Dems’ Quiet Move Means Taxpayers Likely to Pay Letitia James’ Legal Expenses Amid Criminal Probe: Report

A recent report indicates that New York Attorney General Letitia James may have her legal defense funded by New York state taxpayers if she faces criminal charges arising from an investigation into her real estate and mortgage dealings. The Albany Times-Union reported that the FBI is investigating James for allegedly falsely claiming a Virginia property as her primary residence while in office. Leaked facts revealed that the state’s Democrat-controlled budget includes a $10 million legal defense fund for officials facing charges connected to their actions during the Trump administration. Critics, including New York Republican State Commitee Chairman Ed Cox and Representative Elise Stefanik, have condemned the fund as an abuse of power that misuses taxpayer money to protect politically connected individuals. They argue that this initiative not only undermines public trust but also diverts attention from pressing issues facing New Yorkers. The New York Post’s editorial board echoed these sentiments, asserting that taxpayers should not bear the financial burden of legal defenses for public officials, emphasizing that if James has not committed any wrongdoing, her case should be easily dismissed.


New York state taxpayers could be on the hook for New York Attorney General Letitia James’s legal defense if the investigation against her leads to criminal charges, according to a new report.

The Albany Times-Union reported that the FBI office in Albany is leading an investigation into real estate and mortgage activities that included James claiming a Virginia home would be her primary residence while she was serving as New York’s attorney general.

Word of the investigation came shortly after leaks revealed that the state budget being approved by the Democrat-dominated state Legislature includes a $10 million legal defense fund for state officials who face charges from the Trump administration, according to the New York Post.

The bill is not specific to James. It covers state officials who “obtained representation by private counsel in response to any request, summons, command, subpoena, warrant, investigative interview or document request, audit or legally compulsive process” started by the Trump administration as a result of their work for the state.


New York Republican State Committee Chairman Ed Cox said the fund represents an “outrageous abuse of power and a slap in the face to every New Yorker.”

“This is what corruption looks like in plain sight: political insiders rigging the system to protect their own, while hardworking families get shortchanged,” he said in a statement.

“Tish James used her office to wage partisan lawfare against her political opponents, and now New Yorkers are footing the bill for the consequences,” he said.

Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York also lambasted what she called “Democrats’ Disgraceful Slush Fund” in a statement posted on her website.

“Kathy Hochul and Albany Democrats have reached a new low in their corrupt, far-left agenda by sneaking language into the state budget that misuses hardworking New Yorkers’ tax dollars to bankroll Letitia James’ legal defense against serious allegations of mortgage fraud,” Stefanik wrote.

“Letitia James, who illegally weaponized her office to pursue politically motivated witch hunts, now expects taxpayers to foot the bill for her alleged misconduct. Meanwhile, New Yorkers are crushed by skyrocketing crime, a mass exodus from our state, and a cost-of-living crisis fueled by Hochul’s failed policies. Instead of addressing these urgent issues, Albany Democrats are doubling down on shielding their corrupt allies,” she wrote.

“This shameful abuse of public funds demands accountability. I call on Governor Hochul to immediately remove this provision from the budget and for an independent investigation into James’ alleged fraud,” Stefanik wrote.

In an editorial, the New York Post editorial board said the fund was wrong on many levels.

“There is absolutely no reason for taxpayers to have to bail out James. If she didn’t do anything wrong, as she claims, then the case should be easily dismissed. And if there is a case, well, didn’t she say that no one is above the law? That doesn’t mean no one is above legal bills,” the editorial said.

“Bailing out James isn’t just offensive on its own. The bill is so broad that it would cover just about any federal investigation of anyone who cashes a state paycheck,” the Post wrote.

“James has already established a private legal defense fund to fight possible federal charges, so it’s not even clear that she needs a taxpayer bailout here,” the Post noted.

“Does James want to show New Yorkers that she really stands for them? Then she should side with taxpayers and tell lawmakers to forget about this bailout,” the editorial said.




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker