Washington Examiner

Growing concerns over military response to Iran proxy attacks as experts express worry that the situation is not being taken seriously

A Call for ‌Action: United States⁣ Military Leaders Demand Stronger Response to Attacks

A⁢ series of attacks⁢ against U.S. forces, backed by Iran, has ‍sparked concern among former military leaders who argue that⁢ the Department of Defense has ⁤not adequately addressed the⁣ issue. These attacks, carried ⁢out by Iranian proxies, have targeted U.S. forces in Iraq ⁤and Syria multiple times since October.

The situation escalated further‍ when commercial vessels in nearby waterways fell victim ⁣to attacks, with the most significant incident occurring just days ago. Houthi ‌rebels in Yemen are believed to be ⁢responsible for⁤ these assaults.

“We are not ‍taking this seriously… We’re⁢ not deterring anybody right now.”

– Retired Vice Adm. John Miller

Retired Vice Adm. John⁤ Miller, former commander of ⁣U.S. 5th Fleet, expressed his concerns, stating that the attacks in Iraq and Syria have gone largely unanswered. He emphasized the need for⁤ a more⁢ serious approach to ​deter future attacks.

On Sunday, three commercial vessels were attacked in the southern Red⁢ Sea by forces originating from‌ Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen. The ​USS Carney, responding to distress calls, successfully defended the vessels from ⁣multiple drones while providing assistance.

National security⁤ adviser Jake Sullivan attributed the attacks to Iran, stating that there is reason to believe they were enabled by the Houthis. He also mentioned ongoing discussions with allies regarding the formation of a maritime task force to⁤ ensure safe passage of ships in the Red Sea.

Since their deployment to Iraq and Syria, U.S. forces have faced over 70 rocket or drone attacks ⁣from‌ Iranian proxies. These attacks, aimed at preventing the ‌reconstitution of ISIS, have resulted in injuries ​to more than 60 troops. However, all injured personnel have ‍returned to service.

The​ U.S. has responded with airstrikes targeting facilities used by the proxy forces. However, former Secretary ⁤of Defense Leon Panetta criticized the selective nature of these responses, calling for a more aggressive approach to protect ​U.S. forces.

“I want to go ‌after those who are firing missiles at our troops and make sure they ⁢understand that‍ when they fire‍ a missile ⁢— they are going to die.”

– Former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta

Former U.S.⁤ Central Command‌ spokesman Lt. Joe Buccino expressed his assessment ⁤that Iran does not perceive the current administration as having the will to inflict⁢ harm against‌ them or their proxies.

It is clear that urgent action is needed to address ⁤these attacks and ensure the safety of U.S. forces. The ‌voices⁣ of these military leaders serve as⁣ a reminder that a ‌stronger ‍response ⁣is necessary to deter future aggression.

Click here to read more from⁤ The Washington Examiner.

How has the lack⁤ of a strong response emboldened Iran​ and its proxies, leading to further incidents and escalating tensions in ⁢the region?

Believes⁤ that the lack of a strong response ‍has emboldened Iran and its proxies, leading to⁣ further​ incidents and escalating tensions in the region.

Vice Adm. Miller is not alone in his concerns. Several​ other former military leaders have joined him ‌in calling for a more robust response from the Department⁣ of Defense. They argue that the attacks against U.S. forces are not isolated incidents but part of a larger pattern of aggression ⁤from Iran and its allies.

The attacks against ‌commercial vessels in nearby waterways further ​highlight the need for a stronger response. These attacks not only ‌pose a threat⁣ to the U.S. and its allies ⁢but‌ also to global commerce and the stability of the region.

The former military leaders are calling for a comprehensive strategy ‌that includes both defensive and offensive measures. They argue that a strong response is necessary to deter further attacks and protect U.S. forces and‍ interests in the region.

They also emphasize the importance of working with international partners to address the issue. A united front against Iran and its proxies will send a clear message that their actions will not be tolerated. It is ⁢crucial to build a coalition that ⁤can collectively respond to ⁢these threats and ensure ⁣the⁣ safety and security of all parties involved.

The former military⁤ leaders acknowledge ⁢the complexities and challenges involved in ⁣responding to ⁤these attacks. They recognize‍ the risks of escalation and the need for careful ‍consideration of all ‌available options. However, they argue that​ inaction is not a sustainable ⁢strategy and that decisive action is necessary to maintain deterrence and protect ⁣American interests.

In conclusion, the recent series of attacks against U.S.‍ forces and commercial vessels in ⁢the region demands a stronger ⁤response from​ the Department ‍of Defense. The concerns voiced by former military leaders highlight the urgent need for action. It is crucial ​to send a clear message to Iran ‍and its proxies⁢ that their actions will not go‍ unanswered.‍ By working together with international partners, a comprehensive strategy can be developed⁣ to address these threats and ensure peace and stability in ⁤the region. The time for action‍ is now.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker