CA secretary of state to challenge decision permitting Vince Fong on primary ballot
California Secretary of State Vows to Appeal Court Ruling Allowing Republican Assemblyman on Primary Ballot
California Secretary of State Shirley Weber expressed her disappointment at a court ruling allowing Republican Assemblyman Vince Fong to appear on the primary ballot for two separate races and said she will appeal the ruling.
Disappointment and Determination
Weber had blocked Fong from appearing on the primary ballot for the state’s 20th Congressional District because she said he had already filed to run for his current seat in the state Assembly, and the election code prevents candidates from appearing on the ballot for two separate offices. However, the Sacramento Superior Court ruled on Thursday that the California election code Weber cited to remove him from the congressional ballot did not apply to Fong.
Weber said in a statement on Friday that she is “gravely concerned about the consequences” of the ruling and is concerned about “confusion” and “disenfranchisement” if Fong were to win both races.
Strong Disagreement and Ongoing Battle
“I strongly disagree with the outcome of this case, and I am gravely concerned about the consequences of today’s ruling,” Weber said. “I do agree, however, with the Court’s expressed concern that this ruling ‘may result in voter confusion and the disenfranchisement of voters if Fong is ultimately elected for both offices but does not retain one’ and that it ‘defies common sense to find the law permits a candidate to run for two offices during the same election.’”
She said her office would be appealing the ruling but that in the interim, he would be placed on the ballot for the March 2024 primary. Weber’s certified candidates list for the primary released on Thursday evening included Fong.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Protecting Voters and Ensuring Confidence
“As California’s chief election official, it is my duty to take steps necessary to protect voters. As such, my office will appeal this ruling in an effort to ensure that voters in future elections will not become disenfranchised, be left without representation, or become subject to other unforeseen negative consequences that would erode confidence in our elections,” Weber wrote.
Fong, who is backed by outgoing Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) to fill his House seat, initially said he would not seek McCarthy’s seat, but after another ally of the former House speaker, GOP state Sen. Shannon Grove, opted not to run, Fong announced his candidacy.
1) What are the potential consequences of allowing candidates to run for multiple offices simultaneously?
Was unconstitutional, and therefore Fong should be allowed to appear on the primary ballot for both races.
Secretary of State Weber expressed her disappointment at the court’s ruling, stating that she believes it undermines the integrity of the election process. She emphasized the importance of upholding election laws and ensuring that all candidates adhere to them in order to maintain a fair and transparent democratic system.
Weber’s determination to appeal the court’s decision stems from her commitment to safeguarding the democratic principles upon which our nation was founded. She firmly believes that candidates should not be allowed to run for multiple offices simultaneously, as this can potentially create conflicts of interest and dilute the representation of the constituents they are supposed to serve.
The role of Secretary of State is crucial in maintaining the integrity of elections and protecting the rights of voters. Shirley Weber understands the weight of her responsibilities and is dedicated to fulfilling them diligently. She has been a champion for fair and equitable elections throughout her career, advocating for measures to enhance voter access and combat voter suppression.
This court ruling presents a significant challenge to the election process in California. If candidates are allowed to run for multiple offices simultaneously, it could potentially open the door for strategic moves by political parties to manipulate elections and consolidate power. Secretary Weber’s commitment to appeal the ruling showcases her determination to prevent such scenarios and preserve the democratic principles our nation holds dear.
It’s important to note that Assemblyman Vince Fong has defended his actions, arguing that the election code should not limit his ability to pursue opportunities to serve the public. He maintains that running for multiple offices allows him to broaden his impact and better represent the interests of his constituents.
However, Secretary Weber firmly believes that the election code should be upheld and that candidates should be limited to running for only one office at a time. She views it as a necessary safeguard to prevent potential conflicts of interest and ensure that candidates are fully dedicated to the positions they are seeking.
The appeal process will undoubtedly involve further legal scrutiny and deliberation. The outcome will not only impact the candidacy of Assemblyman Vince Fong but also set a precedent for future election processes in California. As such, it is crucial that this matter be thoroughly examined to determine the best course of action in upholding the integrity and fairness of our elections.
Secretary of State Shirley Weber’s decision to appeal the court’s ruling is a testament to her unwavering dedication to preserving the democratic principles that underpin our electoral system. Her commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring fair elections serves as a beacon of hope for all Californians who value the integrity of our democratic processes.
As the appeal process unfolds, all eyes will be on the judicial system to make a decision that protects the rights of voters and maintains the integrity of elections in California. Secretary Weber’s firm stance showcases her willingness to fight for what she believes is right, even in the face of adversity. Through her actions, she demonstrates her commitment to ensuring a fair and equitable democratic process for all.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."