Democratic Impeachment Attorney Claims ‘Bloodbath’ Isn’t Used for Economy, Webster’s Dictionary Disagrees
An Economic Term or Political Hyperbole? Rep. Dan Goldman Challenges “Bloodbath” Usage
In a fiery exchange on Monday, Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) sparked a debate over the appropriateness of using the term “bloodbath” in an economic context, a choice of words that Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary supports as valid.
Goldman, who earned recognition as lead counsel in the Democratic case against Donald Trump during the impeachment hearings, was countering a narrative that unfolded following Trump’s stark warning of a dire outcome for the auto industry should his 2024 campaign falter.
“When did ‘bloodbath’ become a go-to term for fiscal woes? Especially from someone whose rhetoric previously stirred up actual violence. The implication is clear. We don’t need any more of this gaslighting,” charged Goldman in his unequivocal rebuke.
When has ”bloodbath” ever been a term for economic conditions?
Particularly from someone tied to real-life violence post-election loss.
We get the subtext. Spare us the deception. https://t.co/GKiE3zPpvY
— Daniel Goldman (@danielsgoldman) March 18, 2024
Yet, delving into Merriam-Webster’s definitions, we find “bloodbath” can indeed refer to:
- An immense massacre
- A brutal and tumultuous conflict
- A significant economic downturn
An in-depth look at the complete context of Trump’s statement — often overlooked by some media reports hinting at an encouragement of violence — suggests his defenders may be right; his comments related to economic concerns about the automobile industry.
Decoding Trump’s Remarks at an Ohio Rally
Speaking at an Ohio rally, Trump’s comments targeted Chinese President Xi Jinping regarding plans by a Chinese-owned company to manufacture cars in Mexico to sidestep US tariffs.
“If I’m elected, imposing a 100% tariff on every car crossing the border, made outside the US, will be the norm.” Trump declared. “Without me, the consequences will be a ‘bloodbath,’ not just for autos but for the country.”
The word ”bloodbath” has undoubtedly sparked a linguistic standoff, with prominent political figures and dictionaries alike weighing in. Its usage here, while controversial, seems distilled to its lesser-known economic implications rather than any propensity for inciting violence, raising questions about the language used by politicians and the interpretations made by media and the public alike.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
