Witness in weaponization hearing contradicts own opening statement
The Democrats’ witness in Thursday’s House Weaponization hearing on government censorship contradicted her own opening statement.
Olivia Troye, a former advisor to Vice President Mike Pence, stated unequivocally in response to a question from GOP North Carolina Rep. Dan Bishop that she had never declared state censorship a “conspiracy.”
“I have never said this was a conspiracy. You have not heard that comment from me,” Troye said.
Except just an hour earlier in her opening statement, Troye railed against the committee’s proceedings as grounded in conspiracies.
“Instead of continuing to spread conspiracy theories about government censorship,” she said, “this committee should instead focus on the very real and very dangerous threat posed by the leading Republican candidate.”
Thursday’s House hearing of the Select Committee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government featured independent journalists and authors of the Twitter Files, Michael Shellenberger and Matt Taibbi, for a second time. The pair testified before lawmakers on government speech control two days after publishing the “CTIL Files” chronicling how the “Censorship Industrial Complex” was activated after the 2016 election. Whistleblower documents revealed the Cyber Threat Intelligence League (CTIL), which was officially launched as a volunteer project by data scientists and intelligence community veterans, became the premier “anti-disinformation group” whose tactics were ultimately adopted by the federal government.
“The whistleblower’s documents describe everything from the genesis of modern digital censorship programs to the role of the military and intelligence agencies, partnerships with civil society organizations and commercial media, and the use of sock puppet accounts and other offensive techniques,” they wrote.
“Two days ago,” Shellenberger said in his opening statement, “I published the first batch of internal files from the Cyber Threat Intelligence League which show U.S. and U.K. military contractors working in 2019 and 2020 to both censor and turn sophisticated psychological operations and disinformation tactics developed abroad against the American people.”
Democrats in the hearing made a point to defend the dystopian censorship regime as a necessary barrier to counter online disinformation while spreading disinformation themselves. New York Rep. Dan Goldman repeated the debunked line that the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden, made public by the New York Post, was a manipulated vehicle of Russian interference. The laptop exposed new details about the Biden family business operations, which are now under investigation by House Republicans in a presidential impeachment inquiry.
[READ:[READ:Dan Goldman Is A Hunter Biden Laptop Truther]
In a Substack post on Friday, Taibbi called the Democrats’ performance “bizarre.”
“Democrats not only show they don’t care,” Taibbi wrote, “they announce themselves as the chief advocates of new speech-control programs.”
Tristan Justice is the western correspondent for The Federalist and the author of Social Justice Redux, a conservative newsletter on culture, health, and wellness. He has also written for The Washington Examiner and The Daily Signal. His work has also been featured in Real Clear Politics and Fox News. Tristan graduated from George Washington University where he majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow him on Twitter at @JusticeTristan or contact him at [email protected]. Sign up for Tristan’s email newsletter here.
How did the witnesses, Michael Shellenberger and Matt Taibbi, describe the role of the Cyber Threat Intelligence League (CTIL) in government speech control
The Democrats’ witness in Thursday’s House Weaponization hearing on government censorship contradicted her own opening statement.
Olivia Troye, a former advisor to Vice President Mike Pence, stated unequivocally in response to a question from GOP North Carolina Rep. Dan Bishop that she had never declared state censorship a “conspiracy.”
“I have never said this was a conspiracy. You have not heard that comment from me,” Troye said.
Except just an hour earlier in her opening statement, Troye railed against the committee’s proceedings as grounded in conspiracies.
“Instead of continuing to spread conspiracy theories about government censorship,” she said, “this committee should instead focus on the very real and very dangerous threat posed by the leading Republican candidate.”
Thursday’s House hearing of the Select Committee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government featured independent journalists and authors of the Twitter Files, Michael Shellenberger and Matt Taibbi, for a second time. The pair testified before lawmakers on government speech control two days after publishing the “CTIL Files” chronicling how the “Censorship Industrial Complex” was activated after the 2016 election. Whistleblower documents revealed the Cyber Threat Intelligence League (CTIL), which was officially launched as a volunteer project by data scientists and intelligence community veterans, became the premier “anti-disinformation group” whose tactics were ultimately adopted by the federal government.
“The whistleblower’s documents describe everything from the genesis of modern digital censorship programs to the role of the military and intelligence agencies, partnerships with civil society organizations and commercial media, and the use of sock puppet accounts and other offensive techniques,” they wrote.
“Two days ago,” Shellenberger said in his opening statement, “I published the first batch of internal files from the Cyber Threat Intelligence League which show U.S. and U.K. military contractors working in 2019 and 2020 to both censor and turn sophisticated psychological operations and disinformation tactics developed abroad against the American people.”
Democrats in the hearing made a point to defend the dystopian censorship regime as a necessary barrier to counter online disinformation while spreading disinformation themselves. New York Rep. Dan Goldman repeated the debunked li
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
