The federalist

Coal State Governor Leads West’s Decarbonization Efforts

Republicans Embrace ‌Carbon Sequestration⁢ as Climate Change ⁣Solution

Carbon sequestration⁢ has become the go-to solution ‍for‌ Republicans when it comes to addressing climate change. GOP governors in western states are leading‌ the charge by storing concentrated CO2 underground. However, Wyoming​ Governor Mark Gordon, who chairs the Western Governors Association, may⁣ be leading his state down the wrong path.

Last week, lawmakers in Wyoming heard from members of the CO2 Coalition who challenged Governor Gordon’s commitment to decarbonize the ‍state. Dr. William‍ Happer, founder of the CO2 Coalition, even compared these efforts to a “religion” during‍ a Senate committee hearing.

“If you look around, you need something bigger than yourself ⁣to ​make your life worthwhile,” Happer said. “What’s bigger than saving the planet? The problem is the planet doesn’t need saving.”

The hearing featured testimony from Happer, along with the ​coalition’s ​executive director, Dr. Gregory Wrightstone, and Frits Byron Soepyan, a ⁤chemical ⁣engineer. ‌Other⁤ notable members of ‌the⁤ CO2 ​Coalition’s board, including Drs. Patrick Moore and John Clauser, did not ‌testify ‌at the hearing.

“Let ⁤me just address this‍ 1.5-degree narrative,” Wrightstone said.

It’s already warmed 1.2 degrees. So, of ‍that 1.5, it’s warmed 1.2. So, what they’re telling you is beware of ‌three-tenths of a degree centigrade ⁣of warming which ⁣equates to half a degree Fahrenheit. It’s just changed half a degree Fahrenheit in‍ this room recently,‌ you’ve never noticed it. It wouldn’t trigger the‍ thermostats on or off. It changes more than half ‌a degree Fahrenheit between 11 ⁤a.m. and‍ noon on almost every single day, and if you’re that worried⁣ about half a​ degree Fahrenheit of warming, you can⁤ move 19 miles farther north and your average ‌temperature will ⁤drop half a degree ⁢Fahrenheit. That’s what they’re warning us about.

Last week’s proceedings were held in response to Governor Gordon’s decision to back out of a debate with the coalition that he had previously agreed to. This ⁤move has caused disagreement among legislators in Wyoming.

“It is ‌no​ secret that many legislators disagree with the governor and his stance and policies regarding CO2,” said Sen. Cheri Steinmetz, the chair of the​ committee. “However, this meeting is strictly about​ CO2 ‌and​ related policy issues, and in no way intended to be personal in any way to the governor.”

Decarbonizing The West

The forum was organized to protest Governor Gordon’s “decarbonizing the West” initiative, which he declared a top priority while leading the Western Governors Association. In a speech at Harvard University, Gordon proudly stated, “We are ⁤the first state that has said we are going to be carbon negative.”

“You can’t ⁣really do that without direct air capture or somehow doing carbon ⁣capture and sequestration,” Gordon explained. He is betting on new technology embraced ⁣by Republican governors across the‍ country. Other governors, like Alaska’s Mike Dunleavy, have also introduced legislative packages to capitalize on ⁣carbon markets and implement carbon capture⁣ programs.

In North and South Dakota, Republican governors Doug Burgum and Kristi Noem have championed carbon capture projects. ⁣Burgum stated, “Today, we’re on our way toward achieving carbon neutrality as a ⁤state by 2030.” These initiatives aim to secure the future​ of energy​ and​ agriculture industries.

While carbon sequestration has⁣ its risks, such as the explosion in Mississippi that caused mass poisoning, there are alternative methods like⁢ biological carbon sequestration. This involves absorbing carbon dioxide into soils, oceans,⁢ grasslands, and forests through⁣ responsible land management.

It’s worth noting that hundreds of scientists ‍dispute ⁢the urgency of carbon dioxide as an existential threat. In fact, one of ⁤the‌ CO2 Coalition’s board members, Nobel laureate John ⁣Clauser, signed a ‍declaration stating that the climate⁢ “emergency” is a myth.

Furthermore, ‌increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere‍ has been shown to promote forest growth, known as the “greening” effect. This challenges the notion‌ that carbon dioxide is solely detrimental to‍ the⁢ environment.


