Pennsylvania plant receives billions in pollution-linked subsidies
The Controversial Side of Industrial Subsidies
Officials tout economic progress when blessing factories with tax breaks, but what happens when environmental commitments are swept under the rug? Does the promise of prosperity hold up against the cost of pollution?
“Too many of these companies frequently violate their air pollution control permits, often releasing hazardous chemicals that risk the health and safety of nearby communities.”
Billions in Subsidies, Billions in Breaches
The Environmental Integrity Project presents a concerning revelation: A whopping 64% of 50 newly built or expanded American plastics plants have enjoyed government subsidies, while an alarming 84% have overstepped air pollution boundaries.
- $9 billion in overall subsidies have been collected by these plants.
- Texas and Louisiana headline as central growth hubs for the plastic industry.
- The largest single subsidy was a mammoth $3.5 billion for a Lake Charles petrochemical plant.
Pennsylvania’s Subsidy Scandal
Pennsylvania has not escaped this troubling trend, handing out $1.7 billion to Shell for an ethylene and plastics facility. These hefty financial incentives were supposedly to fuel job creation and stimulate industry, yet pollution checks were not part of the deal.
Despite the state’s significant investment, Shell’s plant in Beaver County has struggled to meet the optimistic forecasts for economic upliftment.
“Pennsylvania does not tie the subsidies to environmental permit compliance.”
Tax Dollars Feeding Foreign Interests?
It’s noteworthy that many subsidy-receiving companies are internationally owned, meaning local taxpayers might be unwittingly funding foreign portfolios rather than their communities.
A Call for Environmental Accountability
Environmental guardians are sounding the alarm, aggrieved by Shell’s air quality infractions in the midst of taxpayer support. In a recent twist, Shell was pressed into a $10 million settlement with environmental authorities for its breaches. Yet, the most severe transgressors of air purity operate in Texas and Louisiana.
“We must stop subsidizing Shell’s environmental rule breaking.”
Looking Beyond Plastics
The spotlight isn’t solely on plastics. Pennsylvania’s emerging hydrogen sector, coupled with carbon capture innovation, is similarly poised to soak up generous subsidies.
The Path to Cleaner Industry
The Environmental Integrity Project has laid out a roadmap to a greener industrial landscape:
- Firmer permit regulations and comprehensive pollution tracking.
- Enhanced transparency with open public access to environmental data.
- A pivot away from subsidizing polluters to safeguard taxpayer interests.
Subsidies should be a tool for communal enrichment, not a blank check for environmental negligence. It’s time to reevaluate where public funds are best spent — to empower projects prioritizing ecological responsibility and public wellness.
“Public subsidies should be contingent upon environmental compliance.”
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
