Florida Grand Jury Report Validates 5 Censored Covid Claims
Florida Grand Jury Releases Interim Report on Covid Vaccine Manufacturers
After months of investigation, a Florida grand jury has released its first interim report on potential “wrongdoing” by Covid vaccine manufacturers and entities involved in promoting the shots. This investigation, requested by Governor Ron DeSantis and authorized by the Florida Supreme Court, aims to determine if pharmaceutical manufacturers and medical associations engaged in criminal activity or wrongdoing related to the development, approval, or marketing of Covid-19 vaccines.
The grand jury, officially sworn in on June 26, 2023, has faced challenges in obtaining cooperation from federal agencies such as the CDC, FDA, and even the U.S. Army. Despite these obstacles, the interim report sheds light on various aspects of America’s Covid response.
1. Inflated Covid Hospitalization Numbers
The grand jury suggests that Covid hospitalization numbers were likely inflated due to financial incentives provided by the CARES Act. The act created subsidies for Medicare and Medicaid patients with Covid-19, leading to a potential overreporting of hospitalizations.
2. Minimal Impact of Covid on Children
The report confirms that Covid-19 poses minimal harm to children and most adults. Despite this knowledge, public health officials and politicians ignored the evidence and kept children out of school for extended periods, negatively impacting their education.
3. Ignored Preexisting Research
Public health officials disregarded previous research on nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPI) like lockdowns and masking. Those who questioned the validity of these policies were attacked by the media and figures in authority.
4. Harmful Effects of Lockdowns
The grand jury found that long-term isolation through lockdowns was not sustainable and resulted in excess mortality, particularly among low-risk groups. Jurisdictions that targeted protective efforts towards high-risk groups fared better than those implementing widespread and extended quarantine measures.
5. Ineffectiveness of Masks
Despite the continued insistence on wearing face masks, the grand jury states that there is no sound evidence of their effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Mask mandates did not make a significant difference in areas compared to those without mandates.
3) What actions should be taken to address the dissemination of misleading information about the Covid-19 vaccines, and how can medical associations and professional bodies ensure accurate communication of benefits and risks to the public
L activities or deceptive practices throughout the development, production, and distribution process of the Covid-19 vaccines.
The grand jury, comprised of citizens from various backgrounds, was tasked with thoroughly examining the actions of vaccine manufacturers and associated entities. Their interim report, released last week, sheds light on the initial findings of the ongoing investigation.
Accordingly, the report highlights several key areas of concern. Firstly, the grand jury scrutinizes the process of vaccine development, questioning whether research protocols were followed diligently and potential risks were adequately assessed. The report emphasizes the necessity of ensuring transparency and full disclosure of clinical trial data, including any adverse effects observed during the studies.
Furthermore, the report delves into the production phase, specifically addressing potential fraudulent practices in relation to vaccine manufacturing. It explores allegations of unsafe manufacturing standards, inadequate quality control measures, and questionable distribution channels. The grand jury emphasizes the importance of safeguarding the public’s trust and calls for strict oversight and regulation of vaccine production to protect the health and well-being of individuals receiving the shots.
In addition to investigating manufacturers, the grand jury also identifies medical associations and related entities as potential subjects of wrongdoing. The interim report highlights concerns regarding the promotion and dissemination of misleading information to the public. It questions whether healthcare organizations and professional bodies accurately conveyed the benefits and risks associated with the Covid-19 vaccines. The grand jury underscores the importance of maintaining the integrity of medical guidance provided to the public, emphasizing that any misleading or inaccurate information may undermine vaccine confidence.
The release of this interim report has generated significant public interest and sparked debates about vaccine safety and accountability. Critics argue that vaccine manufacturers and associated entities have a moral and legal obligation to prioritize public health over profit-making motives. They assert that any evidence of negligence, fraud, or deception should be thoroughly investigated and addressed to restore public trust in the vaccines. Advocates for the vaccine industry, on the other hand, emphasize the rigorous regulatory processes in place and the millions of lives saved by the vaccines.
While the interim report does not provide conclusive evidence of criminal activities or deceptive practices, it serves as a crucial step in ensuring the accountability and transparency of the Covid-19 vaccine manufacturers. The grand jury’s comprehensive investigation aims to shed light on any potential wrongdoing and ultimately protect the welfare of the population.
As the investigation continues, it is imperative that all involved parties cooperate fully and transparently. The public has a right to know the truth about the vaccine development and production process to make informed decisions regarding their health. Authorities must ensure that any necessary reforms and regulatory measures are implemented swiftly to prevent any potential recurrence of the issues highlighted in the interim report.
Ultimately, the work of the grand jury signifies the importance of robust oversight and accountability in the pharmaceutical industry. The findings of this investigation will not only shape the future of Covid-19 vaccines but also set a precedent for the development, production, and distribution of vaccines in addressing public health emergencies. The public’s trust in vaccines is paramount in mitigating the impact of the ongoing pandemic and future healthcare crises.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
