Colorado Supreme Court excludes Trump from 2024 ballot, sparking election controversy
The Colorado Supreme Court Keeps Trump Off 2024 Ballot
The Colorado Supreme Court recently made a controversial ruling that prevents former President Donald Trump from appearing on the 2024 ballot. This decision has sparked a heated debate, as it misinterprets a constitutional provision from the Civil War era that prohibits candidates who have “engaged in insurrection” from holding elected office.
In a 4-3 vote, the left-leaning court, which is predominantly composed of judges appointed by Democrat governors, decided to deny Colorado residents the opportunity to vote for the likely Republican presidential nominee. The Wall Street Journal has reported that this ruling would apply not only to the Republican primary but also to the general election.
“A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the judges wrote in their decision.
This ruling overturns a previous district court decision that found Trump guilty of “inciting” the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021. However, the district court argued that the constitutional provision regarding “insurrection” does not apply to the presidency. A similar attempt to remove Trump from the Minnesota ballot on the same grounds failed in November.
Trump’s campaign has vowed to appeal the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision. “The Colorado Supreme Court issued a completely flawed decision tonight, and we will swiftly file an appeal to the United States Supreme Court,” said Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung.
Democrats’ Lawfare Campaign Strategy
This ruling by the Colorado court is just the latest episode in the Democrats’ 2024 lawfare campaign strategy, which involves weaponizing the judicial system against their top political opponent. Trump currently faces a staggering 91 state and federal charges heading into next year’s election. Despite media claims of a potential “dictatorship” under Trump, President Joe Biden has more in common with strongman leaders like Vladimir Putin than the Republican front-runner does.
“They are willing to violate the U.S. Constitution at levels never seen before in order to win this election,” Trump stated, referring to Biden as “a threat to democracy.”
President Trump reacts to Colorado taking him off the ballot (for now): “They’re weaponizing law enforcement for high-level election interference because we’re beating them so badly in the polls.” pic.twitter.com/ytfBU2qRDg
Even one of Trump’s rivals for the Republican nomination, entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, criticized the Colorado ruling as ”an un-American, unconstitutional, and *unprecedented* decision.”
This is what an *actual* attack on democracy looks like: in an un-American, unconstitutional, and *unprecedented* decision, a cabal of Democrat judges are barring Trump from the ballot in Colorado. Having tried every trick in the book to eliminate President Trump from running in…
Meanwhile, federal prosecutors under Biden’s Department of Justice (DOJ) are aggressively pursuing a criminal conviction against Trump related to the January 6 riot, months before the election. The presiding U.S. district court judge, Tanya Chutkan, was appointed by Obama and has a reputation for handing down harsh sentences to individuals involved in the January 6 demonstrations.
Federalist Editor-in-Chief Mollie Hemingway recently reported on the left-wing effort to “fast-track” the criminal process against Trump. “District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan has done everything in her power to speed up the process for one of the complicated cases Democrats have filed against former President Donald Trump,” Hemingway wrote.
Tristan Justice is the western correspondent for The Federalist and the author of Social Justice Redux, a conservative newsletter on culture, health, and wellness. He has also written for The Washington Examiner and The Daily Signal. His work has also been featured in Real Clear Politics and Fox News. Tristan graduated from George Washington University where he majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow him on Twitter at @JusticeTristan or contact him at [email protected]. Sign up for Tristan’s email newsletter here.
In what ways does the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling set a dangerous precedent for future elections, according to the author
Mp’s staunchest supporters, Senator Ted Cruz, voiced his criticism of the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling. “This decision is a clear violation of the First Amendment rights of the American people. It sets a dangerous precedent for future elections,” Cruz said in a statement.
The Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling raises concerns about the politicization of the judiciary and the potential infringement on the rights of voters. By disqualifying a candidate based on a misinterpretation of a constitutional provision, the court undermines the democratic process and deprives voters of a choice. This decision should be viewed not only as an attack on Trump but also as a broader threat to the principles of free and fair elections.
It is worth noting that this is not the first time Democrats have attempted to use the legal system to remove Trump from the political arena. The failed impeachment trials, the Mueller investigation, and numerous other legal battles have been part of a concerted effort to undermine his presidency and discredit his political agenda. The Democrats’ strategy of lawfare highlights their desperation to hold onto power at any cost.
Furthermore, the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling sets a dangerous precedent for future elections. If a constitutional provision can be twisted and misinterpreted to exclude a candidate from the ballot, it opens the door for further manipulation of the electoral process. This erosion of the democratic process is a threat to the fundamental rights of all Americans.
As Trump’s campaign prepares to appeal this ruling to the United States Supreme Court, it is crucial for the highest court in the land to uphold the principles of free and fair elections. The justices must carefully consider the constitutional implications of the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision and ensure that the rights of voters are protected.
The outcome of this appeal will have far-reaching implications for the 2024 election and the future of American democracy. It will determine whether the judiciary remains an impartial arbiter or succumbs to partisan manipulation. The eyes of the nation are now on the Supreme Court, as it has the power to defend the integrity of the electoral process and uphold the constitutional rights of all Americans.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
