Fixing Government Waste Starts With Giving Power Back To States
Deprecated: str_getcsv(): the $escape parameter must be provided as its default value will change in /var/www/html/breaking-news/wp-content/plugins/wp-auto-affiliate-links/aal_engine.php on line 361
The piece, authored by former Senator Jim DeMint, argues that the United States should return power to states and individuals and apply lessons from total quality management (TQM) to government. It recounts how the U.S.rose as a manufacturing leader after World War II, but notes that American firms later suffered from bloated management, rising costs, shrinking profits, and declining quality as Japan adopted TQM-an approach developed by American consultants Edward Deming and Joseph Juran. DeMint shares his experience applying TQM in the 1980s, including as a certified quality trainer, and emphasizes root-cause analysis and pushing decision-making down to those who produce goods and deliver services. He draws a parallel between quality improvement in manufacturing and better policymaking in government, arguing that the Founding Fathers designed a system with dispersed power to prevent corruption and ensure accountability.
According to the article, the Constitution created a flat structure with three branches at the federal level and left most authority to the states and the people; though, current practice concentrates power at the federal level across areas like education, health care, retirement, energy, workplace safety, and the environment. This centralization, DeMint contends, leads to waste, fraud, corruption, high costs, inefficiency, debt, division, and political paralysis. He contends that Democrats oppose decentralization because centralized power benefits their political leverage, while he urges voters to ask why and for Republicans to offer clearer, more effective solutions.The piece is part of a series by DeMint, with references to his broader investigations into how American governance could better reflect the quality-focused principles he championed.
Editor’s note: This is the fourth in a series of articles written by former Sen. Jim DeMint. Read the introduction here and the first three articles here, here, and here.
The United States became the world’s leading manufacturer and exporter after World War II. Over the decades that followed, major manufacturing companies in America became top-heavy in their management, costs increased, profits shrank, and the quality of their products declined. By the late 1970’s, Japan, a nation long-known for cheap, low-quality products, began producing low-cost, high-quality automobiles and many other products that were superior to those manufactured in America. Japan’s secret became known as total quality management (TQM). It was the brainchild of American consultants Edward Deming and Joseph Juran — experts who had been ignored by arrogant manufacturing executives in the United States.
I added TQM consulting to my practice in the 1980s and learned a lot about how it could revolutionize any company, including service companies like hospitals and universities. The concept of TQM was relatively simple, but hard for old-style executives to accept, because it required giving up control and pushing decision-making down to the people who were producing the products and providing the services. Giving up control is very difficult for executives — and politicians.
I was a certified quality trainer, and my job was to teach workers how to continuously improve quality and not accept anything less than 100 percent of the desired quality goal. One of the keys to making this work was to identify problems, defects, or inefficiencies, and then keep digging and asking “why” until you discovered the root cause of the problem. Understanding the connection between cause and effect was difficult for many workers, because our lifestyles, education system, and expectations have virtually eliminated critical thinking skills. Most people focus on the problem or the symptom of the problem and don’t naturally seek the root cause. This inability to connect cause and effect is evident with American voters.
You might be asking how this discussion of quality improvement in manufacturing relates to creating better policies in government. Well, after working in the private sector and then in government, I can assure you that the lessons learned from the quality renaissance of American manufacturing are exactly what must happen to fix our government. Remarkably, our Founding Fathers and authors of our Constitution seemed to understand the principles of TQM completely, especially one of the core principles: Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
The American Constitution created a flat organizational structure with power and decision-making pushed to the lowest level — the people. The “management hierarchy” at the federal level was divided into three control centers (branches of government) that were intended to balance and limit the power of the other branches — the executive, legislative, and judicial.
In addition to dividing powers at the federal level, the Constitution left most of the decision-making to the states and individual citizens. The writers of our Constitution would be astonished to know that today the federal government controls or regulates education, health care, retirement plans, energy production, workplace safety, environmental issues, and some part of practically every business in America. Our founders intended for the federal government to have limited and divided powers, while most governmental powers would be dispersed among the states and the people. Instead, government power is now concentrated at the federal level.
As predicted, the concentration of power at the federal level has led to waste, fraud, corruption, poor quality and high-cost services, inefficiency, debt, division, and political paralysis. Yet federal politicians, specifically politicians in the Democrat Party, are totally opposed to giving power back to the states and the people. Even though the statistics confirm that the federal government is incapable of providing services efficiently, cost-effectively, and without high levels of waste and fraud, Democrats obstruct efforts to move decision-making to the states and the people. The reason for this obstruction is obvious: Democrats benefit politically by controlling money and services and using this leverage to manipulate voters on a national scale.
Except for national defense, trade, immigration, and border control, there are very few issues that states, private businesses and organizations, or individual Americans could not handle better. The fact that Democrats will not even consider decentralizing power on any issue should tell you everything you need to know. Voters need to wake up and start asking “why.” And Republicans need to be ready with better answers.
Jim DeMint is a former Senator from South Carolina and best-selling author. His latest book is What the Bible Really Says about Creation, End Times, Politics and You.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."



