oann

Google’s chatbot avoids discussing Israel.


OAN’s Stella Escobedo
4:16 ⁤PM – Friday, October 27, 2023

Pro-Hamas, anti-Israel propaganda is spreading like wildfire online, and it’s getting some help from “big tech.” Dan Schneider, the head of Free Speech America at the Media Research Center, joins One America’s ‍Stella Escobedo to expose how Google’s Chatbot “Bard” ⁣is refusing ‍to acknowledge Israel⁣ altogether.

Share this post!

Pro-Hamas, anti-Israel propaganda is ‌spreading like wildfire online, and it’s getting some help from “big tech.”

Representative Dean Phillips announces ‌a run for president against Joe Biden in the Democrat Primary.

The Associated Press Stylebook is discouraging news organizations from calling Hamas a terror group.

Relatives of dual American-Israeli ⁤hostages push Congress to bring their loved ​ones back home.

Intel rose more than 9% on Friday⁢ and ⁤sparked a jump in chip stocks after the personal computer market was rebounding from its quarters-long slump.

Amazon.com rose 7% on Friday​ as it aims for a larger share of the ⁣booming artificial intelligence market in a⁤ race with Microsoft.

Malaysia’s communications ‌regulator will issue a warning to ​social media firms TikTok and Meta for allegedly blocking pro-Palestinian content on ⁢their platforms.

Lawyers for ​FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried kicked​ off their case at his fraud trial on Thursday.

rnrn

‍How⁣ do biased content moderation policies on social media platforms reinforce a one-sided narrative in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Ella Escobedo to discuss how social media platforms are contributing to the dissemination of this biased narrative.

In recent years, the conflict between Israel and Hamas has intensified,⁤ leading to countless casualties and displacement ⁢of innocent civilians. However, rather than providing a balanced​ view of⁣ the situation, social ⁢media platforms seem​ to be‌ amplifying one side of the story while suppressing the other.

Dan Schneider points⁤ out that these platforms, such as Facebook and Twitter, claim to be ‍neutral and unbiased spaces for the exchange of‍ ideas ‌and​ information. However, their algorithms and content moderation policies tell a different story. Schneider argues that their algorithms are designed in a way that gives more visibility to pro-Hamas content and limits the reach of pro-Israel voices.

Furthermore,‍ he highlights the biased approach of​ content moderation policies. While posts expressing support for Hamas and ‍its extremist ⁢ideologies are ​allowed to ‍flourish, those advocating for Israel and ⁣calling for peace‍ are often ⁢censored or labeled‍ as hate speech. It is deeply concerning that these platforms are indirectly endorsing and promoting a terrorist organization’s narrative while silencing those who ‌seek peaceful resolutions.

Schneider also underlines the power dynamics at play in this issue. The “big tech” companies control the flow of⁤ information and can influence ⁤public opinion on a global scale. As⁢ such, their responsibility to maintain a fair and balanced discourse ⁤becomes ever more critical. Unfortunately, it seems that they have succumbed to ⁣pressure from certain interest groups and are prioritizing one side of the⁤ conflict over the other.

The consequences of this‍ biased narrative are far-reaching. It not only perpetuates the cycle of violence and hatred but also hinders the possibilities for peaceful negotiations and understanding between the two parties. By censoring‌ pro-Israel voices, social media platforms are effectively shutting down‍ any opportunity for dialogue and the exchange of different perspectives.

It⁣ is crucial⁢ for social media platforms ⁢to recognize their role as facilitators of free speech and open discourse. They must take steps to ensure that their algorithms and content moderation policies are fair and ‍impartial, giving equal visibility​ and‍ support to all voices involved in the Israeli-Palestinian ‌conflict. Failure to ⁤do so perpetuates the polarization and contributes to the spread ⁣of misinformation and propaganda.

Additionally, individuals​ must also ​take it upon ‍themselves to seek out‍ diverse sources of information and engage critically with the content they consume. By actively challenging biased narratives and sharing alternative perspectives, we can collectively counteract the one-sided narrative that currently dominates social media platforms.

In conclusion, the⁢ pro-Hamas, anti-Israel propaganda that is spreading on social media platforms is a concerning phenomenon. It‌ not only undermines the principles of free speech and open debate but also exacerbates the conflict between Israel and​ Hamas. It is high time that social media​ platforms and their users actively‍ work towards promoting fair and ⁢balanced narratives, fostering understanding,‍ and advocating for peaceful resolutions.


Read More From Original Article Here: Google’s Chatbot Refuses To Talk About Israel

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker