Corporate media silent on Biden 25th Amendment discussion
For the past four years, there has been a lot of talk about invoking the 25th Amendment in relation to Donald Trump’s presidency. The media was obsessed with the idea, constantly discussing the possibilities of using this amendment to remove Trump from office. Now, with President Joe Biden in power, who often appears confused and disoriented, the media has gone silent on the topic. It’s quite remarkable how quickly they changed their tune.
During Trump’s time in office, the media was fixated on the 25th Amendment, even creating a montage of video clips from journalists discussing its potential use. They were eager to accuse Trump of mental and social issues that would disqualify him from office. However, now that Biden is in a similar state, the media refuses to address the issue. It seems that their interest in the 25th Amendment was purely political.
NewsBusters, a conservative watchdog, found over 600 search results for “25th amendment” between 2018 and early 2021. These results only include TV transcripts and don’t even account for clips from 2017. It’s clear that the media’s interest in the 25th Amendment was heavily biased against Trump.
The 25th Amendment allows for the removal of a president on the grounds of disability, and it seems that Biden’s cognitive decline should raise concerns. However, the media refuses to address this issue because Biden is a Democrat and a compliant participant in the political establishment. They don’t want to acknowledge his limitations because it doesn’t fit their narrative.
‘Significant Limitations’
Even Special Counsel Robert Hur, from Biden’s own Department of Justice, acknowledged the president’s memory and cognitive limitations. Yet, the media remains silent. It’s clear that their bias is protecting Biden because he aligns with their agenda.
Recently, U.S. Rep. Ken Buck introduced a resolution calling for Biden’s removal via the 25th Amendment. A Newsweek poll showed that over a third of U.S. adults support invoking the 25th Amendment to remove Biden from office. However, the media is well aware that removing Biden would result in Vice President Kamala Harris taking over, and they don’t want that.
The media’s silence on the 25th Amendment when it comes to Biden is a clear example of their bias and political agenda. They were quick to discuss it during Trump’s presidency but conveniently ignore it now. It’s time for the media to be held accountable for their double standards.
rnrn
How does the media’s selective coverage and biased reporting on the 25th Amendment undermine the integrity of the process and raise questions about their commitment to fair and unbiased reporting
The media frenzy surrounding the discussion of invoking the 25th Amendment during Donald Trump’s presidency was truly remarkable. It seemed as though every news outlet and journalist was fixated on the idea of removing Trump from office using this constitutional provision. Yet, now that Joe Biden has assumed the presidency, the media has gone surprisingly silent on the topic.
For the past four years, there was a constant barrage of speculation about Trump’s mental fitness for office. Journalists eagerly pointed out any sign of confusion or erratic behavior, using it as evidence to support their argument for invoking the 25th Amendment. They even went so far as to create montages of video clips from various sources, all discussing the potential use of this amendment.
However, now that Biden is in a similar state, appearing confused and disoriented on multiple occasions, the media refuses to address the issue. It is almost as if their interest in the 25th Amendment was purely political, aimed solely at removing a president they disagreed with.
Conservative watchdog organization, NewsBusters, conducted a search and found over 600 results for “25th Amendment” between 2018 and early 2021. This demonstrates the extent to which the media was obsessed with the idea of using this amendment against Trump. But now that Biden is in power, there is a notable absence of coverage and discussion on the topic.
The media’s hypocrisy and double standards are glaringly apparent. It is evident that their coverage of the 25th Amendment was driven by their political agenda rather than a genuine concern for the mental fitness of the President. This raises questions about the media’s objectivity and their commitment to fair and unbiased reporting.
The 25th Amendment was designed to address situations where a President is incapacitated and unable to fulfill their duties. It is a constitutional provision that should not be taken lightly or used as a political tool. The media’s selective coverage and biased reporting on this issue undermine the integrity of the process and the trustworthiness of the media itself.
It is important for the media to maintain consistency and fairness in their reporting. They should not cherry-pick which Presidents they scrutinize under the guise of the 25th Amendment. Their coverage should be based on principles of journalism, not political biases.
In conclusion, the media’s sudden silence on the 25th Amendment now that Biden is in power is noteworthy. It reveals the extent of their bias and political agenda. The media’s selective coverage undermines the integrity of the process and raises questions about their commitment to impartiality. As consumers of news, we must remain vigilant and demand accountability from the media in their reporting.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Auto Amazon Links: Could not resolve the given unit type, . Please be sure to update the auto-insert definition if you have deleted the unit.