Elise Stefanik’s VP case: I wouldn’t have done what Pence did
Rep. Elise Stefanik Asserts Loyalty to Trump, Questions Pence’s Decision on Election Certification
Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), a potential running mate for former President Donald Trump in 2024, made a bold statement on Thursday, solidifying her loyalty to Trump by claiming she would not have certified the 2020 election results if she were vice president on Jan. 6, 2021.
During an interview on CNN, Stefanik expressed her disagreement with former Vice President Mike Pence’s approach to certifying the election results, stating, “I would not have done what Mike Pence did. I don’t think that was the right approach. I specifically stand by what I said on the House floor.”
Standing Against “Unconstitutional Overreach”
Stefanik, who voted against certifying the results of the 2020 election, argued that there was “unconstitutional overreach” in states like Pennsylvania. However, she did vote to certify the results in Arizona.
Emphasizing the importance of upholding the Constitution and ensuring secure elections, Stefanik stated, “I think it’s very important that we continue to stand up for the Constitution and have legal and secure elections, which we did not have in 2020.”
While Pence has defended his decision to certify the election results, even in the face of the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill riot, Stefanik’s remarks highlight the pressure Trump allegedly exerted on Pence to disregard certain states’ results. This move would have potentially overturned the election outcome in favor of President Joe Biden.
According to Pence, certifying the results was his constitutional duty. In an interview with ABC News, he stated, “I know by God’s grace, we did our duty that day, to act out the express language of the Constitution of the United States.”
Aside from Stefanik, other potential contenders for Trump’s vice presidential pick include Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) and Gov. Kristi Noem (R-SD).
Click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.
How does Lise Stefanik’s unwavering loyalty to former President Donald Trump impact the state of American democracy?
Lise Stefanik of New York has emerged as a prominent voice within the Republican Party, asserting her unwavering loyalty to former President Donald Trump and openly questioning Vice President Mike Pence’s decision regarding the certification of the 2020 election results. Stefanik’s stance highlights the ongoing divisions within the GOP and raises concerns about the state of American democracy.
Stefanik, a staunch Trump supporter, rose to national prominence during the first impeachment inquiry against the former president. Her unwavering defense of Trump in the face of impeachment earned her widespread recognition and the admiration of many within the Republican Party. Since then, Stefanik has positioned herself as a leading figure within the GOP, endorsing Trump’s false claims of widespread election fraud and vocally challenging the legitimacy of President Joe Biden’s victory.
In recent weeks, Stefanik has taken her allegiance to Trump to new heights by openly criticizing Pence’s role in certifying the 2020 election results. On January 6, 2021, as Congress convened to certify Biden’s victory, a group of pro-Trump protesters stormed the Capitol, resulting in chaos and violence. During this unsettling event, Pence, as the presiding officer, found himself in a precarious position. He had the responsibility to uphold the Constitution and certify the election results, but Trump, and some of his followers, harbored hopes that Pence would overturn the results in their favor.
Despite immense pressure from Trump and his supporters, Pence adhered to his constitutional duty and refused to overturn the election results. His decision to certify the results, despite lacking any evidence of widespread fraud, demonstrated his commitment to upholding the principles of democracy and the rule of law. However, Stefanik questioned Pence’s loyalty to Trump, asserting that he should have taken a different course of action.
Stefanik’s assertions raise concerns about the state of American democracy and the integrity of the electoral process. By questioning the legitimacy of the election results and challenging the actions of a vice president who faithfully executed his duties, she undermines the very foundations of democracy. As elected officials, it is essential that they respect the rule of law and accept the will of the American people, regardless of personal political preferences.
Moreover, Stefanik’s unfounded claims of widespread election fraud contribute to the dangerous conspiracy theories that continue to plague American society. The inability to accept the democratic process fosters a climate of distrust and division among the American people. It is crucial for leaders like Stefanik to promote unity, encourage critical thinking, and discourage the spread of baseless claims that undermine the credibility of the electoral system.
Furthermore, Stefanik’s unwavering support for Trump highlights the deep divisions within the Republican Party. While some members have distanced themselves from the former president since the Capitol insurrection, Stefanik has remained steadfast in her loyalty. This unequivocal support for Trump, despite his role in inciting the events of January 6, raises questions about the future direction of the party and its commitment to democratic values.
In conclusion, Rep. Elise Stefanik’s assertions of loyalty to Trump and her questioning of Vice President Pence’s decision regarding the certification of the 2020 election results are concerning for the state of American democracy. By undermining the foundations of democracy, promoting baseless claims of election fraud, and fostering division within her own party, Stefanik’s actions contribute to the erosion of trust in the electoral process and the fabric of American democracy. As elected officials, it is crucial that leaders like Stefanik prioritize the principles of democracy and work towards unifying the nation rather than perpetuating divisions.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
