Colorado GOP Cancels Primary If Trump Excluded from Ballot
Colorado Republican Party Threatens to Cancel Primary if Trump is Kept off Ballot
The Colorado Republican Party made a bold statement on Tuesday night, declaring that they would cancel the presidential primary altogether if former President Donald Trump was excluded from the ballot in the state’s 2024 election.
The party’s response came after the Colorado Supreme Court removed Trump from the ballot, accusing him of inciting an insurrection on January 6, 2021. The court’s ruling stated that Trump’s actions disqualified him from holding the office of President under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In defiance of the ruling, the Colorado GOP announced, “We will withdraw from the Primary as a Party and convert to a pure caucus system if this is allowed to stand.”
However, the ruling will be put on hold until January 4, pending appeal.
The Trump campaign swiftly responded, vowing to appeal the decision and criticizing it as “deeply undemocratic.” They expressed confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court would rule in their favor.
The Colorado Supreme Court justified their ruling by stating that there was substantial evidence of an insurrection on January 6, characterized by a concerted use of force to hinder the peaceful transfer of power.
Heritage Foundation election law expert, Hans von Spakovsky, condemned the ruling as “nakedly partisan” and “anti-democratic.” He argued that Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment only applies to specific individuals and that Trump has not been convicted of insurrection or rebellion.
Von Spakovsky also pointed out that some scholars question the validity of Section Three, as it may have been rendered obsolete by past legislation. He emphasized that the court lacks the authority to enforce Section Three without federal legislation.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
Should a technicality be enough to prevent a former president and influential figure within a party from appearing on a primary ballot? How should the party prioritize the opportunity for voters to have a say in the candidate selection process
Hough they are still in the early stages of the nominating process. This threat came as a response to the possibility of former President Donald Trump being kept off the ballot in Colorado.
The controversy stems from a recent decision by the Colorado Secretary of State’s Office to exclude Trump from the state’s primary ballot. According to reports, this decision was made due to a technicality related to the submission of paperwork by Trump’s campaign.
However, the Colorado Republican Party is not taking this matter lightly. They have argued that it is unfair to disenfranchise Republican voters by denying them the opportunity to support their preferred candidate. Canceling the primary is seen as a way to send a strong message that this decision will not be tolerated.
The Colorado Republican Party’s move to cancel the primary has been met with mixed reactions. On one hand, some party members and supporters of Trump see it as a necessary step to protect the interests of Republican voters. They argue that denying Trump a place on the ballot would be an injustice and could lead to decreased voter enthusiasm and participation in the primary.
On the other hand, there are those who believe that canceling the primary would be an overreaction and may ultimately do more harm than good. They argue that the Republican Party should instead focus on resolving the technical issue that led to Trump’s exclusion from the ballot. By canceling the primary, they argue, the party is undermining the democratic process and setting a dangerous precedent.
The controversy surrounding Trump’s potential exclusion from the Colorado primary ballot raises important questions about the fairness and integrity of the nominating process. Should a technicality be enough to keep a former president and influential figure within the party off the ballot? Or should the party prioritize the opportunity for voters to have a say in the candidate selection process?
These questions are not unique to Colorado. In fact, similar disputes have arisen in other states during previous election cycles. They highlight the need for clear guidelines and a fair and transparent process for determining who can appear on the primary ballot. This ensures that the voices of the voters are respected and that the nomination process remains credible.
As the controversy continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether the Colorado Republican Party will follow through with its threat to cancel the primary. Regardless of the outcome, this situation serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the democratic principles upon which our political system is built.
In the coming weeks and months, the Colorado Republican Party will have to navigate this challenge and decide on the best course of action. It is imperative that they do so in a manner that reflects the interests of their constituents and preserves the integrity of the primary election process. Only time will tell how this situation will ultimately unfold, and what impact it will have on the future of the Republican Party in Colorado.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
