Court sides strikes down California law on election-related AI deepfakes
A federal judge has ruled in favor of Elon Musk adn his social media platform X in their challenge against a California law that bans AI-generated deepfake content related to elections.The law required social media companies to remove such content within 72 hours of notification. Musk and X argued the law violated free speech rights. Judge John mendez ruled the law conflicted with Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects online platforms from liability for user-posted content.The judge did not address the free speech claims directly but indicated the state law improperly targeted the platforms themselves. california Governor Gavin Newsom had signed the law after concerns arose over deepfakes influencing elections,including instances of fake videos and robocalls during the 2024 election cycle. Newsom’s office remains supportive of labeling deepfakes despite the court’s decision. The judge also indicated plans to overturn a related law requiring labels on digitally altered campaign ads for similar constitutional reasons. The case was brought by musk, X, and other right-wing groups in response to rising worries about artificial intelligence’s impact on political discourse.
Court sides with Musk, X on California law restricting election-related AI deepfakes
A federal judge ruled in favor of billionaire Elon Musk and his X social media platform in their challenge to a California law that banned AI-generated, deepfake content related to elections.
The law required social media companies to remove deepfake content related to elections within 72 hours of reporting. Musk and the company joined the suit in November, citing free speech concerns.
Judge John Mendez cited federal rules for online platforms in his ruling. He said that the law violated Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects online platforms from liability for what users post on their sites.
“They don’t have anything to do with these videos that the state is objecting to,” Mendez wrote.
He did not give an opinion on the free speech arguments from the plaintiffs.
Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) signed the legislation into law last year after Musk and Trump supporters shared a fake video of then-Vice President Kamala Harris before the election. The law came as there have been increased concerns about the quick advancement of artificial intelligence and its impacts on political candidates.
During the 2024 election, deepfake robocalls impersonating former President Joe Biden were reported in New Hampshire. The FCC proposed a $6 million fine against the Democratic consultant behind the calls, and the perpetrator was indicted on over a dozen counts of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate.
Newsom spokesperson Tara Gallegos said the office “remain[s] convinced that commonsense labeling requirements for deep fakes are important to maintain the integrity of our elections,” as they review the decision.
FEMA’S FORK IN THE ROAD: ABOLITION OR SEAT AT THE CABINET
Mendez said he would move to overrule a second related law, which would require labels on digitally altered campaign posts and ads, for violating free speech protections.
The video’s creator, Christopher Kohls, originally filed the lawsuit with Musk, X, and two right-wing platforms, Rumble and Babylon Bee, later joining the suit.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
