The daily wire

CNN legal expert criticizes Democrats’ attempt to bar Trump from the ballot, deeming it futile and potentially boosting his chances of winning the White House

CNN Analyst Slams Democrats’ Failed Attempt to Remove Trump from⁤ Ballot

In a scathing critique, CNN senior legal analyst and New York Magazine columnist Elie Honig blasted Democrats for ​their futile efforts to remove former President​ Donald Trump from the ballot. Honig argues that not‌ only was the attempt ⁢doomed from ⁣the start, but it will also only serve ⁤to strengthen Trump’s position moving forward.

The Supreme Court’s Unanimous​ Ruling

The Supreme Court recently ‍issued ⁤a ‌unanimous ruling stating that the⁢ state of Colorado cannot⁢ exclude Trump from the primary ballot using ‌Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. This ruling, with a vote of 9-0, further solidifies Trump’s⁤ eligibility.

Honig dismisses the ‍idea that Trump’s removal was ever a realistic⁣ possibility, calling ​it‍ a “wild law-school hypothetical sprung to life.” He⁤ believes that this⁣ failed attempt will only provide Trump with more ammunition in his quest to regain ⁤the White House.

“You’ll be forgiven​ if you expected a different ⁤result. After all, we’ve endured months ⁢of cocksure‍ guarantees from leading constitutional scholars that ‌Colorado’s application of the 14th Amendment ‍against Trump was legally ‘unassailable in every single respect’ — this from a retired judge who assured us not to worry because ‘I’ve been studying this specific question in great ⁣detail ​for the past three years. So, you know, I consider myself, personally, an expert on the question.’​ Other thought leaders offered up an ‘amen’ chorus, disparaging any argument that the 14th⁤ Amendment might not work as ‘extremely weak’ and ‘just complete nonsense.’ ⁢Turns⁣ out you can’t bludgeon the Constitution into the ground with ‍hyperbolic, conclusory rhetoric.”

Honig points out that previous attempts to prevent Trump from holding ‌office using the 14th Amendment have also failed. He highlights the Supreme Court’s rejection of the state-by-state approach and‍ the surprising cross-ideological consensus among the justices.

“The​ Supreme Court has now ⁤made clear‍ what was already apparent on the face of the Constitution itself: Without some specific enabling‌ act of Congress, it’s not up⁢ to the ⁤states. This shouldn’t have been some sort of mystery. ⁢It’s right there in the⁣ 14th Amendment’s plain text: ‘The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the‌ provisions of ⁤this article.’ At any point since the 14th Amendment’s ratification in 1868, Congress could⁢ have passed a law saying, in essence, ‘We’ll let the states ⁣decide, so long as they use reasonably fair procedures.’ But it’s ‌been 150-plus years now and Congress has done no ⁤such thing. Unless and⁤ until that changes,⁣ the 14th Amendment will remain a dusty, nonfunctional⁢ curiosity.”

Honig concludes by highlighting the wasted resources, loss of ⁤credibility, ‌and political‍ capital that went into this futile endeavor. He predicts that Trump’s supporters⁢ will‍ rally around this failed effort, viewing it as an attempt by elitist law professors to deny voters a⁣ choice and undermine⁣ the ‍Republican front-runner.

Related: ‘Absolutely​ Bats***’: Colorado Democrat Dragged For MSNBC⁢ Melodrama Over SCOTUS Ballot Ruling

How⁣ does the ⁣failed attempt to remove⁣ Trump from⁣ the ballot impact his political standing?

Rt on ⁣this.'”​​

The Impact on Trump’s Standing

Honig points‍ out that ​the Democrats’ failed attempt to ‍remove Trump from the⁣ ballot⁢ will only strengthen his political position. He⁤ argues that ⁢Trump can now present himself as a victim of unfair treatment, rallying⁢ his supporters and ⁢enhancing his appeal to voters.

The attempts to⁣ remove Trump from the⁣ ballot only serve⁤ to further energize his base and⁣ solidify their ⁤loyalty. Trump can ‌now use this as evidence that ​he is⁤ being unjustly targeted by Democrats, reinforcing the narrative that he ‍is the target of a witch hunt and a symbol of resistance against the “establishment.”

A Lesson for ⁢Democrats

Honig⁢ emphasizes‍ the ⁤need​ for ⁢Democrats⁤ to choose their⁢ battles carefully and avoid engaging in ‌futile endeavors. He suggests that Democrats should focus⁣ their efforts elsewhere, such as ​developing ⁢strong ‌policy platforms and presenting a clear alternative vision for the country.

The failed attempt to ‌remove Trump from the ballot is a wake-up call for Democrats, reminding‌ them that they ⁤cannot rely solely on legal‌ maneuvers to achieve‌ their goals. Honig⁣ urges Democrats to focus on winning over⁤ voters with compelling ideas and‍ effective campaigns rather than wasting their energy ⁢on doomed tactics.

Conclusion

CNN analyst Elie Honig’s ​scathing critique of the Democrats’ failed attempt⁢ to remove ‍Donald⁤ Trump from the⁢ ballot‍ highlights‍ the futility of their efforts and the⁢ unintended​ consequences of ‌their actions. ​Honig warns that⁢ such⁢ attempts only serve to strengthen Trump’s position and rally his supporters, further solidifying his‌ appeal to voters. He advises ​Democrats to learn from this experience and focus on more ⁢productive endeavours ‌in their quest to ​regain ​political power.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker