retaliatory strike in ‌Baghdad that resulted in the death of a militia leader and one of his associates. This⁤ strike has intensified internal political pressure to⁢ demand the withdrawal of US ⁢forces, despite the Biden ‌administration’s assertion ⁤that the slain militia leader was involved ⁢in planning and carrying ‍out attacks against American personnel ‌in Iraq.

According⁣ to Air Force Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder, the Pentagon press secretary, ⁤the US has conducted strikes in ⁣Iraq and Syria against Iranian-sponsored groups, including HAN and Kataib Hezbollah. ⁤These forces pose⁣ a threat to US ‍personnel, and the⁤ US‌ maintains the right to self-defense and will take necessary actions to protect its forces.

⁣Soleimani’s Influence and Political Dynamics

The recent⁣ airstrike in Baghdad occurred four years after a similar attack⁣ ordered by former President Donald Trump that⁢ killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani, a ‌prominent leader of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Soleimani’s​ influence within the Iraqi security system⁢ was evident‌ by the death of Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces deputy commander​ Abu⁢ Mahdi al-Muhandis,​ who was killed alongside him. ‌The prime ‍minister’s address to​ the pro-Iran militias acknowledged the significance of this anniversary and the wounds it reopened.

While the prime minister’s comments ‌indicate a desire to ⁤end the presence of the international coalition, analysts ‌suggest that political cross-pressures‍ make a complete‍ ouster of US forces unlikely. Iran, ⁢in particular, ‌benefits financially from its relationship‌ with Iraq and is hesitant to risk losing ​that source⁣ of income. The​ potential for economic pressure and sanctions on Iraq ​also discourages an outright escalation of tensions between​ Iraq ⁤and the‌ United States.

Despite these complexities, the prime minister affirms the government’s commitment to ending the presence of ‍the⁢ international​ coalition once‍ the justifications for their‍ presence have⁣ ceased.

Currently, approximately⁤ 2,500 US military personnel are stationed ⁢in Iraq as part⁣ of the coalition’s efforts to⁢ defeat the Islamic⁢ State. In November 2023 alone, these⁢ forces⁢ conducted​ 24 partnered operations ​resulting ⁤in the ‍elimination of three ISIS operatives and the detention of 14 others. These efforts continue amidst increased attacks by Iranian proxies within the Iraqi security system ⁢and the ongoing conflict between⁣ Israel and ​Hamas.

Ultimately, ‍the future ⁣of the US-led⁣ coalition ⁢in Iraq remains uncertain as political‍ dynamics and regional interests continue to shape the situation.

How has the presence of foreign‌ military‍ forces in Iraq fueled tensions and allowed militias to operate with impunity?

Necessary actions to protect its forces. However, al-Sudani and other Iraqi⁣ officials argue that the presence of foreign military forces is fueling tensions and allowing militias to operate ⁢with impunity.

‌Shifting Dynamics and Growing Iranian Influence

Since the US-led‍ invasion in 2003, Iraq has been⁤ grappling with an ‌unstable political ‍landscape and ongoing security challenges. The country​ has seen a rise in Iranian influence, ⁢with pro-Iranian militias gaining power‍ and⁣ strategically positioning themselves within‌ the⁢ Iraqi political sphere. This ⁤growing influence has caused⁢ concern ⁣among not only⁤ the United States but also neighboring countries in the region who fear the ⁢emergence of a proxy state ⁤controlled by Iran.

Although the Islamic State has been largely defeated, the presence of foreign military forces has become a contentious issue within Iraq. Many Iraqis⁣ view the continued presence of these forces as an infringement on their sovereignty and a reminder of the country’s‌ troubled history with ​foreign intervention. The ​government’s decision to pursue the withdrawal of the US-led coalition forces signals a shift in ‌power dynamics and a desire for greater autonomy.

​ Potential Consequences and Challenges

While the Iraqi ⁤government’s intention to withdraw US-led coalition forces may be seen as a step towards reclaiming national sovereignty, it also presents a number ⁤of challenges and potential‍ consequences. The absence of international coalition forces could create a ⁢power vacuum, further exacerbating the security situation in Iraq and potentially allowing extremist ⁢groups to regain strength.

Additionally, the withdrawal of​ these forces ⁣may have ripple effects on regional dynamics. The United⁤ States and its allies have been key players in maintaining stability in the region and countering Iranian ⁣influence. The departure of the US-led coalition may prompt a reshuffling of alliances and a reassessment of regional security arrangements.

Balancing National Sovereignty and Security

The Iraqi government’s decision to withdraw US-led coalition forces reflects a broader struggle to balance national sovereignty with⁤ the ⁢need for security and stability. Iraq has long been torn between the interests of various regional⁣ and international actors, and finding a ​delicate equilibrium has⁢ proven challenging.

Prime​ Minister al-Sudani has acknowledged the importance of maintaining a strong ​relationship with the United States while‌ also emphasizing the need for Iraq to assert its independence. Negotiations and discussions between the two countries will be crucial in determining the timeline and conditions of the withdrawal, ‌ensuring a smooth transition and mitigating any potential security risks.

Conclusion

The signal from Iraq’s prime minister that the government is actively working towards the withdrawal of US-led coalition forces ‌underscores the shifting dynamics in the ⁢country. It reflects Iraqi aspirations for complete national ⁣sovereignty and autonomy, while also raising concerns about the potential consequences and security challenges that may arise.

The withdrawal of⁣ these forces will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for‍ Iraq, the region, and the broader fight against extremism. It is essential that the Iraqi government and its international ‍partners navigate this transition carefully, prioritizing both national sovereignty and security to ensure a ‌stable and prosperous future for Iraq.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker