The Western Journal

Brennan Ignored Objections To Put Steele Dossier In Bogus ICA

The article discusses newly declassified documents revealing that former CIA Director John Brennan included the discredited Steele dossier in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), despite objections from intelligence experts about the dossier’s reliability. The Steele dossier, created by former British spy Christopher Steele for Hillary Clinton’s campaign, contained unverified and questionable claims that intelligence officials argued did not meet standard vetting procedures. According to the report declassified by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, CIA personnel expressed serious concerns regarding the dossier’s inclusion and credibility, with some senior officials arguing it should have been excluded. Brennan, however, allegedly dismissed these concerns, stating, “Yes, but doesn’t it ring true?” The dossier’s flawed integration into the ICA contributed to the launch of the Russia collusion examination, widely characterized as a hoax. The report highlights meaningful intelligence community disapproval of how the dossier was handled and calls into question the integrity of the ICA’s conclusions regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election. The article suggests that recent DOJ investigations into Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey may be necessary steps toward restoring trust in the intelligence community.


Share

Newly released documents show former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) John Brennan included the now-debunked Steele dossier in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) despite warnings from intelligence experts that the dossier was flawed. The dossier was later used as the basis to launch the Russia collusion hoax.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified a 2020 report by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence showing — among other things — that members of the intelligence community were concerned with several aspects of the ICA.

According to the newly declassified report, “CIA analysts and operations officers struggled to explain how the ICA … could have included dossier information without identifying and vetting primary sources and without explaining the political circumstances surrounding why the report was produced and funded.”

The dossier in question is the Steele dossier. Hillary Clinton’s campaign hired opposition research firm Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on Trump. Former British spy Christopher Steele, working on behalf of Fusion GPS, compiled opposition research that was pushed by the left as credible despite widespread concerns within the intelligence community about its credibility, according to the newly declassified report. The dossier was then shopped to the FBI and other intelligence agencies and used to push the Russia collusion hoax.

“The ICA sourcing errors involving the dossier violated so many ICD 203 directives, that the text would normally not have passed first-line supervisor review at CIA, FBI or other IC agencies,” the declassified report states. “Moreover, the dossier made outlandish claims and was written in an amateurish conspiracy and political propaganda tone that invited skepticism, if not ridicule, over its content.”

Two senior CIA officers contended that the dossier should have been omitted from the ICA “because it failed to meet basic tradecraft standards,” a senior officer at the meeting said, according to the report.

But according to the same senior officer, Brennan, when “confronted with the dossier’s many flaws,” said, “Yes, but doesn’t it ring true?”

[READNEXT:[READNEXT:Obama White House, Deep Staters Prove To Be The Real Threats To Democracy]

The report further states that “every CIA analyst and operations officer” asked about the dossier made sure to “emphasize that they had nothing to do with the decision to include Annex A” and could not “vouch” for it. A senior analyst at the FBI said the CIA did not want to include the dossier because the agency was “not comfortable with the sourcing.”

According to the report, the ICA “misrepresented both the significance and credibility of the dossier reports.”

While the ICA found that Russian President Vladimir Putin did order “cyber influence operations” and tried to “undermine faith in the US democratic process,” the determination that Putin preferred then-candidate Donald Trump “did not adhere to the tenets of the ICD [Intelligence Community Directive] standards,” according to the report.

The ICA, as The Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway noted, included a “‘key judgment’ … that Russia had interfered in the election specifically because Putin and the Russian government ‘aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances.’”

In light of the newly declassified details, the Department of Justice’s decision to conduct a criminal investigation into Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey may just be the bare minimum in restoring credibility to the intelligence community.




" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker