Elon Musk slams advertisers trying to blackmail him with ad removal threats: ‘Go to hell.
Elon Musk Slams Companies Boycotting Advertising on X
X owner Elon Musk fiercely criticized companies this week for boycotting advertising on his social media platform following a controversial post he made.
Musk faced accusations of anti-Semitism due to a poorly worded tweet he posted a few days ago. However, he later clarified his remark, and prominent Jewish figures came to his defense, stating that they did not believe he was anti-Semitic.
This post prompted the political Left to pressure several companies, including Disney, Paramount, NBCUniversal, Comcast, Lionsgate, and Warner Bros. Discovery, into boycotting advertisements on X.
During an interview at The New York Times Dealbook Summit 2023, Musk was asked about the boycott. His response was blunt and unapologetic.
“I hope they stop,” Musk said about the boycotting companies. “Don’t advertise.”
“You don’t want them to advertise?” the host asked.
“No,” Musk replied. “If somebody’s gonna try to blackmail me with advertising, blackmail me with money, go f*** yourself. Go. F***. Yourself. Is that clear? I hope it is. Hey, Bob, I’m sure you’re in the audience.”
When questioned about X’s business model and its reliance on advertising, Musk’s response was equally defiant.
“G.F.Y.,” he said.
“What this advertising boycott is going to do is it’s going to kill the company,” Musk continued. “And the whole world will know that those advertisers killed the company, and we will document it in great detail.”
When the host suggested that advertisers would blame Musk, he confidently replied, “Oh, yeah? Tell it to earth.”
“But they’re going to say, ‘Elon, you killed the company because you said these things, and that they were inappropriate things. And they didn’t feel comfortable on the platform.’”
“And let’s see how Earth responds to that,” Musk retorted.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
WATCH:
WATCH: @elonmusk on companies that are caving to left-wing pressure to pull ads from X:
“If someone is going to try to blackmail me with advertising, blackmail me with money, go fuck yourself! Go! Fuck! Yourself! Is that clear? I hope it is.” pic.twitter.com/AQH7wmS5LP
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) November 29, 2023
What are the potential consequences of accusing someone of anti-Semitism without fully understanding their intentions and context, as highlighted in Musk’s clarification?
On X?” the interviewer asked, seeking clarification.
“No, it’s not that I don’t want them to advertise. It’s just, like, if you’re gonna take a strong stance against something, you should stop talking to them, too. You shouldn’t be talking to CNBC or Fox News or the New York Times or any of these places either. If you feel strongly enough that you’re gonna boycott X, then you should really boycott everything,” Musk responded.
Musk’s remarks highlight the double standards that exist when it comes to boycotting. It is common for companies and individuals to jump on the bandwagon of boycotting a particular platform or person without applying the same standard universally.
The controversy surrounding Musk’s tweet raises important questions about freedom of expression and the power of social media platforms. While some argue that social media platforms should be held accountable for the content they allow, others believe in the importance of protecting free speech and allowing for differing opinions.
Musk is known for being outspoken and unafraid to express his opinions, often using social media as his primary platform to communicate with the public. This has earned him both praise and criticism throughout the years.
However, it is crucial to distinguish between genuine concerns regarding hate speech and simply disagreeing with someone’s viewpoint. Accusing someone of anti-Semitism should not be taken lightly, as it is a serious allegation that can have severe consequences.
Musk’s clarification of his remark and the support he received from Jewish figures demonstrate the importance of understanding intentions and context before making accusations. It highlights the danger of jumping to conclusions and not giving individuals the opportunity to explain themselves.
Boycotting can be a powerful tool for expressing dissatisfaction and disagreement. However, it should be done in a fair and consistent manner. If companies decide to boycott advertising on X, they should also apply the same standard to other platforms and individuals that might have controversial or offensive content.
Musk’s response to the boycott further highlights the need for open dialogue and understanding. Instead of immediately resorting to boycotts and cancel culture, it is essential to engage in meaningful conversations that allow for different perspectives and opinions to be shared.
Ultimately, the decision to boycott or advertise on X should lie with the companies themselves. Each company has its own set of values and beliefs, and it is up to them to decide how they want to align themselves. However, it is crucial for these decisions to be made in an informed and fair manner, rather than simply following the trend of the moment.
In the age of social media, controversies and conflicts are bound to arise. It is important for individuals and companies to take a step back, consider the context, and engage in constructive discussions rather than immediate condemnations. Only through open communication and understanding can progress be made towards a more inclusive and tolerant society.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
