The investigation centers on allegations that officials “bent the rules” or acted improperly in pursuing inquiries into Trump dating back to the 2016 election and subsequent federal cases.

Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida have been using a grand jury based in Fort Pierce to examine whether former intelligence and law enforcement officials can be tied together in a broader conspiracy case stemming from the Trump-Russia saga and later Trump-related prosecutions brought during the Biden administration.

Comey and others targeted in the investigation have rejected those claims, characterizing the investigation as politically motivated and part of a broader effort to revisit long-standing grievances tied to the Russia investigation and later prosecutions of Trump.

Bondi previously said the inquiry treats alleged abuses of law enforcement and intelligence authority as part of a conspiracy dating back to the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation.

The inquiry is being overseen by U.S. Attorney Jason Reding Quinones, with U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, an appointee of Trump who once oversaw and later dismissed the criminal classified documents case against him, handling the grand jury proceedings.

The inquiry, first made public last fall after a Trump-aligned attorney, Mike Davis, spoke of it in multiple interviews, has drawn scrutiny because many of the underlying events took place in Washington, not South Florida, fueling criticism that prosecutors are seeking a more favorable venue.

Brennan’s attorneys previously argued that the government was steering the matter toward Fort Pierce, where Cannon is the lone district judge, raising concerns about forum shopping.

Comey’s reported subpoena appears to fit into that larger strategy. The subpoena relates to his alleged role in drafting the January 2017 intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference, a document Trump allies have long argued was compromised by the inclusion of material tied to the Steele dossier. The broader inquiry has focused in part on how Obama-era officials handled and presented intelligence related to Russia and Trump.

‘THEATRICAL FOOLS’: HOUSE GOP SLAMS DEMOCRATS FOR BLOWING OFF BONDI INTERVIEW

Still, the legal path remains uncertain. Much of the conduct at issue has already been scrutinized through prior reviews and investigations, making it difficult for prosecutors to build a straightforward case based on underlying Russia investigation decisions from one decade ago.

The difficulty of threading the loop may also explain why investigators appear to be exploring whether a broader conspiracy could keep possible charges alive even where narrower false-statement allegations may now be time-barred.