Youngkin’s failure to veto the ERIC Bill would grant Virginia’s voter roll data to left-wing activists
Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin’s Decision on Democrat Bill Sparks Controversy
Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin is facing a crucial decision that could have significant implications for Virginia’s voter roll data. A Democrat bill, known as SB 606, aims to grant access to this data to the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), a left-leaning elections group. ERIC, founded by far-left activist David Becker, has been criticized for prioritizing new voter registrations over cleaning up existing voter rolls.
Under ERIC’s membership agreement, member states are required to submit all active and inactive voter files, motor vehicle database records, and other voter registration-related data. ERIC then compares this information with data from other member states to compile updated voter-roll information.
However, concerns about the confidentiality of voter information and the controversial sharing of data with outside organizations have led Virginia to exit the ERIC program. The state has entered into interstate voter data-sharing agreements with six other states to replace ERIC’s functions.
Despite these concerns, SB 606 seeks to reverse Virginia’s decision to exit ERIC and force the state to rejoin the program. The bill passed along party lines, with Democrats supporting and Republicans opposing.
As the deadline for his decision approaches, Gov. Youngkin’s stance on SB 606 remains uncertain. During his campaign, Youngkin emphasized the importance of election integrity, making this decision a critical test of his commitment to that issue.
While ERIC has been portrayed as nonpartisan, its ties to the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR) raise questions about its neutrality. CEIR, a nonprofit founded by Becker, received significant funding from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg during the 2020 election. These funds were used to promote Democrat-backed voting policies, leading to concerns about the integrity of the election process.
CEIR’s relationship with ERIC further raises concerns. ERIC submits voter-roll data to CEIR, which then curates targeted mailing lists for voter registration outreach. This transactional relationship between ERIC and CEIR suggests a partisan agenda.
Gov. Youngkin has until March 8 to decide whether he will veto SB 606, a decision that could have far-reaching consequences for Virginia’s election integrity.
About the Author
Shawn Fleetwood is a staff writer for The Federalist and a graduate of the University of Mary Washington. His work has been featured in various outlets, including RealClearPolitics and Conservative Review. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood.
What safeguards and protocols should be in place to protect the security of Virginia’s voter data if it were to be shared with ERIC or similar organizations
A from other sources, such as the Social Security Administration and U.S. Postal Service, to identify potential duplicate registrations or ineligible voters. While this may seem like a practical and efficient method of ensuring the integrity of the voter rolls, there are serious concerns about the potential misuse and security risks associated with granting ERIC access to Virginia’s voter data.
First and foremost, it is important to note that Virginia’s voter data is a sensitive and private information that should be handled with utmost care and caution. Granting a partisan organization like ERIC access to this data raises red flags about their intentions and the potential for misuse. It is crucial to maintain transparency and ensure that any organization with access to voter data is non-partisan and operates with the sole objective of upholding the integrity of the electoral process.
Furthermore, there have been instances in the past where ERIC has faced allegations of bias and manipulation. In 2017, it was revealed that ERIC had wrongly identified over 15,000 voters in Colorado as non-citizens, leading to their removal from the voter rolls. This incident highlights the potential for errors and inaccuracies that could result in the wrongful disenfranchisement of eligible voters.
Additionally, concerns have been raised about the security of Virginia’s voter data if it were to be shared with ERIC. With instances of cyberattacks and data breaches becoming increasingly common, it is paramount to prioritize the protection of sensitive information. Granting access to a third-party organization like ERIC raises questions about the potential vulnerabilities and the safeguards in place to prevent unauthorized access or misuse of this data.
Given these concerns, it is imperative for Gov. Youngkin to carefully evaluate the implications and potential risks associated with granting ERIC access to Virginia’s voter data. The decision should be made with the utmost consideration for the privacy and security of this information, as well as the potential impact on the integrity and fairness of the electoral process.
The controversy surrounding this decision reflects the broader divide between Democrats and Republicans on issues of election integrity. While Democrats argue that increased access to voter data is necessary to identify and address potential discrepancies, Republicans emphasize the need for strict protocols and safeguards to prevent misuse and protect voter privacy.
Ultimately, Gov. Youngkin’s decision on SB 606 will have far-reaching implications for Virginia’s voter roll data and the state’s electoral process as a whole. It is crucial that this decision is made after careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits, and with a strong commitment to upholding the integrity and fairness of the electoral system.
In conclusion, the decision by Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin on the Democrat bill SB 606 has sparked significant controversy. The potential consequences of granting access to Virginia’s voter roll data to a partisan organization like ERIC are vast, including concerns about privacy, security, and potential errors. Gov. Youngkin must prioritize the protection of voter data and the integrity of the electoral process when making his decision.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
