GOP House Members Assist Democrats in Maintaining ‘Kill Switch’ Requirement That May Disable Your Vehicle
House Republicans failed to defund a federal “kill switch” mandate Tuesday night requiring all vehicles produced in 2026 and onward to feature technology that can automatically disable the vehicle “if impairment is detected.” This lays the groundwork for corporate and government access to monitor and interfere with personal movement.
By a vote of 229 to 201, the lower chamber rejected an amendment proposed by Kentucky Republican Rep. Thomas Massie to defund the mandate embedded in the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Massie’s measure received 210 “no” votes from Democrats and 19 from Republicans. Just two Democrats supported the amendment and 199 Republicans voted for it. Eight members did not participate in the late-night vote.
During debate last night on my amendment to defund the 2026 kill-switch mandate for cars, some Democrats claimed the technology wouldn’t monitor or disable cars. Here’s the actual law I had to read to them:
My amendment failed. Link to the roll call vote: https://t.co/YWufj9C2C3 pic.twitter.com/JDN1TltaDo
The 2021 infrastructure law passed by Congress requires car manufactures to include “advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology” as “standard equipment” in vehicles. The provision requires such technology to “passively monitor the performance of a driver” and “prevent or limit motor vehicle operation if an impairment is detected.” In other words, manufacturers will be required to implement a “kill switch” mechanism on cars that can disable the vehicle based on performance.
[LISTEN:[LISTEN:The Dystopic Power Grab Nobody Is Talking About]
USA Today sought to downplay the 2021 infrastructure bill’s “kill switch” provision with a January “fact check” labeling the warnings from Massie and others as “false.”
“Automobile experts told USA TODAY the bill does not direct a kill switch to be implemented in cars, nor does it give any third parties, including law enforcement or government officials, access to the in-vehicle technology,” USA Today reported. The paper’s next sentence read, “Rather, the bill in question directs a federal agency to require technology that would detect driver impairment and disable the vehicle in that scenario.” This leaves the question of how all new vehicles will function up to the discretion of unelected bureaucrats in Washington, who could push manufacturers in dramatic directions.
The Associated Press also published a “fact check” on the issue in March last year accusing online commentators of “distorting” the law’s meaning. The AP concluded the term “kill switch” amounts to “hyperbole” because “none of the options being considered would include the risky move of lurching a fast-moving vehicle to an abrupt stop.”
Haha, AP fact check hinges on this: “He said the term ‘kill switch’ is hyperbole, since none of the options being considered would include the risky move of lurching a fast-moving vehicle to an abrupt stop” & assurances of data privacy. https://t.co/5yyX1LrCFA pic.twitter.com/8EdpfJKMMt
The introduction of a “kill switch” on all new vehicles coincides with a growing push among the far left to limit freedom of movement. Often citing climate change as justification for new measures to limit transit, policymakers from California to the United Kingdom have introduced rules that would curb the use of private vehicles. On the West Coast, the California Air Resources Board came out with new regulations last summer to ban gasoline-powered car sales by 2035. One week later, California Gov. Gavin Newsom begged residents not to charge electric vehicles during a heat wave so the power grid would not become overwhelmed.
After Massie’s amendment failed, Hillsdale Professor Matthew Meehan posted on X, “Waves up the beach. This kill switch has got to be stopped.” (Meehan previously broke down the “kill switch” bill on the Federalist Radio Hour.)
[RELATED:[RELATED:Anti-Air Travel Climate Psychos Want To Abolish Freedom Of Movement]
Tristan Justice is the western correspondent for The Federalist and the author of Social Justice Redux, a conservative newsletter on culture, health, and wellness. He has also written for The Washington Examiner and The Daily Signal. His work has also been featured in Real Clear Politics and Fox News. Tristan graduated from George Washington University where he majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow him on Twitter at @JusticeTristan or contact him at [email protected]. Sign up for Tristan’s email newsletter here.
, this PAA focuses on House Republicans’ failure to defund the mandate, and the implications of the controversial technology. Here are three PAA related questions for this topic:
House Republicans failed to defund a federal “kill switch” mandate requiring all vehicles produced in 2026 and onward to feature technology that can automatically disable the vehicle “if impairment is detected.” This controversial mandate paves the way for corporate and government access to monitor and interfere with personal movement.
The amendment to defund the mandate, proposed by Kentucky Republican Rep. Thomas Massie, was rejected by a vote of 229 to 201 in the lower chamber. The measure received 210 “no” votes from Democrats and 19 from Republicans. Only two Democrats supported the amendment, while 199 Republicans voted in favor. Eight members chose not to participate in the vote.
Massie took to social media to express his disappointment with the outcome. He shared the actual law that he had to read during the debate on his amendment, highlighting the fact that some Democrats claimed the technology wouldn’t monitor or disable cars. The roll call vote results were also shared for transparency.
The 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act passed by Congress mandates car manufacturers to include “advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology” as standard equipment in vehicles. This technology is required to passively monitor a driver’s performance and prevent or limit motor vehicle operation if impairment is detected. In simpler terms, manufacturers will be obligated to implement a “kill switch” mechanism that can disable the vehicle based on driver performance.
However
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
