GOP Exposes Feds’ Censorship-Industrial Complex
The federal government’s censorship-industrial complex poses a grave threat to Americans’ First Amendment rights, according to witnesses who testified during a House subcommittee hearing on Wednesday.
Independent reporter Michael Shellenberger stated that the federal government not only participated but also spearheaded a massive flagging and censorship operation, working in tandem with Big Tech platforms to suppress dissenting voices.
The hearing, titled “Censorship Laundering Part II: Preventing the Department of Homeland Security’s Silencing of Dissent,” held by the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability, examined the extensive collaboration between federal agencies and Big Tech platforms to stifle Americans who questioned the government’s claims. Representative Dan Bishop, R-N.C., the subcommittee chair, emphasized the role of the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), a subagency within the Department of Homeland Security, in orchestrating this censorship campaign.
Representative Bishop raised concerns about the potential overreach of DHS, questioning whether they would extend their jurisdiction beyond elections to censor more Americans under the guise of protecting critical infrastructure.
CISA, often referred to as the nerve center of the federal government’s censorship complex, facilitates meetings between Big Tech companies and national security and law enforcement agencies to combat misinformation on social media platforms. Prior to the 2020 election, the agency intensified its censorship efforts by flagging posts for Big Tech companies, targeting content that questioned the security of voting practices such as unsupervised mail-in voting.
An interim report released by House Republicans last month revealed that CISA’s censorship enterprise was even more extensive than previously known. The report exposed the collusion between CISA, the State Department’s Global Engagement Center (GEC), and Stanford University to pressure Big Tech companies into censoring what they deemed as ”disinformation” during the 2020 election. At the center of this operation was the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), a consortium of disinformation academics led by the Stanford Internet Observatory, which worked with DHS and GEC to monitor and censor Americans’ online speech leading up to the election.
EIP, created at the request of CISA, allowed federal officials to carry out their censorship activities while evading public scrutiny and First Amendment protections. The interim report revealed that this operation aimed to censor true information, jokes, satire, and political opinions, specifically targeting prominent conservative figures like Mollie Hemingway and Sean Davis from The Federalist.
[RELATED:[RELATED:State Of Texas Joins The Federalist, Daily Wire In Suing The Federal Censorship-Industrial Complex]
The hearing also shed light on the ongoing court case Missouri v. Biden, which exposes the Biden administration’s attempts to coerce Big Tech platforms into engaging in similar censorship activities. Mark Chenoweth, president of the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), testified about how the federal government pressured social media platforms to censor Americans expressing rational and scientifically accurate views on COVID-19 and vaccines, thereby violating their First Amendment rights. NCLA represents the individual plaintiffs in Missouri v. Biden.
Chenoweth emphasized that when the government coerces or pressures companies to crush private individuals’ speech, it constitutes state action and is prohibited by the First Amendment.
During the hearing, CISA officials avoided answering questions from Republicans about changes in their efforts to combat disinformation in recent years. When asked by Representative Bishop about the evolution of CISA’s practices since the 2020 election, agency official Iranga Kahangama evaded giving a direct response.
Despite overwhelming evidence, House Democrats attempted to deny the existence of the federal government’s censorship activities. Representative Glenn Ivey, a Democrat from Maryland, dismissed the evidence of CISA’s role in the censorship-industrial complex, citing a quote from a CISA official as proof that the agency does not engage in censorship. Similarly, Representative Yvette Clarke, a Democrat from New York, falsely claimed that there is no evidence of CISA’s involvement in any unconstitutional or nefarious activities.
rnrn
How has the fear of governmental censorship impacted Americans’ willingness to express their opinions and engage in open dialogue?
Ght on the chilling effect of this censorship-industrial complex. Witnesses testified that due to the fear of being censored or flagged by the government, many Americans are self-censoring their speech and withholding their opinions, thus stifling free expression and open dialogue.
Furthermore, the collusion between federal agencies and Big Tech platforms is deeply concerning. It raises questions about the influence the government has over these private companies and the extent to which they are willing to cooperate in suppressing dissenting voices. This collusion creates a dangerous precedent where the government can effectively control the narrative and shape public discourse, undermining the principles of a free and democratic society.
The report released by House Republicans exposed the extent of this censorship enterprise, revealing the targeted censorship of content that challenged the government’s claims, particularly during the 2020 election. This raises concerns about the infringement of Americans’ right to question and criticize their government, a fundamental aspect of a healthy democracy.
The creation of the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP) further demonstrates the government’s attempts to control online speech. EIP allowed federal officials to carry out their censorship activities behind closed doors, evading public scrutiny and bypassing First Amendment protections. The targeting of conservative figures like Mollie Hemingway and Sean Davis from The Federalist highlights the partisan nature of this censorship operation, further eroding trust in the government’s commitment to fair and unbiased censorship practices.
It is essential to recognize the implications of this censorship-industrial complex on Americans’ First Amendment rights. The freedom to express dissenting opinions, challenge government narratives, and engage in open dialogue is crucial in a democratic society. However, the collaboration between federal agencies and Big Tech platforms poses a grave threat to these rights, as witnessed by the chilling effect and targeted censorship uncovered.
In conclusion, the federal government’s censorship-industrial complex poses a significant threat to Americans’ First Amendment rights. The collusion between federal agencies and Big Tech platforms, as well as the targeted censorship of dissenting voices, undermines the principles of a free and democratic society. It is essential to address and challenge this threat to protect the fundamental right to free expression and open dialogue for all Americans.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
