Concerns arise over SCOTUS’s silence regarding college free speech case
Free Speech on Campus: A Legal Limbo
The Supreme Court’s recent decision—or lack thereof—has sparked a renewed fervor in the contentious debate over free speech in academia. At the heart of the dispute, a lawsuit against Virginia Tech’s policies has questioned the balance between campus harmony and the First Amendment.
The Catalyst: Speech First, Inc. v. Sands
The wrangle intensified with the challenge brought by Speech First, Inc. against Virginia Tech’s bias-response team policies. These policies, which scrutinized student speech deemed “problematic,” had raised alarms about potential encroachments on free expression when disciplinary actions were recommended.
According to Speech First, these regulations infringed on students’ constitutional rights, particularly targeting those diverging from the pervasive liberal views on campus.
Supreme Court Decision: A Moot Question?
The case reached an anticlimactic conclusion as the Supreme Court deemed it moot because Virginia Tech had already revised the contentious policy. While the Court erased a prior ruling favoring the school, this outcome signals a larger conflict brewing across the nation’s educational institutions.
Experts Weigh In on the Free Speech Conundrum
“Federal courts have recognized that bias response teams can suppress free speech,” shared Jonathan Butcher from the Heritage Foundation. “DEI offices’ affiliation with these teams further illustrates the level of discrimination and censorship that exists within academia.”
Butcher stressed the battle is far from over, predicting similar cases will challenge the High Court in the future. His observations suggest that some colleges are retreating from such policies, sensing constitutional infringement.
Justices Express Concern
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito were vocal about the missed opportunity, stressing the case’s importance in establishing uniform First Amendment protections across U.S. college campuses.
“… Until we resolve it, there will be a patchwork of First Amendment rights on college campuses: Students in some areas may challenge university policies, while others have no recourse…” the dissenting opinion stated.
Critics of Bias Response Teams Speak Out
Opponents, like Teresa Manning of the National Association of Scholars, denounce bias response teams as antithetical to the mission of higher education, which is meant to foster informed discourse and broad perspectives.
“The college campus should be a bastion of academic inquiry and vibrant debate,” Manning argued, condemning the oversight approach as akin to “police state tactics” suppressing intellectual diversity.
The Funding Factor
Attention also turns to financial aspects, as many speech-regulating institutions receive substantial taxpayer funds. Manning’s stance is unequivocal: no public money should support universities that engage in activities she deems un-American and unconstitutional.
“Pull the plug on them,” she urged, hinting at a future where fiscal leverage might influence institutional policies on free speech. The Supreme Court’s inaction represents a temporary sidestep in a dilemma that can’t be ignored indefinitely.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
