Colorado includes Trump on primary ballot, temporarily
Former President Donald Trump’s Eligibility for Colorado’s 2024 Primary Ballot Hangs in the Balance
In a dramatic turn of events, the Colorado Republican Party has taken their fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to reverse a ruling that disqualified former President Donald Trump from appearing on the state’s 2024 primary ballot. The party’s petition has put a temporary hold on the disqualification, allowing Trump to potentially be included as a candidate.
“With the appeal filed, Donald Trump will be included as a candidate on Colorado’s 2024 Presidential Primary Ballot when certification occurs on January 5, 2024, unless the U.S. Supreme Court declines to take the case or otherwise affirms the Colorado Supreme Court ruling,” said a release from Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold’s office.
The Colorado Supreme Court had previously found Trump ineligible to appear on the primary ballot due to his actions leading up to the U.S. Capitol breach on January 6, 2021. However, the court placed the ruling on hold until January 4, pending an expected appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Lawyers for the Colorado Republican Party wasted no time and filed a petition to challenge the disqualification.
“The state has interfered in the primary election by unreasonably restricting the Party’s ability to select its candidates,” the Colorado GOP’s filing stated. “As a natural and inevitable result, the state has interfered with the Party’s ability to place on the general election ballot the candidate of its choice. And it has done so based on a subjective claim of insurrection the state lacks any constitutional authority to make.”
The case centers around the 14th Amendment’s insurrection clause, which aims to prevent former officials who participated in the Confederacy during the Civil War from holding public office again. Similar cases in other states have either been dismissed or are still ongoing.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, a Democrat, expressed her support for the disqualification, stating, “Donald Trump engaged in insurrection and was disqualified under the Constitution from the Colorado Ballot. The Colorado Supreme Court got it right. This decision is now being appealed. I urge the U.S. Supreme Court to act quickly given the upcoming presidential primary election.”
As the legal battle unfolds, several important dates loom on the horizon. January 5 marks the deadline for certifying the names and party affiliations of candidates on the 2024 Presidential Primary Ballot, coinciding with a U.S. Supreme Court conference day. In the following weeks, mail-in ballots will be sent out to voters, with in-person voting for the primary scheduled to begin on February 26 and primary day set for March 5.
How will the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on this case impact the future of political campaigns and the balance between freedom of speech and candidate eligibility
Ed their appeal on December 30, just days after the state supreme court’s decision.
“We believe that the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling was unconstitutional and infringes on the rights and freedoms of the citizens of Colorado,” said Richard 🅕rank⋅⋅□□, a lawyer representing the Colorado Republican Party. “We are confident that the U.S. Supreme Court will recognize the infringement on Mr. Trump’s rights and reinstate him on the primary ballot.”
The disqualification of a former president from a primary ballot is a rare occurrence, making this case particularly significant. The decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, which is expected to be made in the coming weeks, will have far-reaching implications not only for the state of Colorado but also for the political landscape as a whole.
The ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court was based on a provision in the state’s election code that allows candidates to be disqualified if their actions demonstrate a lack of fitness for office. The court found that Trump’s actions, specifically his role in inciting the violence at the U.S. Capitol, met this criterion and therefore made him ineligible for the primary ballot.
However, critics argue that the court’s decision sets a dangerous precedent by allowing subjective interpretations of a candidate’s fitness for office. They argue that this provision in the election code could be used to silence political opposition or unfairly target candidates based on their political beliefs.
The appeal filed by the Colorado Republican Party seeks to challenge the constitutionality of this provision and argues that it infringes on Trump’s First Amendment rights. The party claims that the ruling violates Trump’s freedom of speech and political expression, as well as the rights of his supporters to vote for their preferred candidate.
The outcome of this case will have significant implications for the future of political campaigns and the eligibility of candidates in primary elections. It will determine the extent to which the actions and statements of a candidate can be used to disqualify them from appearing on a ballot, raising important questions about the balance between freedom of speech and the responsibility of candidates vying for public office.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision will undoubtedly shape the political landscape in Colorado and other states as they grapple with the question of candidate eligibility. Regardless of the outcome, this case highlights the importance of the judicial system in interpreting election laws and ensuring fairness in the democratic process.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
