Christie slams Ramaswamy: ‘Obnoxious blowhard,’ ‘Smart mouth
Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Clashes with Entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy in Heated Debate
The fourth Republican Party presidential primary debate in Alabama hosted by NewsNation turned into a fiery exchange between former Governor Chris Christie and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy. The clash erupted when Ramaswamy criticized former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley’s “foreign policy wisdom.”
Ramaswamy Challenges Haley’s Knowledge on Ukraine
Ramaswamy took aim at Haley’s foreign policy stance regarding the war between Russia and Ukraine. He pointed out that neither Haley nor Joe Biden could name three provinces in eastern Ukraine that they would send troops to fight for.
Looking directly at Haley, Ramaswamy emphasized the disconnect between her desire to send troops and her lack of knowledge about the provinces involved. He argued that real foreign policy experience cannot be gained from a brief stint at the U.N. followed by lucrative post-political careers.
Christie Fires Back at Ramaswamy
Christie did not hold back in his response to Ramaswamy’s criticisms. He harshly criticized Ramaswamy’s remarks and his own plan for dealing with Russia in Ukraine. When Ramaswamy attempted to push back, Christie unleashed his frustration, accusing Ramaswamy of consistently making controversial statements during debates and then denying them.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
Christie’s frustration with Ramaswamy reached its peak as he shouted, “You do this at every debate! You go out on the stump and say something, we confront you on the debate stage, and then you back away.” He labeled Ramaswamy as “the most obnoxious blowhard in America” and demanded that he “shut up for a little while.”
Ramaswamy Responds with a Sharp Retort
Ramaswamy, seemingly unfazed by Christie’s outburst, responded with a sarcastic remark. He pointed out that Christie himself lacked knowledge about the provinces in eastern Ukraine that he wanted to fight for. Ramaswamy dismissed Christie’s foreign policy experience, referring to his controversial decision to close a bridge between New Jersey and New York. He suggested that Christie should exit the race and enjoy a nice meal instead.
“This is the fourth debate that you would be voted in the first 20 minutes as the most obnoxious blowhard in America,” Christie said. “So shut up for a little while!”
Ramaswamy responded by laughing and saying, “So, first of all, I think we just learned something from Chris Christie.”
“First of all, Chris Christie also doesn’t know what provinces in eastern Ukraine he actually wants us to fight for,” Ramaswamy said. “Chris, your version of foreign policy experience was closing a bridge from New Jersey to New York. So do everybody a favor, just walk yourself off that stage, enjoy a nice meal, and get the hell out of this race.”
Christie’s Final Remarks
Christie, not one to back down, concluded the exchange by referring to Ramaswamy’s “smart a** mouth.” He contrasted his own experience as the U.S. Attorney in New Jersey after 9/11 with Ramaswamy’s time at Harvard, suggesting that Ramaswamy was a Democrat back then.
How did former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie respond to Ramaswamy’s criticisms during the debate
L=”https://www.dailywire.com/topic/chris-christie”>Chris Christie Clashes with Entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy in Heated Debate
The recent presidential primary debate in Alabama witnessed a fiery exchange between former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy. The clash occurred when Ramaswamy voiced his criticism of former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley’s stance on foreign policy matters.
Ramaswamy Challenges Haley’s Knowledge on Ukraine
Ramaswamy specifically questioned Haley’s foreign policy position regarding the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine. He highlighted the fact that neither Haley nor Joe Biden could name three provinces in eastern Ukraine where they would consider deploying troops. This lack of knowledge, according to Ramaswamy, called into question Haley’s credibility and ability to formulate an informed foreign policy strategy.
Directly addressing Haley, Ramaswamy underlined the disconnect between her willingness to send troops and her apparent unfamiliarity with the specific regions involved in the conflict. He argued that genuine foreign policy experience cannot simply be attained through a short tenure at the U.N., followed by lucrative post-political careers.
Christie Fires Back at Ramaswamy
True to his reputation, Christie did not shy away from delivering a forceful response to Ramaswamy’s criticisms. He rebuked Ramaswamy’s remarks while simultaneously outlining his own plan for dealing with Russia’s involvement in Ukraine. As Ramaswamy tried to counter Christie’s rebuttals, the former governor vented his frustration, accusing Ramaswamy of consistently making controversial statements during debates only to later deny having made them.
The heated exchange between Christie and Ramaswamy highlights the intensity and drama often associated with political debates. It also underscores the importance of thorough knowledge and understanding of international affairs when formulating foreign policy positions.
While Christie and Ramaswamy may have differing opinions on various matters, their clash encourages public discourse and critical examination of the ideas put forth by political candidates. Debates provide a platform for candidates, such as Christie and Ramaswamy, to express their viewpoints and challenge the perspectives of their opponents, ultimately contributing to an informed electorate.
As the race for the presidency continues, it is crucial that voters carefully evaluate the positions and statements made by candidates. Engaging in robust discussions, such as the one witnessed between Christie and Ramaswamy, allows for a deeper understanding of the issues at hand and aids in the selection of a candidate who best aligns with one’s own values and beliefs.
In conclusion, the clash between former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy during the recent Republican presidential primary debate showcased the intensity and fireworks commonly associated with political debates. It serves as a reminder of the importance of informed foreign policy positions and promotes public discourse on crucial matters. As the political landscape continues to evolve, it is paramount that voters engage in critical analysis of candidates’ statements and engage in respectful yet impassioned debates that ultimately lead to a more informed and engaged electorate.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
