Progressive New Mexico transitions from legalizing marijuana to providing taxpayer-funded subsidies for cannabis
Taxpayers Subsidizing New Mexico’s Cannabis Industry
Legal recreational marijuana was expected to bring in profits for New Mexico, but now taxpayers are footing the bill. The New Mexico Economic Development Department has allocated $90,000 from the Local Economic Development Act job-creation fund to Vana LLC, a cannabis manufacturing business.
“The company has constructed a cutting-edge growing and manufacturing facility, engaging local contractors and subcontractors,” a release stated. “It also sources locally grown cannabis products to process for area farmers, creating an affordable avenue for farmers and micro-producers to manufacture and sell their products and fostering a sustainable local business ecosystem. Vana benefits from a partnership with sister companies Orenda Farms and Vana Society, allowing it to grow, manufacture, and distribute boutique products.”
This marks the first LEDA grant awarded to a cannabis business in New Mexico. However, the EDD has previously provided funding to other cannabis and hemp entities through programs like the Job Training Incentive Program.
Vana plans to hire 12 new employees with average salaries of $46,626 per year and invest $2.6 million in the state over the next decade. The company obtained the state’s first approved cannabis manufacturing license two years ago and is licensed for indoor and outdoor farms, a manufacturing facility, and two retail locations serving both medical and recreational markets.
The company expects to eventually employ 45 to 50 New Mexicans.
“EDD’s investment in Clovis-based Vana LLC is a testament to the success of Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham’s forward-thinking economic policies,” said Acting EDD Secretary Mark Roper. “The legalization of recreational cannabis in New Mexico is growing businesses and helping rural communities diversify their economy and add jobs.”
Vana estimates that it will contribute approximately $350,000 in gross receipts tax to the City of Clovis each year.
“We have roots in this community, and we want to give back to the community where we raised our family,” said Vana CEO and founder Parin Kumar. “This investment is a big commitment for us, and the state assistance is important to build partnerships so we can achieve long-term success as we add employees and grow.”
According to the Department of Workforce Solutions, the cannabis industry employed 2,022 people in New Mexico at the end of 2022, with 88% of those employed working at marijuana dispensaries.
What are the concerns raised by opponents regarding the necessity and fairness of subsidizing an already profitable industry?
Ts.”
This move by the New Mexico Economic Development Department has sparked controversy among taxpayers. Many argue that subsidizing the cannabis industry with taxpayer money is unjust and inappropriate. They question why a profitable industry like marijuana needs financial assistance from the public.
Supporters of the subsidy argue that it will create jobs and boost the local economy. By investing in cannabis manufacturing businesses like Vana LLC, they believe that New Mexico can become a leader in the cannabis industry and attract more businesses and tourists. They argue that the long-term benefits will outweigh the initial costs.
However, opponents argue that subsidizing an industry that is already generating significant revenue is unnecessary and unfair. They highlight that the cannabis industry is thriving in New Mexico, with millions of dollars in tax revenue being generated. Instead of using taxpayer money, they believe that the government should focus on funding areas that truly need financial assistance, such as education and healthcare.
Additionally, critics question the fairness of providing financial support to only a select few businesses in the cannabis industry. They argue that this preferential treatment undermines fair competition and hinders the growth of other businesses in the state.
Another concern raised by taxpayers is the potential misuse of taxpayer funds. They worry that the allocated money may not be used efficiently or may be mishandled by the recipients. They call for transparency and accountability in the distribution and use of taxpayer subsidies.
Furthermore, opponents of the subsidy argue that it sets a problematic precedent. If the government continues to allocate taxpayer money to the cannabis industry, it may encourage other industries to seek similar financial assistance. This could lead to a situation where taxpayers are subsidizing various industries, ultimately burdening them with unnecessary financial responsibilities.
In conclusion, the allocation of taxpayer funds to subsidize New Mexico’s cannabis industry has ignited a debate among the public. Supporters argue that the subsidy will boost the local economy and create jobs, positioning the state as a leader in the cannabis industry. However, opponents question the necessity and fairness of subsidizing an already profitable industry, suggesting that taxpayer money should be directed towards areas in need such as education and healthcare. Transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of taxpayer funds are also concerns raised. The outcome of this debate will shape the future relationship between taxpayers and the cannabis industry in New Mexico.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
