the federalist

Fani Willis’ legal team discussed the ‘Get Trump’ case with Biden White House, funded by taxpayers

Evidence submitted in a motion by former Trump campaign official ⁤Michael Roman’s legal team suggests Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis used taxpayer​ money to meet with the Biden⁣ White House about her 2020 election case ⁣against Donald Trump around the time he ⁢announced ⁢his 2024 presidential​ campaign.

Corporate media hubbub about the recent filing largely centered on Willis’⁣ allegedly inappropriate romantic relationship with private attorney Nathan Wade, who she contracted out as a special prosecutor on⁣ her “get Trump” case.

Documents allege Wade, who the motion alleges was underqualified for the role, used some⁣ of the $654,000⁤ taxpayer-funded legal fees he earned on‍ the case against former President Donald Trump to fund “lavish ⁣vacations” for him and‌ Willis.

The motion asserts that Willis and Wade’s actions amount to‍ honest services fraud and possibly federal racketeering.

Perhaps the⁣ most interesting evidence presented ‍in the motion is ​that Willis paid Wade ​with taxpayer dollars for at least two formal meetings they had with the Biden White House about their⁤ prosecution of Biden’s number one political opponent.

Tucked away in one of the exhibits attached ⁣to ​the motion to‍ dismiss and ⁤qualify were several invoices from the law offices of Nathan J. Wade. Among the charges for prep meetings and discovery dating back to 2021 were two bills for 8-hour conferences with the‌ Biden⁤ White House.

The first $2,000 meeting happened in presumably Athens, Georgia, in May 2022.

The second $2,000 conference was held in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 18, 2022. Trump had just announced his 2024 candidacy three ​days earlier.

By the time her crew officially met with ⁣Biden’s legal team in 2022, Willis was⁣ already more than a year ‍into her politically charged persecution of Trump.

Willis is an election integrity denier who ​hinged ‌her prosecution of the‍ former president on the fake‌ news ⁢that Trump asked the Georgia secretary ⁣of state to⁢ find him 11,780 votes.

Willis technically possesses ‌evidence ‌ that exonerates Georgia’s alternate electors, but that hasn’t​ stopped her from pursuing weak criminal charges against Trump and several of his allies for questioning election inconsistencies‌ that surfaced in 2020.

The​ contact between her legal team and ⁤the White House during key developmental stages of her case⁤ against Trump only seems⁣ to confirm that Democrats’‌ lawfare is designed to hamper the Republican’s 2024 election chances.


Jordan Boyd is a staff writer ⁣at The Federalist and co-producer of The Federalist Radio ⁢Hour. Her work has also been featured​ in The Daily Wire, Fox ⁤News, ⁢and RealClearPolitics. Jordan ‍graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow her on Twitter @jordanboydtx.

Popular

What potential criminal charges are implied ‍by the motion, and what is⁤ the most intriguing evidence ⁤presented regarding Willis and Wade’s meetings with the Biden White House

Evidence presented‌ in a recent‌ motion by⁤ former Trump campaign official Michael Roman’s legal team has raised concerns about ⁤the alleged misuse of taxpayer money by Fulton‌ County District Attorney⁤ Fani Willis. According to the ⁣motion, Willis used taxpayer funds to meet with the Biden White House regarding her 2020​ election case against Donald Trump, which coincided with the announcement of Trump’s 2024 presidential⁣ campaign.

Much of the media coverage surrounding this filing has focused on allegations of an inappropriate romantic relationship​ between Willis and private​ attorney Nathan Wade.‍ Wade was contracted as a ​special prosecutor on Willis’ case against Trump. The motion claims that Wade, who was deemed inadequate for the role, used a⁣ portion of the $654,000 in taxpayer-funded legal⁤ fees he earned on the case to finance lavish vacations for himself and Willis.

The motion further suggests that⁣ the actions of Willis and Wade amount to honest services fraud and potentially‍ federal⁢ racketeering. However, the most intriguing evidence presented in the ‌motion is the​ claim that Willis paid‍ Wade with taxpayer dollars for at‌ least two meetings with the Biden White House regarding their prosecution of Biden’s top political opponent.

Hidden among the exhibits attached to the motion were invoices⁤ from the​ law ⁤offices of Nathan J. Wade, ⁣detailing charges for preparatory meetings and discovery dating back to 2021. Significantly, two bills included charges for 8-hour conferences with the ‌Biden White House. The first meeting, costing $2,000, took place in Athens, Georgia, in May 2022. The second conference, also costing $2,000, occurred in Washington, D.C.⁣ on November 18,⁤ 2022, just three days after Trump announced his ⁣candidacy for the​ 2024 ⁤election.

It is worth noting that by the time ‌Willis and her team met with Biden’s legal team ⁤in 2022,​ she had already been involved in her politically charged persecution of Trump for over a year.

This ‌motion provides troubling​ allegations of⁤ potential misconduct by​ the Fulton ⁣County District Attorney and her contractor. If substantiated, these claims would raise serious questions about the⁣ integrity and impartiality of the legal proceedings against Donald Trump. The use of taxpayer money to fund personal vacations and meetings with the⁣ Biden White House further calls into⁣ question the ethical practices ‌of those involved.

As this case continues to unfold, it‌ is crucial ⁣that a thorough investigation takes place to‌ determine the veracity ‍of these ⁤allegations. The justice system should always uphold the highest standards of transparency, fairness, and‌ integrity to ensure that the rights of all individuals, regardless of their political ⁤affiliations, are ⁢protected. So far, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and private attorney Nathan ⁣Wade have not publicly responded to these allegations.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker