Conservative News Daily

Democrats stoop lower as they rush to push through ‘terrible’ Biden nominees

Republicans Outraged as Democrats Refuse to Allow Debate on Judicial Nominations

Republican senators were‌ livid on ⁢Thursday when Democratic​ Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin ‌denied them the‍ opportunity to⁤ speak about the judicial nominations up for a ‌vote. The tension arose during the ‌committee’s consideration of two District‍ court nominations in Oregon and California, as reported⁤ by ⁤ Bloomberg Law.

When Republican Senator ⁤Marsha Blackburn of ⁤Tennessee requested ‍to discuss⁣ the two nominees, Durbin ‌dismissed​ her, stating,​ “I​ understand what you would like to do, but I’m saying that in fairness, we have debated these nominees twice,” as seen in a video posted on ⁢Twitter.

Republican Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas argued that shutting down debate was a grave‌ mistake. “There’s ‍going to be‍ a lot of consequences,” Cotton warned. “You’re gonna have a lot of consequences coming if you go down this ⁤road. I’ve cautioned a lot of you,” he emphasized.

Durbin proceeded with a roll‌ call and⁤ silenced Blackburn when​ she attempted to speak. ‍”You’re telling ⁣us to shut up? You want us ⁢to shut up?” she protested.

Republican ‍Senator‌ Lindsey ⁣Graham of South Carolina ⁣tried ⁢to reason with Durbin, ‍pointing ⁤out that many senators had not yet voiced their ​concerns about the nominees. “We want to⁢ tell you again why​ these nominees are awful,” Graham asserted.

As ⁢time passed without a ⁢response, ⁢Cotton directly addressed Durbin.​ “Is your plan to end all debate? Do you⁢ have an answer, or are you going to rely on someone whispering in your ear?” ⁣Cotton demanded.

With no reply from‌ Durbin, Blackburn persisted in ⁢her demand ⁢to ​speak, prompting Cotton to⁤ mockingly remark, “I⁣ guess Sen.​ Durbin is not going to allow women to speak either. I thought ​that was sacrosanct in your party.”

Republican Senator John Cornyn of Texas accused Durbin of damaging‍ the Senate’s institution. ‌”Mr. Chairman, you just⁢ destroyed one ​of the most important committees in the United States Senate,” Cornyn declared. “Congratulations ​on⁣ destroying the United ​States Senate Judiciary Committee,” he added, cautioning that “what goes around comes around.”

The committee then proceeded to vote⁢ on‌ the nomination of Seth‍ Aframe, an⁣ assistant U.S. ‍attorney from ​New⁣ Hampshire, for the U.S. Court of Appeals for ​the First Circuit. ⁤Graham attempted⁣ to ⁣persuade ‍Durbin to allow⁢ for further debate, highlighting that several senators‌ had not ⁤yet spoken.

Blackburn objected once again, deeming it “completely inappropriate not to ‍let ​us be heard‍ on these nominations.” She even questioned​ the legality of the vote.

A representative for Durbin⁢ defended his ​actions, stating‌ that he followed ⁤precedent and aimed for fairness in‍ the committee’s proceedings, as reported by Newsweek.


The post Democrats⁣ Sink to New Low as They‍ Attempt ⁢to Ram Through ‘Awful’ Biden Nominees appeared first on⁣ The Western Journal.

How does the refusal to allow Republicans to participate in the debate on judicial nominations impact the checks and⁣ balances that ⁤are crucial‌ to our democratic system?

‌ Ou ⁢why we think these nominees‌⁣ ‌are⁣ ⁢wrong, but you are denying⁤ us ‌that opportunity,” Graham stated. Durbin, however, stood ‍firm in his decision, arguing that Republicans ‌had ​already debated the nominees ‍extensively in the past.

This ⁢clash between Republicans and Democrats over ⁤judicial nominations is ⁤just one example⁤ of the ongoing ⁢polarization and partisan divide in the Senate. The appointment of judges ⁣to federal courts is a crucial aspect‍ of our democratic system,‌ as these judges ⁢have ⁢the power to interpret and ‌apply the law, shaping the future of our nation.

Historically, both parties‍ have engaged in heated debates over judicial nominations, with each side trying to secure the appointment of judges ⁣who ‌align with ⁣their ideologies and policy preferences. However, the refusal‌ by Democrats ‌to allow Republicans to voice their concerns and arguments against the‍ nominees goes against ⁣the principles of fairness and open dialogue.

The purpose of Senate confirmation ⁢hearings⁤ is not only to evaluate the qualifications of the nominees​ but⁤ also to provide an opportunity for senators to raise questions, express ⁢their views, and engage in a vigorous debate‌ on the nominees’ suitability. By denying Republicans the chance to speak, Democrats are ⁤effectively shutting down this important process and ‍undermining the⁣ checks ⁣and balances that are integral to​ our democratic system.

Furthermore, this decision by Durbin sets a‍ dangerous precedent where ‍one party can unilaterally silence the voices of ​the opposing​ party. In a democracy, it is crucial to have‍ a robust and diverse exchange of ideas, even if they differ from our own. By⁢ denying Republicans⁢ the opportunity to participate in the debate, Democrats ‌are stifling dissent and creating⁢ an environment where only one viewpoint is allowed.

This behavior by the​ Democrats not only undermines the credibility and integrity of the confirmation ‍process but also erodes public trust ​in our institutions. It reinforces the​ perception that politicians are more interested in pursuing‍ their own partisan agendas than upholding the principles of fairness and justice.

Republicans have every right to be outraged by this denial of their‌ right to debate. The Senate should be a forum ⁤for ​open​ and respectful discussion, where senators can present their arguments,⁢ challenge each ‍other’s perspectives, and ultimately make​ informed decisions. By shutting ⁣down debate, Democrats are not only disrespecting their Republican colleagues but also disregarding ⁣the voices of millions of Americans they represent.

It is essential that both parties remember their responsibility to​ the‌ American people and ⁣work together to ‍find common ground. The judiciary plays a vital role in upholding the rule of law and protecting our constitutional‍ rights.‌ It is imperative that judicial nominations receive the careful⁢ consideration they deserve, with ⁣the opportunity for all senators to express their opinions and concerns.

In the coming weeks and months, it remains‍ to ⁤be seen if Democrats will continue ⁣to deny⁢ Republicans the chance to debate judicial nominations. However,‌ this​ incident⁤ serves as a stark reminder ⁤of the deep political divisions that exist in our country and ​the‌ urgent need for greater unity and cooperation.

As⁤ we move forward, it⁣ is ‍my hope that both parties⁤ can ‌set aside their ‌differences and prioritize​ the ‍democratic ​principles that⁢ form the foundation of our⁣ nation. Only ​through open dialogue, respect for differing opinions, and a commitment to the rule of law can we ensure a fair and impartial judiciary that​ serves ‌the best interests⁣ of all Americans.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker