The daily wire

Jerry Nadler criticized for suggesting that a large number of undocumented immigrants are necessary for agricultural labor

Rep. Jerry Nadler Faces Backlash for ​Controversial Statement ‌on Immigration

During‌ a recent congressional hearing, Rep.⁣ Jerry Nadler (D-NY) sparked outrage with ‌his argument that the United States needs “many illegal immigrants.” This statement comes at a ⁢time when the country is grappling with a significant ⁤influx of undocumented ⁤individuals due to‍ President Joe Biden’s​ policies.

The remarks were made during a House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration Integrity, Security, and Enforcement hearing focused on the impact ‌of illegal immigration on social services. Nadler ⁢emphasized the importance of⁣ immigrants in the country, specifically highlighting the role of⁢ many ⁣illegal immigrants in ⁣picking vegetables.

“The fact is ​the birth rate in this country is way below replacement ⁢level, which means our population ⁤is going⁤ to ⁢start shrinking,” Nadler⁢ explained. “And‍ the ratio of ‌people on Social‌ Security ‌and Medicare​ is going to increase relative to the number of people supporting them.”

CLICK HERE⁣ TO GET‍ THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

Watch the video below:

Stephen Miller, a former immigration adviser in the⁤ Trump administration, responded to Nadler’s remarks, ⁢dismissing them as a tired and baseless cliché. He pointed out ​the absurdity of suggesting that millions of illegal ⁣immigrants ⁢from various countries are solely working in fields⁢ across major cities‍ like Chicago, Atlanta, ⁢Dallas,⁤ and ⁢New York.

Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) also criticized Nadler’s ‍statement,⁣ highlighting the diverse contributions‍ immigrants make to the economy, culture, and⁢ community. He emphasized ‍the need⁤ for a ⁤proper immigration process‍ and ​called for securing the border and fixing ⁣the⁣ broken immigration​ system.

How do critics respond to Nadler’s statement, and ⁢what concerns do they have about promoting illegal immigration?

That the ⁢presence of undocumented immigrants⁢ is essential to the functioning of various sectors in the United States, including agriculture, construction, and healthcare. He argued that without these workers, the economy would suffer and crucial ​industries would collapse.

However, Nadler’s statement‍ has drawn sharp ‌criticism from both Republicans and moderate Democrats. Many argue that ‌promoting illegal immigration undermines the rule of law and sends​ a message that immigration⁢ laws are not to be taken seriously. This backlash ⁢is particularly fierce considering the current circumstances, with thousands of ‌migrants crossing ⁣the southern border ‍every day in⁤ search of⁣ a better life.

Critics argue that Nadler’s statement not only condones illegal activity but also ignores the negative impact that illegal immigration can have on American workers and taxpayers. They claim that undocumented immigrants often compete with low-skilled American workers for jobs, driving down wages ⁣and worsening unemployment rates. Additionally, the strain on social services, such as healthcare and education, from accommodating undocumented immigrants can place an undue burden‌ on ‍taxpayers.

Furthermore, opponents argue ⁣that Nadler’s position overlooks⁢ the importance ⁤of proper ‍border security‍ and immigration enforcement. They assert that a strong and‌ secure border ⁢is essential ⁢for national security and the well-being of American communities. They also contend that without effective enforcement mechanisms, including deterring illegal entry and ensuring swift⁢ deportation of those who ⁢do not qualify for legal status, the problem ‍of illegal immigration will only persist and worsen over time.‌

In response to the ‌backlash, Nadler’s office released a statement clarifying his⁤ position. They stated that Nadler believes in comprehensive immigration reform​ that addresses the root causes of illegal immigration while providing a pathway to legal status for those⁤ who are already in the country. They⁣ emphasized‍ that his comments were⁢ not ‍meant to endorse or encourage illegal immigration but rather to highlight the economic benefits that immigrants, both legal and illegal, ‍bring to the United States.

However, many remain unconvinced by Nadler’s explanation, arguing that his original statement seemed to prioritize economic gains over the importance of upholding immigration laws and protecting American‌ workers and taxpayers. As the‌ debate on immigration rages ⁤on, it is clear that Nadler’s controversial statement has only further fueled the passionate discourse surrounding ⁤this complex and contentious issue.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker