Hunter Biden declines GOP deposition request
OAN’s Stella Escobedo
12:35 PM – Wednesday, December 13, 2023
Hunter Biden’s refusal to sit for Republican’s closed-door deposition is causing quite a stir. One America’s Stella Escobedo had an intriguing conversation about it with criminal defense attorney David Gelman.
The U.S. Supreme Court orders President Trump’s legal team to respond to Special Counsel Jack Smith’s petition regarding presidential immunity by December 20th.
In an exclusive interview, Florida Congressman Greg Steube shares his thoughts on the pending Foreign Intelligence And Surveillance Act and impeachment inquiry votes.
Hunter Biden’s refusal to sit for Republican’s closed-door deposition is raising lots of questions.
Congress is reevaluating the presence of whole milk in school cafeterias.
Tesla is recalling just over two million vehicles in the United States equipped with its Autopilot advanced driver-assistance system to implement new safety measures.
Netflix is poised to surpass Disney+ in the competition for U.S. advertising revenue next year as price increases and a crackdown on password-sharing attract more viewers to its ad-supported plan.
Microsoft and the AFL-CIO union federation have reached an agreement in which the software giant will remain neutral in union efforts to encourage workers to join.
Amazon.com seeks the dismissal of a U.S. government antitrust lawsuit that accuses the company of employing illegal strategies to boost profits in its online retail empire.
rnrn
What are the legal implications of Hunter Biden’s refusal to testify in a closed-door deposition?
Hunter Biden’s Refusal to Testify Sparks Controversy and Speculation
In a recent development, Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, has refused to sit for a closed-door deposition requested by Republicans. This decision has garnered significant attention and sparked intense debate. One America’s journalist, Stella Escobedo, had an intriguing conversation about this matter with criminal defense attorney David Gelman.
The refusal by Hunter Biden to testify in a closed-door deposition has raised questions about transparency and accountability. Republicans have been pushing for answers regarding his involvement in various controversial business dealings, particularly his role in Ukrainian and Chinese companies while his father was vice president.
Critics argue that Hunter Biden’s refusal to testify raises suspicions and fuels speculation. They assert that the lack of cooperation may suggest an attempt to conceal potentially damaging information. On the other hand, supporters of Hunter Biden argue that this refusal is well within his rights and emphasize the importance of due process.
Stella Escobedo spoke with criminal defense attorney David Gelman to gain insights into the legal implications of Hunter Biden’s decision. Gelman highlighted that individuals, even public figures, have the right to decline testimony, particularly if there are concerns about self-incrimination or potential legal repercussions. He also mentioned that the decision to refuse testimony in a closed-door setting might be a strategic one, considering the political climate surrounding the controversy.
However, Gelman also emphasized the potential consequences of such a refusal. He explained that public perception plays a crucial role in such high-profile cases, and opting not to testify could affect how Hunter Biden is perceived by the public and impact his credibility. Additionally, Gelman noted that refusal to testify may invite further scrutiny and speculation, leading to a prolonged controversy.
The conversation between Stella Escobedo and David Gelman sheds light on the legal complexities and implications surrounding Hunter Biden’s refusal to testify. It highlights the delicate balance between an individual’s rights and the public’s right to transparency and accountability.
As the controversy continues, it remains to be seen whether Hunter Biden’s refusal to testify will have a significant impact on ongoing investigations and the public’s perception of him. The lack of cooperation may only serve to fuel further speculation and scrutiny. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the legal system to determine the truth and hold individuals accountable, regardless of their political affiliations.
In conclusion, Hunter Biden’s refusal to sit for a closed-door deposition has caused a stir and divided public opinion. It raises questions about transparency, accountability, and the limits of an individual’s right to decline testimony. The insights provided by criminal defense attorney David Gelman shed light on the legal implications and potential consequences of this decision. As the controversy unfolds, it is crucial to maintain a fair and impartial approach in evaluating the facts and ensuring justice prevails.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
