Dems Keep Trying To Offer An ‘Alternative.’ That’s Their Problem
The article discusses the ongoing struggle within the Democratic Party to present a convincing and positive option to former President Donald Trump’s agenda. Prominent Democratic strategists, including Doug Schoen, Carly Cooperman, and pollster Celinda Lake, acknowledge the party’s failure to articulate an attractive path forward. The piece critiques the democrats’ inability to offer concrete solutions on key issues such as border security, crime, energy production, foreign policy, and military priorities. It contrasts these with the Biden administration’s record, implying that the alternatives proposed during his tenure were ineffective and unpopular. The author argues that some problems have straightforward solutions and that the Democrats’ insistence on framing issues with complex alternatives risks the safety and financial well-being of Americans. Ultimately, the article suggests Democrats should focus less on crafting alternatives for policies that work and instead adopt a more pragmatic, pro-American approach.
Two recent articles have a couple quotes from prominent Democrat strategists that inadvertently capture the filthy rut the party continues to roll around in. They even use the same word.
In The Hill on Monday, campaign strategists Doug Schoen and Carly Cooperman declared that “the heart of Democrats’ dilemma is an inability to articulate their own path forward” and a failure at “communicating their own credible and attractive alternative” to President Trump’s agenda. Over in The New York Times one day before, pollster Celinda Lake almost identically said, “The biggest thing the Democrats need to do is not the negative but the positive. We have to offer an alternative.”
Sounds like a plan! So what’s the “alternative” to securing the southern border, cracking down on inner-city crime, and promoting affordable energy production? What’s the alternative to using real U.S. muscle to force a peace deal in the Middle East? What’s the alternative to insisting foreign leaders open their markets to American-made products, lest they pay penalties? (And in the meantime, they certainly are paying.) What’s the alternative to a military that prioritizes fighting capability over “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion”?
We’ve seen what the alternative to all of that looks like. It was called the Biden years. Or, if you made less than $250,000 per year, you might have more commonly known it as “Is this hell?”
Here’s an idea for Democrats though: Not everything needs an alternative. A lot of problems, maybe most of them, have one practical solution. To pretend otherwise is to play with real people’s money, their safety, and that of their families. It turns out it’s not very popular to do that.
It’s also not popular to pretend that problems aren’t problems. Recall all of 2024 when Democrat leaders, plus their very helpful friends in the dying media, swore that crime, prices, and illegal border crossings were “down.” That was a lie or, if we feel like being generous, it was misleading. Whatever you want to call it, it didn’t work for Democrats. They lost, and the party remains historically unpopular. Yes, even after calling every attempt by the president to fix those very problems “fascist.”
Democrats can keep spinning their wheels, trying to concoct an “alternative” solution to a problem that only has one. Or they could not and just be pro-American for a change.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."