Washington Examiner

Billionaire-supported philanthropy network cuts ties with Palestinian terror-linked group, halts grants.

Major Philanthropy ‌Network Cuts Ties with “Progressive” Charity Linked to Palestinian Terror

A philanthropy network​ funded by Texas billionaires is making a ‍bold move by refusing to support​ a “progressive” charity that has⁤ been​ dropped by four payment processors due to its ‌ties to Palestinian terrorism. Arnold Ventures, known for ⁢its annual giving of $231 million to various policy areas, has announced that it will no ‌longer provide grants to⁤ the Alliance for Global Justice, a charity connected to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine terrorist group.

This⁣ decision marks the⁢ first time a grantmaker has publicly distanced itself from the Arizona-based Alliance for‍ Global Justice, which has faced scrutiny and legal‌ pressure for its associations with terrorism. Arnold ‍Ventures had previously claimed that‍ a ⁣$5,000 donation made to ‌the charity in 2020 was intended to support racial justice ‌initiatives. ‌However, it has⁣ now ​clarified that⁤ it will no longer support the organization.

Controversial Connections

Alliance for ⁣Global Justice is known for its sponsorship of⁤ the ‍Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity⁣ Network, a coalition that has shared staff members with the PFLP and has shown support for Hamas. ​Several payment processors, including ⁣Deluxe, PayPal, Stripe, and Salsa Labs, ⁣have already severed ties ‌with the Arizona group. Even ActBlue, ⁤a ‍Democratic software platform, removed the fundraising account for Alliance for Global Justice’s Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel.

Samidoun has been‌ accused‍ of facilitating funds between the ‍PFLP and Syria and Lebanon, ⁤and one of its activists allegedly⁢ trained ⁤with Hezbollah. These connections have led to accusations that the Arizona group has provided “material support” to terrorism.

Questionable Grant ⁣Approvals

Arnold Ventures was one of many groups that approved grants to‍ Alliance for Global Justice ⁣in 2020. However, critics argue that the LLC should ‌never have approved the $5,000 donation in the⁤ first ​place. Victoria Coates, former ‍deputy national security adviser for Middle East and North⁢ African‍ affairs under President⁢ Donald⁤ Trump, believes that the incident served as a wake-up call regarding the potential⁤ funding of terrorism through ⁣well-intentioned donations.

Left-Wing Donors‍ and Scrutiny

Alliance for Global Justice ‍has received support⁢ from major left-wing donors, including ‍the George Soros-backed Foundation to Promote Open Society and the⁢ Ford Foundation. The breakout of the Israel-Gaza war has also brought attention to the support for ⁤Hamas expressed by certain groups in the U.S., including‍ those with⁢ tax-exempt status.

Senate Republicans ‌have recently called on PayPal to shut‌ down the account for‍ Black Lives Matter Chicago, which shared a graphic depicting ⁣a Hamas terrorist. The​ charity BLM Grassroots, which referred to the Hamas attack as a “desperate act of self-defense,” continues to fundraise through ActBlue.

With tensions escalating ‍and casualties ⁣rising, the decision by Arnold Ventures to sever ties with​ Alliance‌ for⁣ Global Justice sends a strong message ⁤about the importance of scrutinizing charitable donations and ensuring they do not inadvertently support terrorism.

Click ⁤here to read more from the Washington Examiner.

‍What steps should the Alliance for Global Justice take to distance itself from any affiliations with terrorist groups in order to regain trust and secure essential⁢ funding?

Iance for Global ‍Justice after it was revealed that the group had connections to terrorism.

The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, the organization linked to the Alliance for Global Justice, is recognized as​ a terrorist‌ group by the United States, European Union, Canada, and Australia. It has been involved in ⁢numerous attacks against civilians, including hijackings, bombings, and assassinations. By supporting the Alliance ‍for Global Justice,‌ Arnold Ventures inadvertently supported an organization with ties to terrorism.

Arnold⁤ Ventures Takes ‍a Stand

With its‍ history of‍ significant contributions to various policy areas, Arnold Ventures decided to take a strong stance against supporting organizations with‍ controversial connections. ‍The decision to cut ties with the​ Alliance for Global Justice⁣ demonstrates Arnold Ventures’ commitment to‌ ethical funding practices and its dedication to not inadvertently supporting terrorism.

While Arnold Ventures had initially claimed​ that⁣ its donation to the⁤ Alliance for Global Justice was intended to support⁣ racial justice initiatives, the philanthropy network has now realized the seriousness of the situation and has clarified its position. This move signifies a significant shift in the way ⁤grantmakers evaluate⁣ and ⁤support organizations, particularly in relation ‌to their affiliations and potential controversial ⁤connections.

The Importance of Ethical Funding Practices

This decision by Arnold Ventures highlights the critical need for⁢ philanthropy networks to thoroughly‍ research and vet the organizations they support. It serves as a reminder that financial ​support should never ‌be given blindly and that organizations should​ be held accountable for their associations and actions.

While the Alliance for Global Justice may have had admirable goals in supporting racial justice and social causes, its connections to terrorist groups undermine​ the credibility​ of their work. By severing ties with the‍ organization, Arnold ⁤Ventures sends a strong message ‍that ⁢philanthropic support should be directed towards organizations ⁢that uphold ethical standards‍ and do not have affiliations with terrorism.

Implications for the Alliance for Global ​Justice

With the loss of support from Arnold Ventures and ‌other payment processors, the​ Alliance for Global Justice faces significant ​challenges in its future operations. These steps taken ⁣by philanthropy networks and financial institutions indicate that organizations affiliated with terrorism will no longer be tolerated or financially supported.

The Alliance for Global Justice must now evaluate​ and address its associations and take actions to distance itself from any connections to terrorist groups. Failure to do so may further jeopardize their standing in ‌the philanthropic community and limit their ability to secure essential funding for their initiatives.

Conclusion

Arnold Ventures’‌ decision to⁤ cut ties with the Alliance for Global Justice sends a‌ powerful message about the importance of ethical funding⁣ practices and accountability. Philanthropy networks must ensure that their support ⁣aligns with the values they promote, and​ that organizations they fund do not have controversial affiliations.

While the Alliance for Global Justice ​may have had noble intentions, its connections to terrorism have tarnished its reputation and credibility. It is crucial ⁢for all philanthropic organizations to exercise due diligence, thoroughly vet organizations, and make informed decisions about the groups they choose to support.

Arnold Ventures’ bold move sets a precedent for other ​philanthropy networks to reevaluate‌ their⁤ funding practices and prioritize transparency, integrity, and ⁣the avoidance of any association with terrorism.‍ It‌ is through such actions that ⁢philanthropists can⁢ make a true and positive impact on society while⁤ maintaining the trust and respect of their donors and ‌beneficiaries.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker