California lawmakers aim to prohibit tackle football for children under 12

Proposal to ⁣Ban⁣ Tackle Football for Children Under 12 in California Advances

A proposal to ban tackle football for children under 12 in California has made progress, passing an Assembly committee 5-2 on Wednesday. The proposal, ⁤known as Assembly Bill 734, was introduced by California​ Democrat Kevin ​McCarty of Sacramento. It aims to⁢ transition ‌youth football teams towards flag football for ⁢kids under 12, as reported by KCRA. ⁣This is McCarty’s ⁣third attempt to ⁣pass the bill, ⁣emphasizing the safety ‍concerns associated with contact football for young‍ children.

The bill includes a‌ phased approach, ⁣gradually phasing out tackle⁣ football‍ for different age groups.​ Starting in 2025, tackle football would be ⁣prohibited for kids under 6, followed⁢ by kids⁣ under 10 in​ 2027, and finally ​all children⁢ under 12 in 2029. ⁣The bill now needs to be passed by both the Assembly​ and the Senate before it can reach Governor⁤ Gavin Newsom’s ⁣desk.

This proposal comes at a time when safety ‌precautions ​to prevent concussions are being prioritized by⁢ league leaders in college ⁤and professional football. The NFL has been ⁢actively promoting ⁣flag ⁤football worldwide and has even helped it become an Olympic sport, set to debut at the 2028 Olympic games in Los Angeles.

During‍ the ​Assembly committee ⁢hearing, many parents who oppose the legislation attended,‌ bringing their children in football uniforms. Ashley Bertram, a mother of three boys, strongly criticized the proposal, viewing it as an ​infringement on parental rights. She argued‍ that flag football ‍can be more dangerous than ⁢tackle ⁤football due to the lack of⁤ similar protective gear.

Tyrone Jones, a youth​ and‍ high⁤ school football coach in‌ the ⁤Bay Area, also expressed his disagreement with the bill, stating that it pushes ⁣the sport “in the⁣ wrong direction.” He believes that the benefits of football ⁢outweigh the limited risk ⁤of injury.

Assemblymember Mike Gipson, another ​California Democrat, ‌voted in favor of the bill, highlighting that it ‍does ⁤not diminish​ the positive learning opportunities​ that football provides for the state’s youth. Gipson, who chairs the⁣ state Assembly’s sports regulation committee, emphasized ‍that the transition to flag football would still ​offer valuable learning experiences.

CLICK HERE ⁤TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

How have other states that have implemented bans on tackle football for children under 12 seen ⁤a ​shift towards safer alternatives like flag⁣ football?

Rent age groups. The first phase ‌would ban tackle football for children under 12, while the second phase would extend the ban to children under 14. The third and final phase would prohibit tackle football for children under 16. This approach allows for a gradual ‌transition ⁢and ensures that children have the opportunity to develop their skills and understanding of the game in a safer environment.

The proposed ban on tackle football for children under 12 is ‌a response ⁤to growing ⁤concerns about the ​long-term effects of repetitive head trauma associated with the sport. Studies have shown that repeated concussions and sub-concussive ‍hits can⁣ have serious consequences⁣ for brain health, particularly ⁣in developing brains. Children are particularly vulnerable ⁤to these effects due⁢ to their⁣ still-developing brains and bodies.

Supporters of the ban ⁣argue‍ that it is a necessary step to protect the well-being and long-term ‍health of young athletes. They point ⁢to the ​success ‌of similar bans ​in other states, ‌such ⁢as Illinois and New York, ⁣where tackle​ football has been banned for children under 12. ⁢These states have seen a⁤ shift towards ⁤flag football, which⁢ provides a‌ safer alternative ⁣while‌ still​ allowing children to participate in the sport they love.

Opponents⁣ of⁢ the ⁤ban, however,‍ argue that it‌ is an overreach of government authority ⁤and that parents should⁢ have‍ the ultimate say in whether their children participate in tackle football. They claim that football ‌teaches valuable lessons‌ such as ⁤teamwork, discipline, and perseverance, and that the risk of injury is ‌inherent in any sport.

While both‌ sides of the ‌argument have ‌valid points,‍ it is crucial to prioritize the well-being and safety of young athletes. Football has evolved ⁢over the years to address‍ safety concerns, ⁤with ​rule changes and improved equipment. However, the risks associated with tackle football still exist, particularly for⁢ young children​ whose bodies are still developing.

By transitioning towards flag football, children​ can ‍still​ learn the fundamentals of the sport without‌ exposing themselves to unnecessary risk. Flag football provides a way for children‍ to enjoy the game and develop their ⁤skills while minimizing⁣ the potential for ‌head injuries. It promotes agility, coordination, and strategic thinking, all ​essential aspects of football, without the physicality of tackling.

Furthermore, the ban on ‍tackle football for ‌children under 12 does ⁣not⁢ mean‍ the end of ‌their ‌football journey. Once they reach⁣ the appropriate‍ age, they can transition to tackle ⁤football with a stronger​ foundation and ⁤understanding of the game. This phased approach allows them to develop their skills gradually and ensures their safety throughout their football journey.

The proposal to ban tackle football for children under ⁢12‌ in California is a significant step towards prioritizing the safety and well-being of young athletes. It acknowledges the risks associated with repetitive head trauma and ​provides ‌a safer alternative for children to participate ⁤in the ⁣sport they ⁢love. By gradually transitioning towards flag football, children can still experience the​ joy‌ of playing football while minimizing the potential for ‍long-term health consequences. It is a necessary measure to ⁢protect the future generations of athletes and ensure their physical and mental well-being.