California Democrats race to pass bills to stop Trump agenda before session ends

The article discusses efforts by California Democrats too rapidly pass a series of bills aimed at countering key parts of former President Donald Trump’s agenda before the state legislative session ends. These measures are focused on protecting abortion access, LGBT rights, and immigrant rights, directly opposing recent federal actions and policies initiated under Trump.

A prominent bill, AB260, would allow pharmacists to dispense abortion medications without disclosing patient or provider information on the label, safeguarding access especially in rural areas. It also protects providers from penalties and prosecutions.AB54 complements this by protecting healthcare providers from criminal charges in other states when providing abortion care that is legal in California.

In response to Trump’s immigration crackdown and attempts at mass deportations, several bills seek to restrict federal immigration enforcement within the state. This includes SB627, requiring law enforcement officers to display identification and prohibiting masked agents (with some exceptions), and SB805, which limits bounty hunter involvement. Others aim to shield residents’ personal information from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and protect schools from sharing student information without legal warrants.

Governor Gavin Newsom supports these measures, affirming California’s commitment to reproductive rights and opposing federal interference. Despite Republican opposition, Democrats’ legislative supermajority in California enables them to advance these bills swiftly, with a deadline to finalize them before September 12.California is positioning itself as a stronghold against federal policies limiting abortion rights, immigration protections, and related civil liberties.


California Democrats race to pass bills to stop Trump agenda before session ends

California lawmakers are racing to push through dozens of new bills over the next two weeks aimed at stopping President Donald Trump’s agenda, including efforts he’s made to restrict abortion access, limit LGBT rights, and carry out mass deportations

Most of the measures have already cleared legislative hurdles but lack the final votes needed and Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D-CA) signature to become law. Democrats have the supermajority in the state legislature, meaning they will have little to no pushback on key bills. Their only problem now is getting as many through the state Assembly and state Senate as possible before Sept. 12. 

One bill that Democratic lawmakers are eager to get over the finish line would allow pharmacists to dispense abortion drugs without the names and addresses of the patient, pharmacy, or doctor on the label. The bill, introduced by Assemblywoman Cecilia Aguiar-Curry (D-CA), is in direct response to Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s efforts to reevaluate federal approvals of abortion medication. 

“[Assembly Bill] 260 is about ensuring Californians have the freedom to make decisions about their own bodies without fear or interference from political agendas,” Majority Leader Aguiar-Curry said. “It safeguards providers, strengthens access through telehealth, and ensures Mifepristone—a safe, [Food and Drug Administration]-approved medication for over 20 years—remains legal and available throughout California, especially for those in rural and underserved areas.”

Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision overturned Roe v. Wade, many states have enacted strict abortion bans. California has done the opposite.

“AB 260 positions California as a bulwark against these changes, ensuring state-level protections remain intact amid federal uncertainty,” Aguiar-Curry said, adding that the bill would also shield abortion medication providers from civil penalties, criminal prosecution, and professional discipline. 

Newsom called Kennedy’s plan to reevaluate federal approvals of abortion medication “another attack on women’s reproductive freedom and scientifically-reviewed health care.”

“California will continue to protect every person’s right to make their own medical decisions and help ensure that Mifepristone is available to those who need it,” Newsom said in a statement.

AB54 builds on AB260 by protecting healthcare providers from criminal prosecution by other states for prescribing or dispensing abortion drugs, including through the mail. AB54, called the Access to Safe Abortion Care Act, would reaffirm that it is lawful to mail, ship, take, receive, or otherwise transport any drug, medicine, or instrument that can be designed or adapted to produce an abortion that is lawful in California. 

California Democrats are also taking aim at Trump’s immigration policies and his plan to carry out mass deportations.

Trump and Newsom have gone head-to-head over the president’s decision to send in federalized soldiers and Marines to fight crime in California over the objections of state and local leaders. Earlier Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled Trump had broken federal law when he turned nearly 5,000 soldiers into a national police force. 

Many of the bills making their way through the legislature are seeking to counter Trump’s crackdown on immigration and would limit federal officers’ movements and anonymity in the state. 

Senate Bill 627, for example, would prohibit law enforcement agents from covering their faces to obscure their identity, carving out exceptions for SWAT teams and undercover officers. Another bill, SB805, would require officers to display their IDs with their name and badge numbers and limit the instances in which bounty hunters can get involved with immigration enforcement. 

“In a normal world, this legislation would be unnecessary and unheard of,” state Sen. Sasha Renée Péres (D-CA), the bill’s author, said in a statement. “With the rise in impersonation claims and the ensuing fear and confusion being created, there is a clear need for strong, more consistent standards for law enforcement identification. This legislation is not just raising the issue; it aims to directly address it by reaffirming the state’s role under its policing powers.” 

Other bills, such as AB1303, SB635, and SB81, would shield the public’s information from being shared with Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. Others, such as SB580 and SB294, would provide guidance to local agencies on protecting sensitive data and database management and, separately, would require employers to notify their workers of their rights related to immigration raids. 

JUDGE RULES TRUMP DEPLOYMENT OF NATIONAL GUARD TO LOS ANGELES VIOLATED FEDERAL LAW

There is also a heavy emphasis in the state legislature to protect schools from handing over information to federal immigration authorities unless they have a court order or warrant. Other bills require schools to inform parents that their children are entitled to free public education regardless of immigration status and that the schools must notify them when immigration officers are on site. 

While Republicans in the state legislature have sponsored a number of bills, most of their recent efforts were funneled into unsuccessfully stopping their Democratic counterparts from passing two bills that would redraw the congressional district maps and another that would give the governor the ability to call a Nov. 4 special election. 



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker