German president says US basis for Iran war ‘does not hold water’
Deprecated: str_getcsv(): the $escape parameter must be provided as its default value will change in /var/www/html/breaking-news/wp-content/plugins/wp-auto-affiliate-links/aal_engine.php on line 361
German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier challenged the United States’ justification for its war with Iran, saying the claim of an imminent threat “does not hold water” adn that the conflict violates international law. He argued in Germany that the push for preemptive action, tied to Iran’s alleged nuclear ambitions, fails to meet legal standards and that the war is avoidable and inconsistent with norms governing the use of force. Steinmeier’s remarks reflect growing European unease with the U.S.-backed campaign, wich has involved strikes with Israel and drew skepticism from some officials in Washington, including resignations like that of Joe Kent. He linked the conflict to the broader collapse of diplomatic efforts, noting that abandoning the 2015 Iran nuclear deal contributed to the crisis and calling the war a politically disastrous mistake. The episode highlights ongoing tensions over whether the justification for the war meets self-defense criteria and the potential for wider regional and economic consequences.
German president says US justification for Iran war ‘does not hold water’
German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier said Tuesday that the U.S.’s justification for its war with Iran “does not hold water,” delivering a sharp rebuke of Washington’s rationale as questions mount about the conflict’s validity.
Speaking in Germany, Steinmeier said the United States argument that Iran posed an imminent threat because of its venture toward a nuclear weapon failed to meet the standard required under international law, calling the war avoidable and inconsistent with legal norms governing the use of force.
“There is little doubt that, in any case, the justification of an imminent attack on the U.S. does not hold water,” Steinmeier said, after affirming that “this war violates international law.”
The comments reflect growing European unease with the U.S.-backed campaign, which began joint strikes with Israel on Iranian leadership and defense infrastructure. Critics in Europe have increasingly questioned whether the conflict meets the legal threshold for self-defense, particularly in the absence of publicly presented evidence of an imminent Iranian attack.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the imminent threat was an Iranian counterattack that would follow an Israeli attack that the U.S. knew was coming, while House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) reiterated that the administration believed Tehran presented an imminent threat to U.S. interests and allies with its alleged pursuit of a nuclear weapon. Those claims have been central to the administration’s legal and political defense of the war.
However, skepticism has also emerged within the Trump administration. Joe Kent, director of President Donald Trump‘s National Counterterrorism Center, became the first known official to resign over the war, citing concerns about its justification and direction.
The war has triggered a broader debate over the collapse of diplomatic efforts that once constrained Iran’s nuclear program. Steinmeier, who played a role in negotiating the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, suggested that abandoning the agreement in favor of military action contributed to the conflict.
“This war is also — and please bear with me when I say this, as someone directly involved — a politically disastrous mistake,” Steinmeier said. “And that’s what frustrates me the most. A truly avoidable, unnecessary war, if its goal was to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.”
Trump’s continued threats to strike Iran’s energy infrastructure have also drawn criticism, with some opponents arguing such attacks would be war crimes and risk wider regional escalation.
EUROPEAN LEADERS UNITED IN OPPOSING US EASING SANCTIONS ON RUSSIAN OIL
Steinmeier’s office is largely symbolic, as Chancellor Friedrich Merz is primarily responsible for running the government, but his public opposition could fuel debate in Germany over the war in Iran.
Merz was initially in favor of the war, having shared the U.S. goal of regime change in Iran, but the spreading economic tolls due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz have prompted the chancellor to be more critical.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