⁤ What are the differing ⁣perspectives on carbon sequestration as a solution to climate change?

‍D ‍climate change and the differing perspectives surrounding it.”

Carbon sequestration⁢, or the​ process of capturing and storing carbon dioxide⁣ from the atmosphere, has gained traction​ as a favored solution‍ for⁢ Republicans when addressing climate change. Republican governors in western states, particularly Wyoming’s Governor Mark ​Gordon, have taken ⁣the lead in implementing projects‌ to store concentrated CO2 underground. However, Governor Gordon’s commitment to decarbonization has faced criticism from members of the​ CO2 Coalition.

Recently, ‍lawmakers in Wyoming held a hearing to discuss ​Governor Gordon’s approach‍ to decarbonization. ⁢Dr. William ⁣Happer, founder of the CO2 Coalition, went as⁢ far⁢ as likening these efforts⁣ to a “religion,” expressing his ⁤skepticism ‍during a Senate committee hearing. He stated,⁢ “If you look around, you need something⁣ bigger than yourself to make your life worthwhile. What’s bigger than saving the planet? ⁢The problem is the planet‍ doesn’t need saving.”

The hearing included testimony from⁢ Dr. Happer, as ‌well as Dr. Gregory Wrightstone, the coalition’s​ executive director, and Frits Byron Soepyan, a chemical ​engineer. Notably absent were other prominent members of the CO2 Coalition’s⁢ board, including Drs.⁢ Patrick Moore and John Clauser.

During‍ his testimony, ‍Dr. Wrightstone ​addressed‌ the narrative surrounding the 1.5-degree target ​for global warming. He argued that the temperature has⁢ already ​increased by 1.2 ⁤degrees, ​downplaying the significance of ‍the remaining three-tenths of a degree centigrade. He emphasized ​that such a small change⁤ in temperature would not be noticeable ‌in day-to-day life.

The hearing was a response to Governor Gordon’s decision to withdraw from a⁤ previously ⁤agreed ‍debate with the CO2 Coalition. This move‌ has caused disagreement among​ legislators in Wyoming, with some expressing their disagreement⁣ with⁣ the governor’s stance ⁣and policies ⁢on CO2.

“It is no ‌secret that many legislators disagree with the governor ⁢and his stance and ⁤policies regarding CO2,” noted Senator Cheri Steinmetz, the chair of the committee. “However, this meeting​ is ​strictly about CO2 and climate change and the ⁣differing perspectives surrounding it.”

The Republican ‌embrace of‍ carbon sequestration as a climate change solution reflects a shifting attitude ‍within the party. While Republicans have often been criticized for their reluctance to acknowledge climate change, this recent focus on carbon sequestration demonstrates a ⁣willingness to address ⁤the issue, albeit with differing opinions⁤ on ​the most effective approach.

Carbon sequestration projects, such as the storage of CO2 ‌underground, ⁣offer a practical ‌means of‌ reducing carbon emissions and mitigating the impacts of ‍climate change. These projects have the‍ potential to not only decrease greenhouse gas​ emissions but also provide economic opportunities through job creation and technological advancements.

However, critics⁢ argue that carbon‌ sequestration ⁢should not be the sole solution to climate change. They‌ emphasize the ⁢importance of reducing carbon emissions at the source by transitioning​ to renewable⁢ energy sources and implementing sustainable practices. Some⁣ suggest ‌that carbon sequestration projects ​could ​inadvertently delay the urgency ​to address ⁣the root causes of climate change.

As the ​debate continues, it ⁣is essential for policymakers to consider a ‌comprehensive approach that incorporates​ both carbon sequestration and ‍emissions​ reductions. Collaboration⁤ among stakeholders, including scientists, policymakers, industry ⁤leaders, and environmental ​advocates, is​ crucial in developing effective strategies to combat climate change.

The Republican embrace of carbon sequestration as a climate change solution highlights a growing recognition of the⁣ need⁣ to address this global challenge. While ⁣differing opinions remain, ‌the⁢ focus on carbon sequestration underscores a step toward finding common ground and working towards a sustainable ​and resilient future.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker