Governor doubtful about Wisconsin anti-grooming legislation
Governor Tony Evers of Wisconsin has expressed doubts about the state’s proposed anti-grooming legislation. Speaking on the program *UpFront*, Evers, a former teacher and state superintendent, emphasized that teachers should not be treated like law enforcement officials and cautioned against overly broad definitions that could hinder teachers from providing comfort to students in distress. He mentioned the difficulty in clearly defining “grooming” and noted that previous efforts to implement grooming reforms during his tenure as superintendent faced pushback and were ultimately abandoned. Meanwhile, Republican Representative Amanda Nedweski, who supports the legislation, criticized Evers’ stance, stating that the bill clearly protects children from predators without restricting normal supportive behavior by teachers, such as giving a child a hug. The discussion highlights ongoing debates around balancing child protection with practical considerations for educators in wisconsin.
Governor doubtful about Wisconsin anti-grooming legislation
(The Center Square) – Gov. Tony Evers isn’t on board with Wisconsin’s proposed anti-grooming legislation.
In a weekend appearance on UpFront, the governor, who is both a former teacher and a former state superintendent of schools, said he doesn’t want to turn teachers into robots.
“[Teachers] are not police officers. They are not D.A.s,” Evers said. He added he probably won’t sign the plan. “If it’s going to stop teachers from maybe putting their arm around a kid when they are hurting, probably not.”
The Cap Times reported last month that Wisconsin’s Department of Public Instruction, which Evers used to lead, investigated 200 teachers over a five-year period for grooming or sexual misconduct.
Evers said the problem is defining grooming.
“The issue of grooming is very difficult,” the governor said. “I remember when I was state superintendent, we went through some things to make [the laws] more thoughtful and helpful. But at the end of the day, grooming is something that is hard to define. And if we want it to be against the law, we need to identify what it is.”
The Cap Times last week revealed that Evers introduced grooming reforms while he was state superintendent, but those reforms were scrapped because of unidentified “pushback.”
“[It was] grooming, grooming, grooming, and then teachers will say ‘I can’t do this? I can’t do that?’” the governor added. “If we believe we can find a good definition for grooming, and it’s against the law, that will change everything. It’s just a very difficult thing to find.”
WHY DEMOCRATS’ HARD-FOUGHT REDISTRICTING WINS MAY ALL BE FOR NAUGHT
Rep. Amanda Nedweski, R-Pleasant Prairie, who is driving the anti- grooming legislation didn’t buy the governor’s reluctance.
“This statement from @GovEvers is ridiculous. Here is how grooming is defined in the bill (which he clearly has not read),” she wrote on X. “Absolutely nothing in this bill prohibits teachers from giving a kid a hug when they’re having a bad day. It’s about protecting kids from predators & abuse.”
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
