Washington Examiner

Critics argue that Biden’s recent reduction in funding for the Wuhan lab is insufficient and belated.

Frequent Critics of the Biden Administration Applaud Funding Cut to Wuhan Institute of Virology

Frequent critics of the⁢ Biden ‍administration‌ on COVID-19 applauded a surprise move ⁣this week, but‌ say it should have gone much further.

President⁤ Joe Biden has cut off U.S. government funding‍ for ‍China’s Wuhan ⁣Institute of Virology after a review found the facility non-compliant with federal ‌regulations.

Biden Takes⁤ New Action on Junk​ Fees, Food Prices, and Corporate Mergers

For many observers, especially those favoring the lab leak COVID origin theory, it was long overdue.

“This is a step forward toward acknowledging that COVID-19 likely originated from U.S.-funded⁤ gain-of-function research at WIV and toward⁢ taking steps⁢ toward ‍preventing a future lab-generated pandemic,” said⁢ Rutgers University professor Richard Ebright.

But⁣ Ebright, a chemical‌ biology professor, also complained ‍the move was insufficient to ⁣fully address the problem.

For one, EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S.-based organization that ‌conducted coronavirus ‌research at the lab, is still receiving ⁤federal dollars ⁢and has not been disbarred. ⁣Ebright also says ​former National⁣ Institutes of⁣ Health director ‌Francis Collins and former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases leader ​Anthony‍ Fauci were not held accountable for their role.

He’d like to⁣ see a full ban on gain-of-function research.

Others noted the timing of the announcement,​ well​ over ⁢three ⁣years⁤ after⁣ the pandemic started and with ⁣most‍ people no longer thinking about it on a day-to-day basis.

“The funding that was previously denied to have existed has now⁢ been stopped,” vaccine skeptic Robert Malone tweeted, along with⁣ a link to a Washington Examiner story. ‌”Nothing ⁤to see here, move on.”

The WIV’s permanent funding block​ comes as‌ the⁢ lab continues drawing controversy over gain-of-function ⁢research that may ⁢have unleashed COVID-19 on the world.⁢ No ‍governing ⁢body has made the definitive determination that the virus leaked‍ from ‌the lab, but the‌ theory has gained steam ⁣after​ being buried‌ early on.

Seven million people have died from COVID-19 worldwide.

Biden ⁣previously authorized the release of a ⁢COVID origins⁤ report in June, which said the federal government ⁢will “continue‍ to assess that both a natural and laboratory-associated origin remain plausible hypotheses to ⁣explain the first ⁣human infection.”

The report did note that multiple scientists at the lab fell ill in the fall of 2019 and that “the institute frequently did not adhere to safety protocols.” The lab has ‌received more⁢ than $1.4⁤ million‍ in U.S. federal awards⁤ since 2014, though none since 2020.

A review of the⁢ Wuhan lab from the Department ‍of Health and Human Services began ‍in September, according to ⁣Bloomberg.

House ​Republicans are also ‌calling for⁣ EcoHealth to be disbarred, but arguably the biggest pandemic critic in⁢ Congress is Sen. Rand Paul ⁤(R-KY). Paul has sparred ‍with Fauci for years and is now holding up State Department nominations as he seeks more documents‌ about the virus’ ‍origin.

The ⁣Kentucky ‌senator‍ supports the funding ⁣ban, though he noted in a Fox News interview⁤ that Fauci at first denied that any U.S. money ever went to Wuhan.

“It’s not going ⁤far enough,” Paul ⁢said. ‌”It is a good step forward to forbid this, but we need to go beyond that to try to prevent this kind of accident from happening anywhere in‌ the ⁣world.”

Not everyone is convinced there’s a deeper meaning behind the funding ban.

Public⁣ health professor‌ Andrew Noymer noted that NIH began ⁣selectively‌ defunding WIV⁤ projects as early ⁣as May 2020.

“Some people⁤ will read tea leaves⁢ that this⁣ supports a lab leak origin of COVID-19, but I don’t ⁣think we can draw that⁤ conclusion,”⁤ Noymer, a professor at⁣ the University‌ of California, ‍Irvine, said. “This certainly is not a frank admission of a lab‍ leak origin of COVID, ‌and​ I ​don’t even read it as a tacit admission.”

Still, he too calls for further moves to prevent future pandemics.

“We should renew the moratorium on dangerous⁤ gain-of-function virology research,” Noymer said.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE⁢ FROM⁢ THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker