Bill Clinton’s candid take on Hillary’s unsuccessful presidential campaign revealed in new book
Former President Bill Clinton’s Candid Assessment of Hillary’s 2016 Campaign
In a new book by author Ryan Grim, former President Bill Clinton delivers a brutally honest evaluation of his wife’s unsuccessful 2016 presidential campaign. According to Clinton, her campaign “could not sell p***y on a troop train.”
Identity Politics and the Mistake
Grim’s book, titled “The Squad: AOC and the Hope of a Political Revolution,” reveals that Hillary Clinton’s mistake was heavily relying on identity politics. Clinton believed that this strategy was an attempt to undermine her main primary opponent, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), by labeling him as “sexist” and other derogatory terms.
Grim writes, “To the extent that the campaign tactic moved the needle at all, it likely pushed moderate voters paying only marginal attention to the campaign towards Sanders, who spoke like a normal person while Clinton began ascending into what her ally James Carville would later call, ‘faculty lounge speak.'”
James Carville’s Concern
James Carville, a seasoned Democratic strategist, echoed Clinton’s concerns. He repeatedly expressed his worry that the average American voter would be put off by language they didn’t understand.
Carville explained, “They come up with a word like ’Latinx’ that no one else uses. Or they use a phrase like ‘communities of color.’ I don’t know anyone who speaks like that. I don’t know anyone who lives in a ‘community of color.’ I know lots of white and black and brown people, and they all live in… neighborhoods. This is not how people talk. This is not how voters talk. And doing it anyway is a signal that you’re talking one language and the people you want to vote for you are speaking another language.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
However, Bill Clinton’s assessment was even more blunt, as revealed in Grim’s book. He expressed his disappointment to a close friend in the fall of 2016, stating that Hillary’s campaign “could not sell p***y on a troop train.”
How does Clinton’s assessment of Hillary Clinton’s campaign strategy reflect his own experience as a successful politician
Rather than focusing on the issues that resonated with voters. According to Bill Clinton, this approach alienated a significant portion of the electorate and failed to connect with the core concerns of the American people.
Identity politics, the practice of mobilizing support based on a person’s gender, race, or other characteristics, has become increasingly prominent in recent years. While it can be a powerful tool for galvanizing certain voter groups, Clinton argues that it cannot be the singular focus of a political campaign. Instead, he believes that a campaign should prioritize addressing the economic concerns, security fears, and social issues that directly affect people’s daily lives.
The former President’s candid assessment is both scathing and revealing. It highlights the fundamental flaw in Hillary Clinton’s campaign strategy and provides valuable lessons for future political contenders. Bill Clinton clearly understands the delicate balance between appealing to specific demographics while also crafting a broad message that resonates across diverse communities.
Furthermore, Clinton’s evaluation underscores the dangers of ignoring the concerns of the working class. While identity politics may be appealing to some, it often fails to address the issues that affect the livelihoods and well-being of ordinary Americans. By neglecting these crucial matters and focusing too heavily on identity, Hillary Clinton’s campaign missed a vital opportunity to connect with voters and build a broad coalition of support.
This candid assessment also reflects Bill Clinton’s own experience as a successful politician. During his own presidential campaigns, Clinton was widely seen as a master of connecting with voters from all walks of life. His ability to empathize, understand, and speak to the concerns of everyday Americans played a significant role in his electoral victories.
It is worth noting that Bill Clinton’s assessment is not merely an indictment of Hillary Clinton’s campaign but also a critique of the broader trend of identity politics within the Democratic Party. As the party grapples with its messaging and seeks to rebuild its base, this assessment serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of focusing on the core issues that impact people’s lives.
In conclusion, Bill Clinton’s blunt evaluation of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign is an insightful reflection on the pitfalls of relying too heavily on identity politics. While identity can be an essential element of any campaign, it must not overshadow the core concerns of voters. To successfully connect with the electorate, political contenders must prioritize addressing the economic, security, and social issues that impact the lives of ordinary Americans. Bill Clinton’s assessment offers valuable lessons for future political campaigns and serves as a reminder of the importance of forging a broad coalition of support based on a holistic understanding of voters’ concerns.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
