Hospital donors accused of influencing Ohio governor’s veto on transgender treatment, report reveals
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine Faces Backlash for Vetoing Transgender Bill
Governor Mike DeWine (R-OH) caused a stir when he vetoed House Bill 68, a measure aimed at protecting women’s athletics and limiting transgender medical treatment for minors. Critics are now questioning whether campaign donations influenced his decision.
A report by The Daily Caller News Foundation reveals that DeWine received around $40,000 in campaign donations between 2018 and 2023 from children’s hospitals and organizations supporting transgender medical treatment for minors.
The donations in question came from the Ohio Children’s Hospital Association (OCHA) ($20,000), Cincinnati Children’s Hospital ($300), Nationwide Children’s Hospital ($10,000), and ProMedica Children’s Hospital ($10,000).
ProMedica, a member of The Ohio Children’s Hospital Association and the largest hospital chain in Ohio also gave DeWine $10,000.
ProMedica seems to offer gender affirming care. pic.twitter.com/eVWWdhJdES
— Parker Thayer (@ParkerThayer) December 29, 2023
One of the hospitals, Cincinnati Children’s, even has a Transgender Health Center that provides medical treatment to children as young as five years old, without specifying an age limit for starting drugs like puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones.
Despite the controversy, DeWine defended his veto in a press conference, emphasizing the importance of protecting human life and sharing stories of parents who believe this treatment saved their children from dire consequences.
However, critics like NCAA-swimmer-turned-activist Riley Gaines are skeptical, suggesting that DeWine may have been influenced by the significant campaign donations he received.
Oh, so you mean Gov DeWine was compromised by dollar signs? Shocker…
They always follow the $$$$ pic.twitter.com/kGBTu1WWyG
— Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) December 31, 2023
Even former President Donald Trump criticized DeWine and the Ohio Republicans for their stance, expressing disappointment and calling for the legislature to overturn the veto quickly.
Were campaign donations from organizations supporting transgender medical treatment for minors a potential influencing factor in Governor DeWine’s decision to veto House Bill 68, and how does this raise questions about his stance on transgender rights
N, the Nationwide Children’s Hospital, and several transgender advocacy organizations. These organizations have openly supported the provision of gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth, including puberty blockers and hormone therapy.
House Bill 68, also known as the “Save Women’s Sports Act,” aimed to ensure fair competition in women’s athletics by requiring participants to compete in sports based on their biological sex at birth. It also sought to prohibit medical professionals from providing transgender minors with irreversible treatments such as hormone therapy or gender-affirming surgeries.
Proponents of the bill argued that it was necessary to protect the integrity of women’s sports and prevent potential unfair advantages that transgender females could have over their cisgender counterparts. They believe that allowing transgender females, who were assigned male at birth, to compete in women’s sports could lead to disparities in physical capabilities and ultimately jeopardize opportunities for biological females.
However, Governor DeWine, in his veto statement, expressed concerns about the potential consequences this legislation could have on transgender youth. He maintained that the bill was discriminatory and went against his promise to foster an inclusive and welcoming Ohio for all residents.
Critics of DeWine’s decision argue that campaign donations from organizations supporting transgender medical treatment for minors may have influenced his stance on the bill. They question whether his veto was driven by political considerations rather than a genuine belief in protecting transgender rights.
The controversial issue of transgender rights has been one of the most contentious and divisive in recent years, with passionate arguments on both sides. While some argue for expansive rights and protections for transgender individuals, others emphasize the importance of upholding traditional notions of gender and preserving the integrity of women’s sports.
Whether Governor DeWine’s veto was influenced by campaign donations or not, it is crucial to navigate these debates in a thoughtful and respectful manner. It is essential to recognize the complexity of the issue and the diversity of perspectives while working towards meaningful solutions that balance the rights and interests of all individuals involved.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
