House votes against Biden’s ‘EV Mandate’ as 5 Democrats join Republicans
House Votes to Strike Down Biden’s ‘EV Mandate’ as 5 Democrats Side with Republicans
The House of Representatives passed a legislation on Wednesday aimed at blocking an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that critics argue is a sneaky attempt to force Americans into buying electric vehicles. The Choice in Automobile Retail Sales Act received a 221-197 vote in favor, with five Democrats joining 216 Republicans, according to Fox News.
The legislation was a response to an EPA regulation that the White House claims could result in a vehicle market where 67 percent of new sedan, crossover, SUV, and light truck purchases would have to be electric by 2032 in order to comply with tailpipe emission rules. The Biden administration estimated that by 2032, half of new bus and garbage truck purchases could also be electric to meet compliance requirements.
If you drive a gas-powered vehicle, the Biden Administration is coming for your car keys.
Today, House Republicans will pass the CARS Act to protect American consumers from the EPA’s woke EV mandate. pic.twitter.com/oeksw9gUiv
— Rep. Andrew Clyde (@Rep_Clyde) December 6, 2023
Republican Rep. Tim Walberg of Michigan, along with Republican Rep. Andrew Clyde of Georgia, drafted the CARS Act. Walberg argued that the EPA rule is unattainable, unaffordable, and unrealistic, as reported by The Hill. He emphasized the importance of choice, stating that the rule takes away a fundamental principle of Americanism.
Walberg hailed the passage of the CARS Act as a significant victory for consumers and the American auto industry. He criticized Biden’s mandate as unrealistic and a demonstration of how central planning and Bidenomics do not work. Walberg stressed that mandating electric vehicles has never been a responsible or affordable solution. He expressed the importance of preserving the opportunity for Americans to choose the car that best suits their needs.
According to Walberg, car dealers recognize the flaws in the rule. He highlighted that nearly 4,000 car dealers recently sent a letter to the Biden administration, urging them to reconsider the EV mandate due to a lack of consumer demand. Walberg believes that the passage of the CARS Act demonstrates that the House is listening to these concerns.
Fox News pointed out that even supporters of electric vehicles considered the rule a mistake. John Bozzella, the CEO of Alliance for Automotive Innovation, stated that the proposed standards would significantly increase vehicle costs, limit consumer choice, and disadvantage a large portion of the population. He argued that the stringent greenhouse gas and pollutant standards effectively impose a battery electric vehicle mandate.
“Heavy-handed, carrot-and-stick government intervention in the U.S. automobile industry and consumer markets to advance unproven technology remains an egregious use of regulatory power. We encourage members to support the CARS Act and reign in the runaway EPA.” – @Protectaxpayers
— Tom Emmer (@GOPMajorityWhip) December 6, 2023
Aaron Ringel, Vice President of Government Relations at the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, argued that the EPA rules benefit China more than America. He claimed that banning certain vehicle and fuel technologies based on a single category of emissions is unlawful, illogical, and detrimental to consumers, families, and national security. Ringel warned that it would trade energy security for dependence on China.
The CARS Act will now move to the Democrat-controlled Senate. The White House has stated that if the legislation passes the Senate, President Joe Biden will veto it.
The post House Votes to Strike Down Biden’s ‘EV Mandate’ as 5 Democrats Side with Republicans appeared first on The Western Journal.
How does the lack of widespread charging infrastructure limit the feasibility of transitioning to electric vehicles on a large scale, according to the concerns raised by car dealers and consumers
T the concerns raised by car dealers and consumers are being heard and addressed.
The EPA’s regulation, according to critics, not only infringes upon the principle of choice but also poses a financial burden on American consumers. The cost of electric vehicles remains significantly higher than that of their gasoline counterparts, making them inaccessible for many Americans. Additionally, the lack of widespread charging infrastructure further limits the feasibility of transitioning to electric vehicles on such a large scale.
The five Democrats who joined Republicans in voting for the CARS Act echoed these concerns. They recognized the importance of consumer choice and the potential financial strain caused by the EPA’s rule. Their bipartisan support for the legislation reflects a growing recognition that a one-size-fits-all approach to vehicle emissions may not be in the best interest of the American people.
The passage of the CARS Act is a significant setback for the Biden administration’s plan to rapidly transition to electric vehicles. It sends a clear message that forcing Americans into electric vehicles is not a viable solution. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of market-driven choices that allow consumers to decide which vehicles best suit their needs and preferences.
Critics of the legislation argue that it undermines efforts to combat climate change. However, proponents of the CARS Act maintain that there are alternative ways to address emissions without imposing costly mandates on American consumers. These alternatives include investing in innovative technologies and infrastructure, incentivizing the development and adoption of cleaner vehicles, and promoting consumer education on the benefits of electric vehicles.
While the debate on the role of electric vehicles in a sustainable future continues, the House’s vote to strike down Biden’s ’EV mandate’ reflects the plurality of opinions within Congress. It demonstrates the importance of considering the economic implications and individual freedoms when formulating policies aimed at addressing climate change.
As the legislation heads to the Senate, its fate remains uncertain. However, the bipartisan support it received in the House serves as a reminder that the pursuit of sustainable solutions should take into account the concerns and needs of the American people.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
