Gosnell documentary team finds success with DC climate trial ‘verbatim podcast
Inventive documentarians Ann McElhinney and Phelim McAleer have done it again, turning a story of interest to just left and right hard-liners into a national sensation.
After successes in bringing the horrors of fracking, the case against abortionist Kermit Gosnell, and the sordid Hunter Biden tale to theaters, they are producing a daily podcast on the D.C. Superior Court trial of the 12-year battle between climate change advocate Michael Mann and two who have questioned his science, Mark Steyn and Rand Simberg.
Mann is known for his “hockey stick” graph that he says shows climate change spiking from the industrial revolution to today. Steyn and Simberg mocked it years ago in the National Review and on the Competitive Enterprise Institute website, getting sued by Mann for defamation.
Now, the case has made it to a trial that continues next week.
The court does not allow cameras, so McElhinney and McAleer are producing Climate Change on Trial, a podcast that reenacts the day’s arguments. It soared up the Chartable ratings in just a few days.
“So far, we have been the No. 6 most-listened-to science podcast on the planet. I think we will be the No. 1 science podcast before the end,”
bragged McAleer of the conservative Irish couple’s project available on Apple, Spotify, Google, and other podcast sites.
He told Secrets that the case has put both climate change and free speech on trial. “It’s probably the most important free speech trial of the century,” McAleer said.
For their project, they take a transcript from the day’s trial and, overnight, have voice actors reenact key moments.
“The reenactments are performed in Los Angeles from the transcripts. We record in Washington, D.C., close to the courthouse, and it is edited overnight in Europe. So, people have the best of the courtroom drama in the inbox in the morning,” McAleer said.
He thinks they’ve landed on their latest documentary-style invention. “We have created a new genre for the podcast age — the verbatim podcast. This brings court cases to people in an accessible and entertaining way,” he said.
They have recorded nine episodes tracking the trial, with the highlight being Steyn and his lawyers questioning Mann about his science and claims to be a Nobel Prize winner.
“I think it’s incredibly popular because there is such an interest in the truth. People could smell there was something wrong with climate change alarmism, but the mainstream media wasn’t bringing them the truth,” McAleer said.
SEE THE LATEST POLITICAL NEWS AND BUZZ FROM WASHINGTON SECRETS
He added that the best place to test that is a court. “A courtroom is still a place where you are not allowed political slogans or fake alarmism. Everything has to be based on evidence or documentation. And climate scientists have to swear under oath and produce real evidence,” he said.
So far, he added, “When asked for that evidence, it just isn’t there.”
In what ways do McElhinney and McAleer’s documentaries challenge viewers to critically analyze information and form their own opinions, especially in a society deeply divided over issues like climate change
Inventive documentarians Ann McElhinney and Phelim McAleer have once again captured the attention of the nation with their latest project. In the past, they have successfully brought to light the horrors of fracking, shed light on the case against abortionist Kermit Gosnell, and shared the sordid tale of Hunter Biden. Now, they have turned their focus to the ongoing trial in the D.C. Superior Court involving climate change advocate Michael Mann and his critics Mark Steyn and Rand Simberg.
Michael Mann is renowned for his “hockey stick” graph, which he claims illustrates the dramatic spike in climate change from the industrial revolution to the present day. However, this theory was openly mocked by Steyn and Simberg several years ago in both the National Review and on the Competitive Enterprise Institute website. In response to their criticisms, Mann filed a defamation lawsuit against them.
After years of legal battles, the case has finally reached trial, which is set to continue next week. While the court does not permit cameras inside, McElhinney and McAleer are producing a daily podcast titled ”Climate Change on Trial.” Through reenactments, they bring to life the arguments presented in court each day. The podcast has quickly gained popularity, skyrocketing up the Chartable ratings within a matter of days.
This latest endeavor by McElhinney and McAleer showcases their ability to transform complex legal proceedings into captivating content accessible to the general public. By using their expertise as documentarians, they shed light on the intricacies of the trial and present the arguments in an engaging and informative manner. This podcast serves as a valuable resource for those interested in both sides of the climate change debate, offering an opportunity for listeners to gain a deeper understanding of the scientific and legal aspects at play.
In a society deeply divided over issues like climate change, McElhinney and McAleer’s work transcends political boundaries. By delving into controversial topics and presenting different perspectives, they challenge viewers and listeners to critically analyze the information presented and form their own opinions. Their commitment to creating thought-provoking content that sparks meaningful conversations is evident in their previous works and remains a driving force behind their current project.
Documentaries have long been a powerful tool for conveying important messages and inciting change. Ann McElhinney and Phelim McAleer have harnessed this medium to bring attention to issues often overlooked or misunderstood. Through their inventive approach, they have transformed the trial between Michael Mann, Mark Steyn, and Rand Simberg into a national sensation, capturing the interest of individuals across the political spectrum.
As the trial continues, McElhinney and McAleer’s podcast serves as a valuable resource for those unable to attend the court proceedings. By bringing the arguments to life and making them accessible to a wider audience, they ensure that the important discussions taking place in the D.C. Superior Court reach beyond the confines of the courtroom.
In an era inundated with biased news sources and divisive rhetoric, the work of documentary filmmakers like McElhinney and McAleer is invaluable. They provide audiences with an opportunity to engage with complex issues, challenge preconceived notions, and ultimately form their own educated opinions. By tackling controversial subjects and presenting them in an engaging and accessible manner, they serve as catalysts for informed public discourse.
Through their consistent dedication to telling stories that matter, Ann McElhinney and Phelim McAleer have solidified themselves as influential and compelling documentarians. Their latest project, “Climate Change on Trial,” is yet another testament to their ability to captivate audiences and spark meaningful conversations. As the trial unfolds, their podcast promises to provide a unique perspective on a heated debate, encouraging listeners to think critically about the arguments presented and to engage in constructive dialogue.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
