How ‘Squad’ Democrats and Republican Thomas Massie united for years in Israel opposition
Rep. Thomas Massie Faces Criticism for Breaking Ranks with Republican Party on Israel
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) has been at the center of controversy in recent weeks for consistently diverging from the Republican Party on votes related to Israel. This has drawn sharp criticism, particularly following the Hamas terrorist attack against Israel on Oct. 7.
The self-identified libertarian Massie has been aligning himself with Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), and other pro-Palestinian members of the so-called “Squad” when it comes to Israel, which has raised eyebrows among his Republican colleagues.
Breaking Party Lines
In 2019, Massie voted alongside the Squad in opposing a resolution condemning the anti-Zionist Boycott Divestment and Sanctions movement, a stance that set him apart as the only Republican among the 17 dissenters in the House.
In 2022, Massie once again found himself standing alone in opposition to a House resolution condemning antisemitism, which passed with an overwhelming 420 votes.
More recently, Massie has aligned himself with progressives on the three most recent bills following the Israel-Hamas war.
Controversial Votes
On Oct. 25, Massie joined nine Democrats in opposing a resolution condemning Hamas, despite its overwhelming passage with 412 votes. Massie justified his opposition by calling the recommendation of sanctions a “prelude to war.”
Massie also voted against condemning support of Hamas and Hezbollah on college campuses on Nov. 2, arguing that “free speech means protecting speech you don’t like, not just speech you do like.”
On the same day, he voted against a $14.3 billion aid package to Israel for its war in Gaza, questioning why Israel receives more foreign aid than any other country and suggesting it is due to the influence of aggressive lobbyists.
Facing Backlash
The United Democracy Project, a PAC affiliated with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, launched an attack advertisement against Massie, urging his constituents to voice their complaints by contacting his office.
Massie shared the ad and the UDP’s petition against him on X, reaffirming his stance against foreign aid spending and vowing not to vote in favor of allocating funds to Israel.
“I won’t vote to give them your $,” said Massie on X.
What are some of the arguments made against Thomas Massie’s decision to vote against resolutions expressing support for Israel?
Hida Tlaib (D-MI), and Ilhan Omar (D-MN) in voting against resolutions that express support for Israel. These resolutions, which are largely non-binding, serve as symbolic gestures of solidarity with the Israeli government. Massie’s decision to break ranks with his own party has sparked a heated debate within both the Republican Party and the larger political landscape.
One of the main reasons behind Massie’s divergence from the Republican Party on this issue is his libertarian ideology. Libertarians, like Massie, prioritize individual freedom and non-interventionism, which often clash with the interventionist policies typically associated with supporting Israel. For Massie, voting against these resolutions is consistent with his broader libertarian beliefs and his commitment to a non-interventionist foreign policy.
However, Massie’s stance has drawn criticism from within his own party. Many Republicans argue that voting against these resolutions undermines Israel and weakens the United States’ relationship with a key ally in the Middle East. They argue that supporting Israel is not only necessary for regional stability but also for the protection of U.S. interests in the region. Furthermore, they contend that expressing solidarity with Israel is a moral imperative, given the country’s unique status as the only democracy in the Middle East.
Critics of Massie’s position also argue that his alignment with progressive Democrats raises questions about his larger political agenda. By voting alongside Ocasio-Cortez, Tlaib, and Omar, Massie is seen as endorsing their criticisms of the Israeli government, which are often accused of crossing the line into anti-Semitism. Some argue that Massie’s voting record on Israel could be a strategic move to build political alliances and appeal to a wider base of voters, including libertarians, progressives, and anti-Israel activists.
On the other hand, supporters of Massie argue that his decision to break ranks with the Republican Party on this issue demonstrates his commitment to principle over party loyalty. They argue that Massie’s vote should be celebrated as a sign of independence and integrity, rather than criticized. They also point out that his position is consistent with the libertarian opposition to foreign aid and military intervention, a stance that he has consistently held throughout his political career.
The controversy surrounding Massie’s divergence from the Republican Party on Israel highlights larger divisions within the party and the broader political landscape. It raises important questions about the future of the Republican Party, particularly in relation to issues of foreign policy and the role of individual politicians within the party. It also brings attention to the ongoing debates surrounding U.S. support for Israel and the complexities of navigating global politics.
Ultimately, whether Massie’s actions will have long-term political consequences remains to be seen. It is unclear whether his position will gain traction within the Republican Party or if it will be seen as an outlier. Regardless, his divergence from the party line on Israel serves as a reminder of the complexities and divisions within American politics, particularly on issues related to foreign policy and international relations.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
