This election is crucial for conservative families with children in the military
Why Red-State Families Should Consider Military Service
As Americans gear up for the 2024 election, it’s important to not only think about which candidate aligns with our values, but also to consider the present foreign policy issues and the impact they have on red-state families.
In 2023, we witnessed the continuation of the first major European war since WWII and the ignition of multiple potential regional conflicts around the world. Tragically, all three U.S. servicemembers who lost their lives in an Iran-backed drone attack were residents of the battleground state of Georgia. [source]
It’s worth noting that based on a 2020 report, nearly 48 percent of enlisted recruits across the Department of Defense, excluding the Coast Guard, came from states that voted Republican in 2020. When including the purple states of Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada, that number jumps to about 56 percent. This aligns with previous polling and conventional wisdom.
So, what does this mean? It means that red-state families are more likely to bear the burden and tragedy of combat casualties if the U.S. intervenes in another conflict. It would be conservative families who have to mourn their fallen children, who bravely defended some far-off land in the name of U.S. national security interests. This raises the question: why should conservatives continue to serve in the military when their values are constantly disregarded by those who make decisions about war?
Since the Biden administration took office in 2021, Americans have seen their freedoms limited in various aspects of life, including careers, healthcare, and religion. We’ve witnessed a lack of tolerance for differing opinions on Covid mandates, with calls for unequal access to medical care and employment. President Biden himself made dismissive remarks about the Second Amendment.
This administration, along with its Joint Chiefs of Staff, has repeatedly emphasized racial preferences, fear of white supremacy, and the need for “diversity.” Their disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan left behind billions of dollars worth of equipment, which fell into the hands of the Taliban. The extraction effort of Afghan allies and American contractors was also poorly executed, leaving many behind.
Thousands of Afghans who fought for their country were abandoned, and it was left to private organizations to rescue our allies and fellow countrymen who were contractors. Let’s not forget the tragic loss of 13 members of our military due to a suicide bomber.
Given these circumstances, it’s worth questioning whether conservatives should continue to prioritize military service. While supporting the individuals serving our country and praying for their safe return, we must acknowledge that this government does not deserve the dedication of our young people, especially considering their track record of failed wars and policies.
It is our duty to understand what we believe is worth sacrificing for, especially since history shows that it will likely be our children who bear the brunt of future conflicts. We must educate ourselves about the current geopolitical landscape and establish our own boundaries to avoid falling victim to government lies. Let’s remember the falsehoods that led to past wars, such as the “WMDs” in Iraq or the “Gulf of Tonkin Incident” that cost American lives.
Republicans should seriously consider whether a war against Russia over Ukraine or a war against China over Taiwan is worth the sacrifice of leaving their families and potentially never seeing their children again. With military recruits historically coming from conservative states, it’s crucial that parents, especially those who prioritize America First, educate themselves about foreign policy.
As we approach the 2024 election, let’s closely examine the candidates and their stances on foreign policy. The differences couldn’t be more apparent.
What impact does military service have on shaping U.S. foreign policy decisions and ensuring red-state values are taken into account?
Why Red-State Families Should Consider Military Service
As Americans gear up for the 2024 election, it’s important to not only think about which candidate aligns with our values but also to consider the present foreign policy issues and the impact they have on red-state families.
In 2023, we witnessed the continuation of the first major European war since WWII and the ignition of multiple potential regional conflicts around the world. Tragically, all three U.S. servicemembers who lost their lives in an Iran-backed drone attack were residents of the battleground state of Georgia. [source]
It’s worth noting that based on a 2020 report, nearly 48 percent of enlisted recruits across the Department of Defense, excluding the Coast Guard, came from states that voted Republican in 2020. When including the purple states of Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada, that number jumps to about 56 percent. This aligns with previous polling and conventional wisdom.
So, what does this mean? It means that red-state families are more likely to bear the burden and tragedy of combat casualties if the U.S. intervenes in another conflict. It would be conservative families who have to mourn their fallen children, who bravely defended some far-off land in the name of U.S. national security interests. This raises the question: why should conservatives continue to serve in the military when their values are constantly disregarded by those who make decisions about war?
Since the Biden administration took office in 2021, Americans have seen their freedoms limited in various aspects of life, including careers, healthcare, and religion. We’ve witnessed a lack of tolerance for differing opinions on Covid mandates, with calls for unequal access to medical care and employment. President Biden himself made dismissive remarks about the Second Amendment.
This administration, along with its Joint Chiefs of Staff, has repeatedly emphasized racial preferences, fear of white supremacy, and the need for “diversity.” Their disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan left behind billions of dollars worth of equipment, which fell into the hands of the Taliban. The extraction effort of Afghan allies and American contractors was also poorly executed, leaving many behind.
Thousands of Afghans who fought for their country and supported U.S. efforts were abandoned, while red-state families bore the direct consequences of a flawed foreign policy approach. It is clear that the values and concerns of red-state families are not prioritized or respected by decision-makers.
Considering these circumstances, red-state families should seriously consider military service as a means to influence policy decisions and ensure that their voices are heard. By joining the military, they can have a direct impact on shaping the future of U.S. foreign policy, ensuring that it aligns with their values and prioritizes the welfare of American citizens.
The sacrifices made by red-state families should not be in vain. By actively participating in the military, they have the opportunity to actively contribute to the decision-making process and advocate for the causes they believe in. It is through service and sacrifice that change can be brought about.
In conclusion, red-state families should consider military service as a means to actively shape U.S. foreign policy decisions and ensure that their values are taken into account. By serving in the military, they can have a direct impact on the outcomes of conflicts and the welfare of American citizens. It is through their bravery and commitment that the voices of red-state families can be heard and valued in the decision-making process.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
