Daniel Penny’s Fight To Be Free exposes the hierarchical, two-tiered justice system of leftists
On Wednesday, a Manhattan judge rejected a motion to dismiss several indictments filed against Marine Daniel Penny in relation to the death of an erratic ex-convict.
The incident in question occurred on May 21, when Jordan Neely — who had been arrested 44 times for “criminal conduct” and, at the time, “had an outstanding warrant for felony assault” — began threatening and getting violent with NYC subway passengers. During the episode, Neely allegedly kept repeating the phrases, “I’m going to kill you,” “I’m prepared to go to jail for life,” and “I’m willing to die.”
In response, Penny and two of his fellow passengers attempted to restrain Neely, which involved the former placing the latter in a headlock. Neely ultimately died during the encounter, with NYC’s medical examiner determining the death as a homicide.
Penny — who is currently out on bail for $100,000 — was indicted by a grand jury in June “on one count each of criminally negligent homicide and second-degree manslaughter.” If convicted, the former Marine could face up to 19 years in prison, according to the New York Post.
In his Wednesday ruling, Judge Maxwell Wiley reportedly denied Penny’s motion to dismiss the manslaughter case “because of alleged issues with prosecutors’ instructions to the grand jury and claims that the medical examiner didn’t establish that Penny’s actions killed Neely.” According to the Post, Wiley claimed Neely’s death certificate and testimony from the case’s medical examiner provided enough corroboration to “establish that defendant’s actions caused the death of Neely.”
Penny’s next court hearing is scheduled for March 20.
Unequal Application of the Law
Whereas Penny‘s ongoing prosecution and the criminalization of defending oneself and others against a threatening agitator is egregious, what’s particularly offensive is city residents’ unequal application of a single standard of justice for individuals who partake in similar acts of alleged misconduct.
Similar to Penny, Queens resident Jordan Williams — who is black — was charged by a Brooklyn prosecutor in June for his role in the death of an ex-convict on a Brooklyn subway. Video footage of the incident reportedly showed ex-con Devictor Ouedraogo “choking Williams and slugging his girlfriend,” actions which resulted in Williams stabbing Ouedraogo and the latter’s death.
This led prosecutors to charge Williams with “manslaughter and criminal possession of a weapon.”
Unlike Penny, however, prosecutors’ request that Williams be placed on a $100,000 cash bail was denied by a local judge. Less than a month later, a grand jury dismissed Williams’ charges altogether.
Neither Penny nor Williams should have been charged in the first place. Both men were clearly defending themselves and others against threatening, violent agitators. But NYC residents’ decision to indict Penny and not Williams is further emblematic of Democrats’ hierarchical worldview.
The American left doesn’t believe in a single standard of justice. Rather, it supports and actively fosters a system that levies punishment based on one’s political affiliation or identitarian features such as race or sexual orientation — not the merits of the case. It’s through this distorted worldview that NYC Democrats believe that Williams — who is black and therefore “oppressed” — should go unpunished while Penny — who is white, therefore privileged and an “oppressor” — should have the book thrown at him.
For Democrats, the facts of a case don’t matter. All that matters is whether the person on trial is wearing their team’s jersey. Everything else is secondary.
Shawn Fleetwood is a staff writer for The Federalist and a graduate of the University of Mary Washington. He previously served as a state content writer for Convention of States Action and his work has been featured in numerous outlets, including RealClearPolitics, RealClearHealth, and Conservative Review. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood
How does Penny’s indictment for defending himself raise questions about the boundaries and limitations of self-defense in the criminal justice system?
T for a grand jury indictment against Williams was reportedly denied. Instead, Williams was given a reduced charge of assault and allowed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor, resulting in a sentence of probation. This stark contrast in the handling of similar cases raises questions about the impartiality and fairness of the criminal justice system.
The case of Daniel Penny has gained significant attention and scrutiny, with many arguing that he was simply defending himself and others against a dangerous individual. The repeated threats and violent behavior exhibited by Jordan Neely on that fateful day certainly posed a threat to the safety of those around him. It is understandable that Penny and his fellow passengers took action to protect themselves and prevent any harm from coming to innocent bystanders.
However, despite the circumstances and the determination of the medical examiner that Neely’s death was a homicide, Penny finds himself facing serious charges. The indictment against him raises questions about the extent to which individuals can defend themselves without fear of criminal prosecution. It also brings into focus the responsibility of society and the legal system to protect its citizens from potentially dangerous individuals.
The unequal application of the law becomes particularly apparent when comparing Penny’s case to that of Jordan Williams. Both individuals were involved in altercations on New York City subways that resulted in the death of ex-convicts. However, while Penny faces charges of criminally negligent homicide and second-degree manslaughter, Williams was only charged with assault and ultimately received probation.
The handling of these cases raises concerns about racial bias, as Penny is a Marine and Williams is a black resident of Queens. The disparities in the charges and the outcomes of their legal proceedings suggest that individuals from different backgrounds are held to different standards when it comes to the application of justice. This further erodes trust in the legal system and fuels perceptions of inequality and injustice.
In order to maintain the public’s trust and confidence in the criminal justice system, it is imperative that cases like those of Daniel Penny and Jordan Williams be examined with utmost scrutiny and fairness. The application of the law should be consistent and unbiased, regardless of an individual’s background or circumstances. Without this assurance, the public’s confidence in the legal system will continue to diminish, further damaging the social fabric of our society.
As the legal proceedings continue for Daniel Penny, it is crucial that the judge, prosecutors, and defense attorneys thoroughly examine the evidence and ensure that justice is served. The outcome of this case will have significant implications for not only Daniel Penny but also for the perception of justice and fairness in our society. It is essential that the law be applied equally and without prejudice, so that the rights and safety of all individuals are protected.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
